Untersuchungsgang, Normalbefunde und Fehlerquellen in der gynäkologischen Dopplersonographie

  • G. Bogner


Dieses Kapitel beleuchtet den Untersuchungsgang, Normalbefunde und Fehlerquellen in der gynäkologischen Dopplersonographie. Dazu werden zuerst die Grundlagen des Generierens reproduzierbarer dopplersonographischer Signale sowie mögliche Fehlerquellen in der Beurteilung der Untersuchung aufgezeigt. Danach wird die Untersuchung der Uterusdurchblutung (Arterie uterina) mit der Modalität des Color-Flow-Mapping erläutert. Daran schließt sich die Diagnostik der ovariellen Durchblutung (Arteria ovarica und Corpus luteum). Mit dem Color-Flow-Mapping des Ovars können zyklische Veränderungen des Blutflusses dargestellt werden. Abschließend werden dopplersonographische Befunde in der Frühschwangerschaft, insbesondere bei Schwangerschaftspathologien, und in der Postmenopause erläutert.


  1. Alcazar JL, Rodriguez D (2009) Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular sonographic sampling for prediction ovarian cancer in cystic-solid and solid vascularized masses. J Ultrasound Med 28(3): 275–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcazar JL, Galvan R (2009) Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound scanning for the prediction of endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal bleeding and thickened endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(1);44.e1–6. Epub 2008 Oct 30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcazar JL, Ortiz CA. (2002) Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography in the management of first-trimester spontaneous abortion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.10;102(1): 83–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atri M (2003) Ectopic pregnancy versus corpus luteum cyst revisited: best Doppler predictors. J Ultrasound Med. 22(11): 1181–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan CC, Ng EH, Tang OS, Ho PC (2005) Circadian changes in uterine artery and ovarian stromal blood flow after pituitary down-regulation. J Soc Gynecol Investig. Sep;12(6): 452–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chien LW, Lee WS, Au HK, Tzeng CR (2004) assessment of changes in utero-ovarian arterial impedance during the peri-implantation period by Doppler sonography in women undergoing assisted reproduction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 23(5):496–500 Am J Obstet Gynecol. 193(1): 294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chittacharoen A, Theppisai U, Manonai J (2002) Transvaginal color Doppler sonographic evaluation of the uterus in postmenopausal women on daily raloxifene therapy. Climacteric. 5(2):156–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clapauch R, Mattos TM, Uchoa HB, Ferreira AS, Bonisson VG, Lopes EL, Nascimento IC, Bouskela E (2007) Use of vascular Doppler ultrasound to detect acute estradiol vascular effect in postmenopausal women. Clinics (Sao Paulo). Dec;62(6): 673–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fleischer AC (2005) Recent advances in the sonographic assessment of vascularity and blood flow in gynecologic conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 193(1): 294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frates MC, Doubilet PM, Durfee SM, Di Salvo DN, Laing FC, Brown DL, Benson CB, Hill JA (2001) Sonographic and Doppler characteristics of the corpus luteum: can they predict pregnancy outcome? J Ultrasound Med.;20(8): 821–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fung MF, Reid A, Faught W, Le T, Chenier C, Verma S, Brydon E, Fung KF (2003) Prospective longitudinal study of ultrasound screening for endometrial abnormalities in women with breast cancer receiving Tamoxifen. Gynecol Oncol. 91(1): 154–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jauniaux E, Gulbis B, Burton GJ (2005) The role of ultrasound imaging in diagnosing and investigating early pregnancy failure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 25(6): 342–52, ReviewCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hope JM, Long K, Kudla M, Arslan A, Tsymbal T, Strok I, Timor-Tritsch IE. Three-dimensional power Doppler angiography of cyclic ovarian blood flow. (2009) J Ultrasound Med. 28(8): 1043–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katz DL, Evans MA, Njike VY, Hoxley ML, Nawaz H, Comerford BP, Sarrel PM. Raloxifene, soy phytoestrogens and endothelial function in postmenopausal women. (2007) Climacteric. 10(6): 500–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kupesic SD, Kurjak A (1993) Uterine and ovarian perfusion during the periovulatory period assessed by transvaginal color Doppler. Fertil Steril 60: 439‒443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kurjak A, Kupesic S (1995) Ovarian senescense and its significance on the uterine and ovarian perfusion. Fertil Steril 64: 532‒537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kurjak A, Kupesic-Urek S, Schulman H, Zalud I (1991) Transvaginal color flow Doppler in the assessment of ovarian and uterine blood flow in infertile women. Fertil Steril 56: 870‒873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luzi G, Coata G, Cucchia GC, Cosmi EV, Di Renzo GC (1993) Doppler studies of uterine arteries in spontaneous and artificially induced menopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 3: 354‒356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ng EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, Yeung WS, Ho PC (2007) Endometrial and subendometrial vascularity is higher in pregnant patients with livebirth following ART than in those who suffer a miscarriage. Hum Reprod. Apr;22(4): 1134–41. Epub 2006 Dec 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mercé LT, Barco MJ, Bau S, Troyano J (2008) Are endometrial parameters by three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler angiography related to in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer outcome? Fertil Steril. Jan;89(1):111–7. Epub 2007 Jun 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pan HA, Li CH, Cheng YC, Wu MH, Chang FM (2003) Quantification of ovarian stromal Doppler signals in postmenopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy. Menopause.10(4): 366–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Penotti M, Fabio E, Modena AB, Rinaldi M, Omodei U, Vigano P (2003) Effect of soy-derived isoflavones on hot flushes, endometrial thickness, and the pulsatility index of the uterine and cerebral arteries. Fertil Steril. 79(5): 1112–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwarzler P, Holden D, Nielsen S, Hahlin M, Sladkevicius P, Bourne TH. (1999) The conservative management of first trimester miscarriages and the use of colour Doppler sonography for patient selection. Hum Reprod. 14(5): 1341–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sladkevicius P, Valentin L, Maršál K (1993) Blood flow velocity in the uterine and ovarian arteries during the normal menstrual cycle. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 3: 199‒208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sladkevicius P, Valentin L, Maršál K (1994) Blood flow velocity in the uterine and ovarian arteries during menstruation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4: 421‒427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tamura H, Takasaki A, Taniguchi K, Matsuoka A, Shimamura K, Sugino N (2008) Changes in blood-flow impedance of the human corpus luteum throughout the luteal phase and during early pregnancy. Fertil Steril. Dec;90(6): 2334–9. Epub 2008 Feb 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wherry KL, Dubinsky TJ, Waitches GM, Richardson ML, Reed S (2001) Low-resistance endometrial arterial flow in the exclusion of ectopic pregnancy revisited. J Ultrasound Med. 20(4): 335–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zaidi J, Jurkovic D, Campbell S, Okokon E, Tan SL (1995) Circadian variation in uterine artery blood flow indices during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5: 406‒410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zaidi J, Collins W, Campbell S, Pittrof R, Tan SL (1996) Blood flow changes in the intraovarian arteries during the periovulatory period: relationship to the time of day. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7: 135‒140CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Bogner
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der Paracelsus Medizinische UniversitätSalzburgÖsterreich

Personalised recommendations