Advertisement

Motivation und Volition im Beruf und am Arbeitsplatz

  • H. M. Kehr
  • M. Strasser
  • A. Paulus
Chapter
Part of the Springer-Lehrbuch book series (SLB)

Zusammenfassung

Arbeitsmotivation ist entscheidend für den Erfolg von Individuen, Teams und Organisationen. Entsprechend groß ist das Interesse von Wissenschaftlern und Praktikern an dieser Schlüsselvariable, die Leistung, Commitment und Arbeitszufriedenheit zu erklären vermag. Das vorliegende Kapitel gibt eine Einführung in die klassischen Theorien der Mitarbeitermotivation und in die gegenwärtige anwendungsbezogene Forschung zum Thema. Den Abschluss bildet das 3 K-Modell der Motivation, ein Rahmenmodell, das eine umfassende Systematik der Bestimmungsgrößen der Mitarbeitermotivation liefert.

Literatur

  1. Ach, N. K. (1935). Analyse des Willens. In E. Abderhalden (Hrsg.), Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden. Wien: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 267–299. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amann, D. G. (2014). Transformational leadership meets follower motives: Compatibility of dimensions of transformational leadership and follower motives determines work-related outcomes (Dissertation Technische Universität München). Zugriff unter http://mediatum.ub.tum.de?id=1227177
  4. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6, 355–385. doi: 10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 170–180. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.170 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K. & Li, N. (2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38, 132–153. doi: 10.5465/amr.2010.0479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F., Muraven, M. & Tice, D. M. (2000). Ego depletion: A resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled processing. Social Cognition, 18, 130–150. doi: 10.1521/soco.2000.18.2.130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bimber, O. & Raskar, R. (2005). Spatial augmented reality: Merging real and virtual worlds. Norwood, MA: CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blessin, B. & Wick, A. (2013). Führen und führen lassen (7. Aufl.). Konstanz: UTB.Google Scholar
  10. Bockman, V. M. (1971). The Herzberg controversy. Personnel Psychology, 24, 155–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb02470.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunstein, J. C., Schultheiss, O. C. & Grässman, R. (1998). Personal goals and emotional well-being: The moderating role of motive dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 494–508. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.494 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Burton, K. D., Lydon, J. E., D’Alessandro, D. U. & Koestner, R. (2006). The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 750–762. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.750 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cardador, M. T., Northcraft, G. B. & Whicker, J. (2016). A theory of work gamification: Something old, something new, something borrowed, something cool? Human Resource Management Review. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111–135. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.111 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (2012). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M. & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 980–1008. doi: 10.1037/a0035661 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, H. (2006). Flow on the net–detecting Web users’ positive affects and their flow states. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 221–233. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Das Flow-Erlebnis und seine Bedeutung für die Psychologie des Menschen. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Hrsg.), Die außergewöhnliche Erfahrung im Alltag. Die Psychologie des Flow-Erlebens (S. 29–49). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  19. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety: The experience of play in work and games. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The „what” and „why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 14–23. doi: 10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R. & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (S. 9–15). ACM. doi: 10.1145/2181037.2181040
  24. Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 586–598. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.586 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dörner, D. & Schaub, H. (1994). Errors in planning and decision-making and the nature of human information processing. Applied Psychology, 43, 433–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1994.tb00839.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Earley, P. C., Connolly, T. & Ekegren, G. (1989). Goals, strategy development, and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 24–33. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eerde, W.van & Thierry, H. (1996). Vroom’s expectancy models and work-related criteria: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 575–586. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. EY (2015). EY Jobstudie 2015 – Motivation, Gehalt und Arbeitszufriedenheit. Zugriff unter http://www.ey.com/DE/de/Newsroom/News-releases/EY-20150910-Generation-60-plus-arbeitet-am-engagiertesten.
  29. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358. doi: 10.1037/h0061470 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Frese, M. & Zapf, D. (1990). Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Hrsg.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2. Aufl., S. 271–340). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.Google Scholar
  31. Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223. doi: 10.1023/A:1025007614869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gagné, M. & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. doi: 10.1002/job.322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M.-H., Aubé, C., Morin, E. & Malorni, A. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 628–646. doi: 10.1177/0013164409355698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., … Westbye, C. (2015). The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 178–196. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Georgopoulos, B. S., Mahoney, G. M. & Jones jr., N. W. (1957). A path-goal approach to productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 345–353. doi: 10.1037/h0048473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Hrsg.), Handbook of motivation and cognition. Foundations of social behavior (2. Aufl., S. 53–92). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  37. Gollwitzer, P. M. & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). Goal effects on action and cognition. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Hrsg.), Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles (2. Aufl., S. 361–399). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  38. Gröpel, P. & Kehr, H. M. (2014). Motivation and self-control: Implicit motives moderate the exertion of self-control in motive-related tasks. Journal of Personality, 82, 317–328. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12059 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Güntert, S. T. (2015). The impact of work design, autonomy support, and strategy on employee outcomes: A differentiated perspective on self-determination at work. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 74–87. doi: 10.1007/s11031-014-9412-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  41. Haggard, P. (2008). Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 934–946. doi: 10.1038/nrn2497 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C. & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495–525. doi: 10.1037/a0019486 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Hajas, V. (2013). Motivationale Effekte von Unternehmensvisionen (Dissertation Technische Universität München). Zugriff unter http://mediatum.ub.tum.de?id=1166608
  44. Hamari, J. (2015). Do badges increase user activity? A field experiment on the effects of gamification. Computers in Human Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J. & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? – A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In IEEE 8th International Symposium on Service-Oriented System Engineering (SOSE) (S. 3025–3034). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J. & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170–179. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Heckhausen, H. & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 101–120. doi: 10.1007/BF00992338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  49. Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Oxford: World.Google Scholar
  50. Herzberg, F. (1976). The managerial choice: To be efficient and to be human. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  51. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Hillgruber, A. (1912). Fortlaufende Arbeit und Willensbetätigung. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
  53. House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 7, 323–352. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90024-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. House, R. J. & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3, 81–97. Zugriff unter http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA009513.
  55. House, R. J. & Shamir, B. (1993). Toward the integration of transformational, charismatic, and visionary theories. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman Roya (Hrsg.), Leadership theory and research. Perspectives and directions (S. 81–107). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  56. Hsu, C.-L. & Lu, H.-P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management, 41, 853–868. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D. & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1332–1356. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Isaac, R. G., Zerbe, W. J. & Pitt, D. C. (2001). Leadership and motivation: The effective application of expectancy theory. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, 212–226. Zugriff unter http://www.jstor.org/stable/40604345.
  59. Jenkins, G. D., Mitra, A., Gupta, N., Shaw, J. D. & Jenkins, G. D., JR. (1998). Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 777–787. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Judge, T. A. & Church, A. H. (2000). Job satisfaction: Research and practice. In C. L. Cooper & E. A. Locke (Hrsg.), Industrial and organizational psychology. Linking theory with practice (S. 166–198). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  61. Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Hrsg.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2. Aufl., S. 75–170). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.Google Scholar
  62. Kanfer, R. & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29, 440–458. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2004.13670969 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kanfer, R., Chen, G. & Pritchard, R. D. (2012). Work motivation: Past, present and future. The organizational frontiers series. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Kanfer, R. & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Motivational traits and skills: A person-centered approach to work motivation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 1–56.Google Scholar
  65. Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  66. Kashdan, T. B., Julian, T., Merritt, K. & Uswatte, G. (2006). Social anxiety and posttraumatic stress in combat veterans: Relations to well-being and character strenghts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 561–583. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.03.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Kehr, H. M. (1999). Entwurf eines konfliktorientierten Prozessmodells von Motivation und Volition. Psychologische Beiträge, 41, 20–43.Google Scholar
  68. Kehr, H. M. (2004a). Implicit/explicit motive discrepancies and volitional depletion among managers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 315–327. doi: 10.1177/0146167203256967 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Kehr, H. M. (2004b). Integrating implicit motives, explicit motives, and perceived abilities: The compensatory model of work motivation and volition. Academy of Management Review, 29, 479–499. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2004.13670963 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kehr, H. M. (2004c). Motivation und Volition: Funktionsanalysen, Feldstudien mit Führungskräften und Entwicklung eines Selbstmanagement-Trainings (SMT). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  71. Kehr, H. M. (2005). Implicit fear motives and volitional depletion among managers. 9. European Congress of Psychology, Granada, Spain.Google Scholar
  72. Kehr, H. M. (2008). Authentisches Selbstmanagement: Übungen zur Steigerung von Motivation und Willensstärke. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  73. Kehr, H. M. (2011). Führung durch Motivation: Implizite Motive, explizite Ziele und die Steigerung der Willenskraft. Personalführung, 4, 66–71. Zugriff unter http://www.dgfp.de/wissen/magazin/vorherige-ausgaben.
  74. Kehr, H. M. (2014). Das 3 K-Modell der Motivation. In J. Felfe (Hrsg.), Psychologie für das Personalmanagement: Bd. 27. Trends der psychologischen Führungsforschung. Neue Konzepte, Methoden und Erkenntnisse (S. 103–116). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  75. Kehr, H. M., Amann, D. G. & Giessner, S. (2016). Transformational leadership meets follower motives: Compatibility of dimensions of transformational leadership and follower motives determines work-related outcomes. Potsdam Leadership Symposium, Potsdam, Germany.Google Scholar
  76. Kehr, H. M. & Rawolle, M. (2009). Kopf, Bauch und Hand – wie Motivation Veränderungsprozesse unterstützt. Wirtschaftspsychologie Aktuell, 2, 23–26. Zugriff unter http://www.wirtschaftspsychologie-aktuell.de/heft2_2009.html.
  77. Kehr, H. M. & Rosenstiel, L.von (2006). Self-Management Training (SMT): Theoretical and empirical foundations for the development of a metamotivational and metavolitional intervention program. In D. H. Frey, H. Mandl & L. von Rosenstiel (Hrsg.), Knowledge and action (S. 103–141). Cambridge, MA: Huber & Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  78. Kelley, H. H. & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–501. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Kleinbeck, U. (2010). Handlungsziele. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Hrsg.), Motivation und Handeln (4. Aufl., S. 285–307). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Kleinbeck, U. & Schmidt, K.-H. (1996). Die Wirkung von Zielsetzungen auf das Handeln. In H. Heckhausen & J. Kuhl (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Bd. 4. Motivation, Volition und Handlung (S. 875–907). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  81. Kooij, D. T., Lange, A. H. de, Jansen, P. G. W., Kanfer, R. & Dikkers, J. S. E. (2011). Age and work-related motives: Results of a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 197–225. doi: 10.1002/job.665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Krevelen, D. W. van & Poelman, R. (2010). A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. The International Journal of Virtual Reality, 9, 1–20. Zugriff unter http://www.ijvr.org/web/search/singleArticle/32.
  83. Kuhl, J. (1996). Wille und Freiheitserleben: Formen der Selbststeuerung. In H. Heckhausen & J. Kuhl (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Bd. 4. Motivation, Volition und Handlung (S. 665–765). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  84. Kuhl, J. (2000). The volitional basis of Personality Systems Interaction Theory: Applications in learning and treatment contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 665–703. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00045-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kuhl, J. & Fuhrmann, A. (1998). Decomposing self-regulation and self-control: The volitional components inventory. In J. Heckhausen & C. S. Dweck (Hrsg.), Motivation and self-regulation across the life span (S. 15–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511527869.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Labouvie-Vief, G. (2003). Dynamic integration: Affect, cognition, and the self in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 201–206. doi: 10.1046/j.0963-7214.2003.01262.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Lang, J. W. B., Zettler, I., Ewen, C. & Hülsheger, U. R. (2012). Implicit motives, explicit traits, and task and contextual performance at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1201–1217. doi: 10.1037/a0029556 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Latham, G. P. (2012). Work motivation: History, theory, research, and practice (2. Aufl.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Latham, G. P. & Locke, E. A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 212–247. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90021-K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Latham, G. P. & Locke, E. A. (2007). New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. European Psychologist, 12, 290–300. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.12.4.290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Latham, G. P., Stajkovic, A. D. & Locke, E. A. (2010). The relevance and viability of subconscious goals in the workplace. Journal of Management, 36, 234–255. doi: 10.1177/0149206309350777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157–189. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (1979). Goal setting – a motivational technique that works. Organizational Dynamics, 8, 68–80. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(79)90032-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  95. Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (2004). What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Academy of Management Review, 29, 388–403. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2004.13670974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (2013). New developments in goal setting and task performance. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. Locke, E. A. & Kristof, A. L. (1996). Volitional choices in the goal achievement process. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Hrsg.), The psychology of action. Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (S. 365–384). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  99. Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M. & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125–152. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Lu, Y., Zhou, T. & Wang, B. (2009). Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B. & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396. doi: 10.1037/h0054346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40, 812–825. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. McClelland, D. C. (1995). Scientific psychology as a social enterprise (unpubliziertes Manuskript).Google Scholar
  105. McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R. & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Miner, J. B. (2015). Organizational behavior 1: Essential theories of motivation and leadership. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  107. Muraven, M. & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary leadership: Creating a compelling sense of direction for your organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  110. Ng, T. W. H. & Feldman, D. C. (2010). The relationships of age with job attitudes: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 63, 677–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01184.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Nink, M. (2014). Engagement-Index: Die neuesten Daten und Erkenntnisse aus 13 Jahren Gallup-Studie. München: Redline.Google Scholar
  112. Northouse, P. G. (2015). Leadership: Theory and practice (7. Aufl.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  113. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2015). Ageing and employment policies. Zugriff unter: http://www.oecd.org/employment/ageingandemploymentpolicies.htm.
  114. Pinder, C. C. (2008). Work motivation in organizational behavior (2. Aufl.). Washington, DC: Psychology.Google Scholar
  115. Posthuma, R. A. & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35, 158–188. doi: 10.1177/0149206308318617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Rand, A. & Branden, N. (1964). The virtue of selfishness: A new concept of egoism. New York: Signet.Google Scholar
  117. Rawolle, M., Kehr, H. M. & Glaser, J. (2007). Why self-set goals may sometimes be nonmotivating. In C. Wankel (Hrsg.), 21. century management. A reference handbook (S. 203–210). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  118. Rawolle, M., Schultheiss, O. C., Strasser, A. & Kehr, H. M. (2016). The motivating power of visionary images: Effects on motivation, affect, and behavior. Journal of Personality. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12285 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Rhodes, S. R. (1983). Age-related differences in work attitudes and behavior: A review and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 328–367. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.93.2.328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Rosenstiel, L. von, Kehr, H. M. & Maier, G. W. (2000). Motivation and volition in pursuing personal work goals. In J. Heckhausen (Hrsg.), Motivational psychology of human development: Developing motivation and motivating development (S. 287–305). Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4115(00)80017-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Sachau, D. A. (2007). Resurrecting the motivation-hygiene theory: Herzberg and the positive psychology movement. Human Resource Development Review, 6, 377–393. doi: 10.1177/1534484307307546 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mandl, H. & Klevers, M. (2013). Psychological perspectives on motivation through gamification. Interaction Design & Architecture(s), 19, 28–37. Zugriff unter http://www.mifav.uniroma2.it/inevent/events/idea2010/doc/19_2.pdf.
  124. Schattke, K., Brandstätter, V., Taylor, G. & Kehr, H. M. (2014). Flow on the rocks: motive-incentive congruence enhances flow in rock climbing. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 45, 603–620. doi: 10.7352/IJSP.2014.45.603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Schattke, K., Seeliger, J., Schiepe-Tiska, A. & Kehr, H. M. (2012). Activity-related incentives as motivators in open innovation communities. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations (IJKBO), 2, 21–37. doi: 10.4018/ijkbo.2012010102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Schiepe-Tiska, A., Schattke, K. & Kehr, H. M. (2016). Flow in open innovation: A test of the predictive power of the compensatory model of motivation. Manuskript eingereicht zur Publikation.Google Scholar
  127. Schmalstieg, D. & Hollerer, T. (2016). Augmented reality: Principles and practice. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Schmidt, K.-H. & Kleinbeck, U. (1999). Funktionsgrundlagen der Leistungswirkungen von Zielen bei der Arbeit. In M. Jerusalem & R. Pekrun (Hrsg.), Emotion, Motivation und Leistung (S. 291–304). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  129. Schmidt, K. H. & Kleinbeck, U. (2006). Führen mit Zielvereinbarung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  130. Schüler, J., Brandstätter, V. & Sheldon, K. M. (2013). Do implicit motives and basic psychological needs interact to predict well-being and flow? Testing a universal hypothesis and a matching hypothesis. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 480–495. doi: 10.1007/s11031-012-9317-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Schweitzer, M. E., Ordóñez, L. & Douma, B. (2004). Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 422–432. doi: 10.2307/20159591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E. & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1333–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Sokolowski, K. (1997). Sequentielle und imperative Konzepte des Willens. Psychologische Beiträge, 39, 346–369. Zugriff unter http://www.bildung.uni-siegen.de/mitarbeiter/sokolowski/publikationen/soko_psychbeitr_1997.pdf.
  134. Srivastava, A., Locke, E. A. & Bartol, K. M. (2001). Money and subjective well-being: it’s not the money, it’s the motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 959–971. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.959 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T. & Shapiro, D. L. (2004). Introduction to special topic forum: The future of work motivation theory. The Academy of Management Review, 29, 379–387. doi: 10.2307/20159049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Strasser, M. & Kehr, H. M. (2012). Motivation gezielt fördern. Coaching-Magazin, 13, 38–41. Zugriff unter http://www.coaching-magazin.de/archiv/2012/rauen_coaching-magazin_2012-01.pdf.
  137. Strasser, A., Rawolle, M. & Kehr, H. M. (2011). Wie Visionen wirken – Wissenschaftler untersuchen Motivation durch mentale Bilder. Wirtschaftspsychologie Aktuell, 2, 9–13.Google Scholar
  138. Thrash, T. M., Elliot, A. J. & Schultheiss, O. C. (2007). Methodological and dispositional predictors of congruence between implicit and explicit need for achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 961–974. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Trapp, J. K. & Kehr, H. M. (2016). How the influence of the implicit power motive on negotiation performance can be neutralized by a conflicting explicit affiliation motive. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 159–162. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Tyler, T. R. & Lind, E. A. (2002). Procedural justice. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Hrsg.), Handbook of justice research in law (S. 65–92). New York, NY: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271–360. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  143. Webster, J., Trevino, L. K. & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 411–426. doi: 10.1016/0747-5632(93)90032-N CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Weibler, J. (2016). Personalführung (2. Aufl.). München: Vahlen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Werbach, K. & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton.Google Scholar
  147. Winter, D. G., John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C. & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230–250. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.230 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Wood, R. E. & Locke, E. A. (1990). Goal-setting and strategy effects on complex tasks. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 73–109.Google Scholar
  149. Wundt, W. M. (1896). Grundriß der Psychologie. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Psychologie, TUM School of ManagementTechnische Universität MünchenMünchenDeutschland
  2. 2.Lehrstuhl für Psychologie, TUM School of ManagementTechnische Universität MünchenMünchenDeutschland
  3. 3.Lehrstuhl für Psychologie, TUM School of ManagementTechnische Universität MünchenMünchenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations