Skip to main content

Knowing Values and Public Inspection

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNTCS,volume 10119)

Abstract

We present a basic dynamic epistemic logic of “knowing the value”. Analogous to public announcement in standard DEL, we study “public inspection”, a new dynamic operator which updates the agents’ knowledge about the values of constants. We provide a sound and strongly complete axiomatization for the single and multi-agent case, making use of the well-known Armstrong axioms for dependencies in databases.

Keywords

  • Knowing what
  • Bisimulation
  • Public announcement logic

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-54069-5_7
  • Chapter length: 14 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-662-54069-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this paper, by constant we mean something which has a single value given the actual situation. The range of possible values of a constant may be infinite. This terminology is motivated by first-order modal logic as it will become more clear later.

References

  1. Wang, Y.: Beyond knowing that: a new generation of epistemic logics. In: van Ditmarsch, H., Sandu, G. (eds.) Jaakko Hintikka on Knowledge and Game Theoretical Semantics. Springer (2016, forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  2. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic, vol. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Plaza, J.: Logics of public communications. Synthese 158(2), 165–179 (2007)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Baltag, A., Moss, L.S., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements, common knowledge, and private suspicions. In: Bilboa, I. (ed.) TARK 1998, pp. 43–56 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Armstrong, W.W.: Dependency structures of data base relationships. In: IFIP Congress, Geneva, Switzerland, vol. 74, pp. 580–583 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sweeney, L.: Only you, your doctor, and many others may know. Technology Science (2015). http://techscience.org/a/2015092903/

  7. Wang, Y., Fan, J.: Knowing that, knowing what, and public communication: public announcement logic with KV operators. In: IJCAI 2013, pp. 1147–1154 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Y., Fan, J.: Conditionally knowing what. In: Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 10, pp. 569–587 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gu, T., Wang, Y.: “Knowing value” logic as a normal modal logic. In: Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 11, pp. 362–381 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baltag, A.: To know is to know the value of a variable. In: Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 11, pp. 135–155 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Väänänen, J.: Dependence Logic: A New Approach to Independence Friendly Logic. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ciardelli, I., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive dynamic epistemic logic. Synthese 192(6), 1643–1687 (2015)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ciardelli, I.: Questions in logic. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ding, Y.: Epistemic logic with functional dependency operator. Bachelor’s thesis (in Chinese), Peking University (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. More, S.M., Naumov, P.: An independence relation for sets of secrets. Stud. Logica 94(1), 73–85 (2010)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Naumov, P.: Independence in information spaces. Stud. Logica 100(5), 953–973 (2012)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Naumov, P., Nicholls, B.: Rationally functional dependence. J. Philos. Logic 43(2–3), 603–616 (2014)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Harjes, K., Naumov, P.: Functional dependence in strategic games. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 57(3), 341–353 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the following people for useful comments on this work: Alexandru Baltag, Peter van Emde Boas, Hans van Ditmarsch, Jie Fan, Kai Li and our anonymous reviewers.

This research cooperation was made possible by travel grant 040.11.490 from NWO for Yanjing Wang, which is herewith gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malvin Gattinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Eijck, J., Gattinger, M., Wang, Y. (2017). Knowing Values and Public Inspection. In: Ghosh, S., Prasad, S. (eds) Logic and Its Applications. ICLA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10119. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54069-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54069-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54068-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54069-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)