Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Dopplersonographie in Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie pp 67–80Cite as

Sicherheitsaspekte

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1955 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel werden die Sicherheitsaspekte bei der Anwendung der Dopplersonographie beleuchtet. Dazu werden die Messparameter für die Ultraschallexposition erläutert, zu denen der Schalldruck, Schallwellengeschwindigkeit, Wellenlänge, Abschwächung der Schallausbreitung, Schallfenster, „Pulsed-Mode“ sowie Ausgangsleistung und Intensität gehören. Bei der Messung von Bioeffekten werden Intensitätsgrößen, thermische und mechanische Messgrößen berücksichtigt. Daran schließt sich die Darstellung des akustischen Outputs moderner Ultraschallverfahren an. Danach folgt die Darstellung der Bioeffekte und möglichen Auswirkungen auf den Feten. Abschließend werden Beeinträchtigung der fetalen Entwicklung nach Ultraschallexposition diskutiert und Sicherheitsempfehlungen gegeben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Literatur

  • Abramowicz JS, Kossoff G, Marsal K, Ter Haar G. (2003) Safety Statement, 2000 (reconfirmed 2003) International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21: 100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abramowicz JS, Barnett SB, Duck FA, Edmonds PD, Hynynen KH, Ziskin MC (2008) Fetal thermal effects of diagnostic ultrasound. 27:541–59

    Google Scholar 

  • AIUM Statement. (2007) Prudent use in obstetrics. Available at: http://www.aium-org/publications/viewStatement.aspx?id=33. Accessed May 17, 2010

  • FDA. Fetal Keepsake videos (2009) Available at http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/PatientAlerts/ncm064756.htm. Accessed May 17, 2010

  • Barnett SB, Kossoff G (1998) Can diagnostic ultrasound heat tissue and cause biological effects? In: Barnett SB, Kossoff G (eds) Safety of diagnostic ultrasound. The Parthenon Publishing Group, New York London, pp 27‒38

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett SB, Ter Haar GR, Ziskin MC, Rott HD, Duck FA, Maeda K (2000) International recommendations and guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine. Ultrasound Med Biol. 26(3):355–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett SB, Maulik D;International Perinatal Doppler Society (2001) Guidelines and recommendations for safe use of Doppler ultrasound in perinatal applications. J Matern Fetal Med. 10(2):75–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett SB (2001) Intracranial temperature elevation from diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 27:883–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bly S, Van den Hof MC (2005) Diagnostic Imaging Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada: Obstetric ultrasound biological effects and safety. Obstet Gynaecol Can. 27(6):572–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church CC, Miller MW (2007) Quantification of risk from fetal exposure to diagnostik ultrasound. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 93:331–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duck FA, Martin K (1992) Exposure values for medical devices. In: Ziskin M, Lewin P (eds) Ultrasonic exposimetry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 315‒344

    Google Scholar 

  • Duck FA, Henderson J (1998) Acoustic output of modern ultrasound equipment: is it increasing? In: Barnett SB, Kossoff G (eds) Safety of diagnostic ultrasound. The Parthenon Publishing Group, New York London, pp 15‒25

    Google Scholar 

  • Duck FA (2008) Hazards, risks and safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Med Eng Phys. 30:1338–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFSUMB (1998) Newsletter. EFSUMB 11:8‒14

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (1992) Guide for measuring and reporting acoustic output of diagnostic ultrasound. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Techn Bull 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkovitz R, Sheiner E, Mazor M. (2002) Ultrasound in obstetrics: a review of safety. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 101(1):15–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huch R, Schneider KTM, Rott HD (1993) Sicherheitsaspekte der Ultraschall- und Ultraschalldoppler-Sonographie in der Schwangerschaft. Frauenarzt 34:261‒263

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrit CRB, Kremkau FW, Hobbins JC (1992) Diagnostic ultrasound: bioeffects and safety. Ultraound Obstet Gynecol 2:366‒37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DL (2008) Safety Assurance in Obstetrical Ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 29: 156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore RM, Diamond EL, Cavalieri RL (1988) The relationship of birth weight and intrauterine diagnostic ultrasound exposure. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 71(4):513–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newnham JP (1998) Studies of ultrasound safety in humans: clinical benefit vs. risk. In: Barnett SB, Kossoff G (eds) Safety of diagnostic ultrasound. The Parthenon Publishing Group, New York London, pp 99‒112

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemescu D, Berescu A, Rotariu C (2015) Variation of safety indices during in the learning curve for color Doppler assessment of the fetal heart at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks’ gestation. Med Ultrason. 17(4):464–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nemescu D, Berescu A, Onofriescu M, Navolan DB, Rotariu C. (2015) Safety Indices during Fetal Echocardiography at the Time of First-Trimester Scan Are Machine Dependent. PLoS One 27;10(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyborg WL. (2001) Biological effects of ultrasound: development of safety guidelines. Part II: general review. Ultrasound Med Biol 27(3): 301–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piscaglia F, Tewelde AG, Righini R, Gianstefani A, Calliada F, Bolondi L. (2009) Knowledge of the bio-effects of ultrasound among physicians performing clinical ultrasonography: Results of a survey conducted by the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). J Ultrasound. 12(1):6–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rott HD (1997) Zur Epidemiologie diagnostischer pränataler Ultraschallexposition. Hautnah Gynäkol Geburtshilfe 5:212‒214

    Google Scholar 

  • Rott HD (1998) EFSUMB: Watchdog Berichte 1997. Ultraschall Med 19:47‒50

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Haar G. (2010) Ultrasound bioeffects and safety. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 224:363–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salvesen KA, Lees C (2009) Ultrasound is not unsound, but safety is an issue. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:512–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KTM, Lippert A (1991) Der derzeitige Stand der Dopplersonographie. Umfrage an 253 Kliniken in West- und Ostdeutschland, der Schweiz und Österreich. Frauenarzt 33:873‒874

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratmeyer ME, Greenleaf JF, Dalecki D, Salvesen KA (2008) Fetal ultrasound: mechanical effects. J Ultrasound Med. 27:597–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone P, Ross I, Pringle K, Flower J (1992) Tissue heating effect of pulsed Doppler ultrasound in the live fetal lamb brain. Fetal Diagn Ther 7:26‒30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tarantal AF (1998) Effects of ultrasound exposure on fetal development in animal models. In: Barnett SB, Kossoff G (eds) Safety of diagnostic ultrasound. The Parthenon Publishing Group, New York London, pp 39‒51

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenström U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, Ekklund G, Fall O, Linderberg S, Sjodin Y (1988) Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2:585‒588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams A (1991) A critical evaluation of bioeffect reports and epidemiological surveys. In: Docker M, Duck F (eds) The safe use of diagnostic ultrasound. British Institute of Radiology, London, pp 30‒32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. emerit. Leiter der Abteilung fur Perinatalmedizin der TU Munchen, Hermann-Gmeiner-Weg 16, D-81929, München, Deutschland

    K. T. M. Schneider

Authors
  1. K. T. M. Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Praxis für Frauenheilkunde und Pränataldiagnostik, Salzburg, Austria

    Horst Steiner

  2. emerit. Leiter der Abteilung für Perinatalmedizin der TU München, München, Germany

    Karl-Theo M. Schneider

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schneider, K.T.M. (2018). Sicherheitsaspekte. In: Steiner, H., Schneider, KT. (eds) Dopplersonographie in Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54966-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54966-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54965-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54966-7

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation