Advertisement

Biologisches Paradigma

  • John F. Rauthmann
Chapter
Part of the Springer-Lehrbuch book series (SLB)

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel gibt einen Überblick über das biologische Paradigma, das versucht, Persönlichkeit anhand neurowissenschaftlicher, genetischer und evolutionstheoretischer Erkenntnisse zu erklären. Es ist eines der modernen Paradigmen und gewinnt immer mehr an Bedeutung und Forschungsvolumen. Dieses Paradigma ist stark durch konkrete biologische Methodik und empirische Erkenntnisse geprägt. Es lassen sich drei Strömungen ausmachen:

Literatur

  1. Allen, T. A., & DeYoung, C. G. (im Druck). Personality neuroscience and the five factor model. In T. A. Widiger (Hrsg.), Oxford handbook of the five factor model. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Amin, N., Schuur, M., et al. (2011). A genome-wide linkage study of individuals with high scores on NEO personality traits. Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 1031–1041.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ando, J., Ono Y., et al. (2004). The genetic structure of Cloninger’s seven-factor model of temperament and character in a Japanese sample. Journal of Personality, 70, 583–609.Google Scholar
  4. Arslan, R. C., & Penke, L. (2015). Evolutionary genetics. In D. M. Buss (Hrsg.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology vol. 2: Integrations (S. 1047–1066). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Asendorpf, J. B., & Neyer, F. J. (2012). Psychologie der Persönlichkeit (5. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Benjamin, J., Li, L., et al. (1996). Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of Novelty Seeking. Nature Genetics, 12, 81–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Berridge, K. C. (2007). The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: The case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 191, 391–431.Google Scholar
  8. Berridge, K. C. (2012). From prediction error to incentive salience: Mesolimbic computation of reward motivation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 1124–1143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Birbaumer, N., & Schmidt, R. F. (2010). Biologische Psychologie. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., & Caspi, A. (2014). The behavioral genetics of personality development in adulthood – Classic, contemporary, and future trends. European Journal of Personality, 28, 244–255.Google Scholar
  11. Bleidorn, W., Schönbrodt, F., Gebauer, J. E., Rentfrow, P. E., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2016). To live among like-minded others: Exploring the links between person-city personality fit and self-esteem. Psychological Science 27, 419–427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (1997). The genetics of personality. In K. Blum & E. P. Noble (Hrsg.), Handbook of psychiatric genetics (S. 273–296). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (2004). Genetic influence on human psychological traits. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 148–151.Google Scholar
  14. Bouchard, T. J. Jr., & Loehlin, J. C. (2001). Genes, evolution, and personality. Behavior Genetics, 31, 243–273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bouchard, T. J. Jr., & McGue, M. (2003). Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. Journal of Neurobiology, 54, 4–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Briley, D. A., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2014). Genetic and environmental continuity in personality development: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1303–1331.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Briley, D. A., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2016). Comparing the developmental genetics of cognition and personality over the life span. Journal of Personality.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12186.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Brocke, B., Hennig, J., & Netter, P. (2004a). Biopsychologische Theorien der Persönlichkeit. In K. Pawlik (Hrsg.), Theorien und Anwendungsfelder der Differentiellen Psychologie (S. 365–430). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  19. Brocke, B., Spinath, F. M., & Strobel, A. (2004b). Verhaltensgenetische Ansätze und Theorien der Persönlichkeitsforschung. In K. Pawlik (Hrsg.), Theorien und Anwendungsfelder der Differentiellen Psychologie (S. 431–486). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  20. Brody, N. (1988). Personality in search of individuality. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Buss, D. M. (1987). Selection, evocation and manipulation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 53, 1214–1221.Google Scholar
  22. Buss, D. M. (1991). Evolutionary personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 459–491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.Google Scholar
  24. Buss, D. M. (1996). Social adaptation and five major factors of personality. In J. S. Wiggins (Hrsg.), The five factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (S. 180–207). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Buss, D. M. (1999, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2015). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind ( 5 ., 4., 3., 2., 1. Aufl. ). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  26. Buss, D. M. (2009). How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 359–366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Buss, D. M. (im Druck). The handbook of evolutionary psychology (2. Aufl.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Buss, D. M., & Greiling, H. (1999). Adaptive individual differences. Journal of Personality, 67, 209–243.Google Scholar
  29. Buss, D. M., & Hawley, P. (Hrsg.). (2011). The evolution of personality and individual differences. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Buss, D. M., & Penke, L. (2015). Evolutionary personality psychology. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper, & R. J. Larsen (Hrsg.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (S. 3–29). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  31. Camperio Ciani, A. S., & Capiluppi, C. (2011). Gene flow by selective emigration as a possible cause for personality differences between small islands and mainland populations. European Journal of Personality, 25, 53–64.Google Scholar
  32. Camperio Ciani, A. S., Capiluppi, C., Veronese, A., & Sartori, G. (2007). The adaptive value of personality differences revealed by small island population dynamics. European Journal of Personality, 21, 3–22.Google Scholar
  33. Canli, T. (2008). Toward a „molecular psychology“ of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (S. 311–327). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  34. Caspi, A., McClay, J., et al. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297, 851–854.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Chabris, C. F., Lee, J. J., Cesarini, D., Benjamin, D. J., & Laibson, D. I. (2015). The Fourth Law of Behavior Genetics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 304–312.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Cloninger C. R. (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 573–588.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Cloninger, C. R. (1999a). The temperament and character inventory – Revised. St Louis, MO: Center for Psychobiology of Personality, Washington University.Google Scholar
  38. Cloninger, C. R. (Hrsg.). (1999b). Personality and psychopathology. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  39. Cloninger, C. R. (2004). Feeling good: The science of well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Cloninger, C. R. (2008). The psychobiological theory of temperament and character: Comment on Farmer and Goldberg (2008). Psychological Assessment, 20, 292–299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 975–989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. D. (1999). Das Temperament- und charakter-inventar. Frankfurt: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.Google Scholar
  43. Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., et al. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65, 110–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Corr, P. J. (2008). Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST): Introduction. In P. J. Corr (Hrsg.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (S. 1–39). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Corr, P. J., DeYoung, C. D., & McNaughton, N. (2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 158–175.Google Scholar
  46. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. 2006. Universal Minds: Explaining the new science of evolutionary psychology. (Darwinism Today Series). London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  47. Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Barkow. J. (1992). Introduction: Evolutionary psychology and conceptual integration. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Hrsg.), The adapted mind (S. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Crick, F. (1970). Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature, 227, 561–563.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  50. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  51. Davies, G., Tenesa, A., et al. (2011). Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenetic. Molecular Psychiatry, 16, 996–1005.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Deary, I. J., Penke, L., & Johnson, W. (2010). The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 201–211.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Individual reaction norms underlying the Five Factor Model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1285–1302.Google Scholar
  54. DeYoung, C. G. (2010). Personality neuroscience and the biology of traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1165–1180.Google Scholar
  55. DeYoung, C. G., & Clark, R. (2012). The gene in its natural habitat: The importance of gene-trait interactions. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 1307–1318.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. DeYoung, C. G., Hirsh, J. B., Shane, M. S., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., & Gray, J. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the Big Five. Psychological Science, 21, 820–828.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Draper, P., & Harpending, H. (1982). Father absence and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Anthropological Research, 38, 255–273.Google Scholar
  59. Ebstein, R. P. (2006). The molecular genetic architecture of human personality: Beyond self-report questionnaires. Molecular Psychiatry, 11, 427–445.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Ebstein, R. P., Novick, O., et al. (1996). Dopamine D4 Receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of Novelty Seeking. Nature Genetics, 12, 78–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Eichler, E. E., Flint, J., Gibson, G., Kong, A., Leal, S. M., Moore, J. H., & Nadeau, J. H. (2010). Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease. Nature Review Genetics, 11, 446–450.Google Scholar
  62. Ellis, B. J., & Garber, J. (2000). Psychosocial antecedents of variation in girls’ pubertal timing: Maternal depression, stepfather presence, and marital and family stress. Child Development, 71, 485–501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Ellis, B. J., McFadyen-Ketchum, S., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (1999). Quality of early family relationships and individual differences in the timing of pubertal maturation in girls: A longitudinal test of an evolutionary model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 387–401.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Ewen, R. (2011). An introduction to theories of personality (7. Aufl.). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  65. Eysenck, H.-J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Eysenck, H.-J. (1957). The dynamics of anxiety and hysteria. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Eysenck, H.-J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield: Thomas.Google Scholar
  68. Eysenck, H.-J. (1970). The structure of human personality. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
  69. Eysenck, H.-J. (1981). A model for personality. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  70. Eysenck, H.-J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  71. Fahrenberg, J., & Myrtek, M. (2005). Psychophysiologie in Labor, Klinik und Alltag. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  72. Falconer, D. D. (1960). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
  73. Farmer, R. F., & Goldberg, L. R. (2008). Brain modules, personality layers, planes of being, spiral structures, and the equally implausible distinction between TCI-R „temperament“ and „character“ scales: Reply to Cloninger. Psychological Assessment, 20, 300–304.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., et al. (2005). The K-factor: Individual differences in life history strategy. Personality and individual differences, 39, 1349–1360.Google Scholar
  75. Francis, D. D., Diorio, J., Liu, D., & Meaney, M. J. (1999). Nongenomic transmission across generations in maternal behavior and stress responses in the rat. Science, 286, 1155–1158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Fu, W., et al. (2012). Analysis of 6,515 exomes reveals the recent origin of most human protein-coding variants. Nature, 493, 216–220.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Gadgil, M., & Bossert, W. H. (1970). Life historical consequences of natural selection. American Naturalist, 104, 1–24.Google Scholar
  78. Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  79. Gangestad, S. W. (2011). Evolutionary processes explaining genetic variance in personality: An exploration of scenarios. In D. M. Buss & P. H. Hawley (Hrsg.), The evolution of personality and individual differences (S. 338–375). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Gazzaniga, M. S., & Heatherton, T. F. (2003). Psychological science: Mind, brain, and behavior. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  81. Genetics of Personality Consortium. (2015). Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for neuroticism, and the polygenic association with major depressive disorder. JAMA Psychiatry, 72, 642–650.Google Scholar
  82. Gillespie, N. A., Cloninger, C. R., Heath, A. C., & Martin, N. G. (2003). The genetic and environmental relationship between Cloninger’s dimensions of temperament and character. Personality & Individual Differences, 35, 1931–1946.Google Scholar
  83. Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behavior Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266.Google Scholar
  84. Gray, J. A. (1972a). The psychophysiological nature of introversion–extraversion: A modification of Eysenck’s theory. In V. D. Nebylitsyn & J. A. Gray (Hrsg.), The biological bases of individual behavior (S. 182–205). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  85. Gray, J. A. (1972b). Learning theory, the conceptual nervous system and personality. In V. D. Nebylitsyn & J. A. Gray (Hrsg.), The biological bases of individual behavior (S. 372–399). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  86. Gray, J. A. (1975). Elements of a two-process theory of learning. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  87. Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Hansenne, M., Delhez, M., & Cloninger, C. R. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised (TCI-R) in a Belgian sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 40–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Heard, E., & Martienssen, R. A. (2014). Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: Myths and mechanisms. Cell, 157, 95–109.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Hennig, J. (2004). Personality, serotonin, and noradrenaline. In R. M. Stelmack (Hrsg.), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honor of Marvin Zuckerman (S. 379–395). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  93. Hennig, J. (2005). Immunsystem und Persönlichkeit. In J. Hennig & P. Netter (Hrsg.), Biopsychologische Grundlagen der Persönlichkeit (S. 511–538). München: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  94. Hennig, J., & Netter, P. (Hrsg.). (2012). Biopsychologische Grundlagen der Persönlichkeit. München: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  95. Hindorff, L. A., Sethupathy, P., et al. (2009). Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 9362–9367.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Human Genome Project Information. History of the Human Genome Project. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Human Genome Program. http://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/project/index.shtml (Zugegriffen: 06.03.2017)
  97. Hyde, J. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Hyde, J. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., & Vernon, P. A. (1996). Heritability of the Big Five personality dimensions and their facets: A twin study. Journal of Personality, 64, 577–591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Johnson, A. M., Vernon, P. A., & Feiler, A. (2008). Behavioral genetic studies of personality: An introduction and review of the results of 50+ years of research. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality theory and assessment (S. 145–173). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  101. Johnson, W. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on behavior: Capturing all the interplay. Psychological Review, 114, 423–440.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. Johnson, W., Penke, L., & Spinath, F. M. (2011). Understanding heritability: What it is and what it is not. European Journal of Personality, 25, 287–294.Google Scholar
  103. Jokela, M. (2009). Personality predicts migration within and between U.S. states. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 79–83.Google Scholar
  104. Jokela, M. (2014). Flow of cognitive capital across rural and urban United States. Intelligence, 46, 47–53.Google Scholar
  105. Jokela, M., Bleidorn, W., Lamb, M. E., Gosling, S. D., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2015). Geographically varying associations between personality and life satisfaction in the London metropolitan area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 725–730.Google Scholar
  106. Jokela, M., Elovainio, M., Kivimäki, M., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2008). Temperament and migration patterns in Finland. Psychological Science, 19, 831–837.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Jonason, P. K., Webster, G. W., Schmitt, D. P., Li, N. P., & Crysel, L. (2012). The antihero in popular culture: A life history theory of the Dark Triad. Review of General Psychology, 16, 192–199.Google Scholar
  108. Jorgensen, R. S., Johnson, B. T., Kolodziej, M. E., & Schreer, G. E. (1996). Elevated blood pressure and personality: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 293–320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Kaplan, H. S., & Gangestad, S. W. (2005). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Hrsg.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (S. 68–95). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  110. Keightley, P. D. (2012). Rates and fitness consequences of new mutations in humans. Genetics, 190, 295–304.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  111. Keller, M. C., & Miller, G. F. (2006). Resolving the paradox of common, harmful, heritable mental disorders: Which evolutionary genetic models work best? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 385–452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Kellermann, N. P. (2013). Epigenetic transmission of Holocaust trauma: Can nightmares be inherited? The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 50, 33–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Krueger, R. F., & Tackett, J. L. (2007). Behavior genetic designs. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Hrsg.), Handbook of research methods in personality (S. 62–78). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  114. Latter, B. D. H. (1980). Genetic differences within and between populations of the major human subgroups. The American Naturalist, 116, 220–237.Google Scholar
  115. Lesch, K. P., Bengel, D., et al. (1996). Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science, 274, 1527–1531.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Genes and environment in personality development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  117. Loehlin, J. C. (2005). Resemblance in personality and attitudes between parents and their children: Genetic and environmental contributions. In S. Bowles, H. Gintis, & M. O. Groves (Hrsg.), Unequal chances: Family background and economic success (S. 192–207). New York & Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation & Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  118. Loehlin, J. C. (2010). Environment and the behavior genetics of personality: Let me count the ways. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 302–305.Google Scholar
  119. Loehlin, J. C., McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., & John, O. P. (1998). Heritabilities of common and measure-specific components of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 431–453.Google Scholar
  120. Mackay, T. F. C. (2001). The genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Annual Review of Genetics, 35, 303–339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Matthews, G., & Gilliland, K. (1999). The personality theories of H. J. Eysenck and J. A. Gray: A comparative review. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 583–626.Google Scholar
  122. Maher, B. (2008). Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability. Nature, 456, 18–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Manolio, T. A., Collins, F. S., et al. (2010). Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature, 461, 747–753.Google Scholar
  124. McAndrew, F. T. (2002). New evolutionary perspectives on altruism: Multilevel selection and costly signaling theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 79–82.Google Scholar
  125. McGowan, P. O., Sasaki, A., et al. (2009). Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 342–348.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear⁄anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 285–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2008). The neuropsychology of fear and anxiety: A foundation for reinforcement sensitivity theory. In P. J. Corr (Hrsg.), The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality (S. 44–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  128. Mendel, J. G. (1866). Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden. Brünn: Georg Gastls Buchdruckerei.Google Scholar
  129. Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  130. Munafo, M. R., & Flint, J. (2011). Dissecting the genetic architecture of human personality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 395–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Munafo, M. R., Yalcin, B., Willis-Owen, S. A., & Flint, J. (2008). Association of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene and approach-related personality traits: Meta-analysis and new data. Biological Psychiatry, 63, 197–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Myers, D. G. (2014). Psychologie. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  133. Neberich, W., Penke, L., Lehnart, J., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2010). Family of origin, age at menarche, and reproductive strategies: A test of four evolutionary-developmental models. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 153–177.Google Scholar
  134. Netter, P. (2004). Personality and hormones. In R. M. Stelmack (Hrsg.), On the psychobiology of personality (S. 353–377). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  135. Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622–631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Northstone, K., Golding, J., Davey Smith, G., Miller, L. L., & Pembrey, M. (2014). Prepubertal start of father’s smoking and increased body fat in his sons: Further characterisation of paternal transgenerational responses. European Journal of Human Genetics, 22, 1382–1386.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  137. Paris, J. (2005). Neurobiological dimensional models of personality: A review of the models of Cloninger, Depue, and Siever. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 156–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Penke, L. (2011). Bridging the gap between modern evolutionary psychology and the study of individual differences. In D. M. Buss, & P. H. Hawley (Hrsg.), The evolution of personality and individual differences (S. 243–279). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  139. Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  140. Penke, L., Denissen, J. J. A., & Miller, G. F. (2007). The evolutionary genetics of personality. European Journal of Personality, 21, 549–587.Google Scholar
  141. Penke, L., & Jokela, M. (2016). The evolutionary genetics of personality revisited. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 104–109.Google Scholar
  142. Plomin, R. (1990). The role of inheritance in behavior. Science, 248, 183–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Plomin, R. (2002). Individual differences research in a postgenomic world. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 909–920.Google Scholar
  144. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2016). Top 10 replicated findings from behavioral genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 3–23.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  145. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., & Loehlin, J. C. (1977). Genotype-environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 309–322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & Rutter, M. (2008). Behavioral genetics. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  147. Plomin, R., McClearn, G. E., et al. (1994). DNA markers associated with high versus low IQ: The IQ Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Project. Behavior Genetics, 24, 107–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Polderman, T. J. C., Benyamin, B., et al. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47, 702–709.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Power, R. A., & Pluess, M. (2015). Heritability estimates of the Big Five personality traits based on common genetic variants. Translational Psychiatry, 5, e604.  https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2015.96.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  150. Rentfrow, P. J. (2013). Geographical differences in personality. In P. J. Rentfrow (Hrsg.), Geographical psychology: Exploring the interaction of environment and behavior (S. 115–137). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  151. Rentfrow, P. J., Jokela M., & Lamb, M. E. (2015). Regional personality differences in Great Britain. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0122245.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Strelau, J. (1997). Genetic and environmental influences on personality: A study of twins reared together using the self- and peer report NEO-FFI scales. Journal of Personality, 65, 449–475.Google Scholar
  153. Robinson, G. E. (2004). Beyond nature and nurture. Science, 304, 397–399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. Rushton, J. P., Bons, T. A., & Hur, Y.-M. (2008). The genetics and evolution of a general factor of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1173–1185.Google Scholar
  155. Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype-environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Schmitt, M., & Altstötter-Gleich, C. (2010). Differentielle und Persönlichkeitspsychologie KOMPAKT. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  157. Seyffert, W. (1998). Lehrbuch der Genetik. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
  158. Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  159. Smillie, L. D., Pickering, A. D., & Jackson, C. J. (2006). The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 320–335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. Smith, D. J., Escott-Price, V., et al. (2016). Genome-wide analysis of over 106 000 individuals identifies 9 neuroticism-associated loci. Molecular Psychiatry, 21, 749–757.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  161. Stemmler, G. (1992). Differential psychophysiology: Persons in situations. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  162. Stemmler, G., Hagemann, D., Amelang, M., & Spinath, F. M. (2016). Differentielle und Persönlichkeitspsychologie (8. überarb. Aufl.). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  163. Tang, W. W. C., Dietmann, S., et al. (2015). A unique gene regulatory network resets the human germline epigenome for development. Cell, 161, 1435–1467.Google Scholar
  164. The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. (2010). A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature, 467, 1061–1073.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  165. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58, 17–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2000). Evolutionary psychology: Foundational papers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  167. Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Briley, D. A. (2014). Continuity of genetic and environmental influences on cognition across the life span: A meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 949–979.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  168. Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 160–164.Google Scholar
  169. Verweij, J. J. H., Zietsch, B. P., et al. (2010). A genome-wide association study of Cloninger’s temperament scales: Implications for the evolutionary genetics of personality. Biological Psychology, 85, 306–331.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  170. Wacker, J., Chavanon, M.-L., & Stemmler, G. (2006). Investigating the dopaminergic basis of extraversion in humans: A multilevel approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 171–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. Waller, N. G. (1999). Evaluating the structure of personality. In C. R. Cloninger (Hrsg.), Personality and psychopathology (S. 155–197). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  172. Watson, J. D., & Crick, F. H. C. (1953). A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171, 737–738.Google Scholar
  173. Weaver, I. C., Cervoni, N., et al. (2004). Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 847–854.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  174. Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  175. Yang, J., Benyamin, B., et al. (2010). Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nature Genetics, 42, 565–569.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  176. Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2011). GCTA: A tool for Genome-wide Complex Trait Analysis. American Journal of Human Genetics, 88, 76–82.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  177. Yehuda, R., Daskalakis, N. P., et al. (2015). Holocaust exposure induced intergenerational effects on FKBP5 methylation. Biological Psychiatry.  doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  178. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  179. Zahavi, A. (2006). Sexual selection, signal selection and the handicap principle. In B. G. M. Jamieson (Hrsg.), Reproductive biology and phylogeny of birds (S. 143–159). Enfield, NH: Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  180. Zell, E., Krizan, Z., & Teeter, S. R. (2015). Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis. American Psychologist, 70, 10–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. Zuckerman, M. (1991, 2005). Psychobiology of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  182. Zuckerman, M. (1992). What is a basic factor and which factors are basic? Turtles all the way down. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 675–681.Google Scholar
  183. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757–768.Google Scholar
  184. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D., Thornquist, M., & Kiers, H. (1991). Five (or three): Robust questionnaire scale factors of personality without culture. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 929–941.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2017

Open Access Dieses Kapitel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell 2.5 International Lizenz (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/deed.de) veröffentlicht, welche die nicht-kommerzielle Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden.

Die in diesem Kapitel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist auch für die oben aufgeführten nicht-kommerziellen Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen.

Authors and Affiliations

  • John F. Rauthmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWake Forest UniversityWinston-Salem, NCUSA

Personalised recommendations