Advertisement

Dispositionales Paradigma

  • John F. Rauthmann
Chapter
Part of the Springer-Lehrbuch book series (SLB)

Zusammenfassung

Das dispositionale Paradigma liefert einen Großteil an wichtigen Ansätzen in der Persönlichkeitspsychologie. So gut wie jeder Persönlichkeitspsychologe muss sich der Frage stellen, was Eigenschaften sind und wie sie funktionieren. Daher häuften sich im Laufe der Zeit zahlreiche Ansätze an, die heute den Kern der Persönlichkeitspsychologie ausmachen. Dieses Kapitel liefert einen ersten Einblick in diese Ansatzvielfalt.

Literatur

  1. Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195–255.Google Scholar
  2. Abelson, R. P. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 129–133.Google Scholar
  3. Achenbach, T. M. (1966). The classification of children’s psychiatric symptoms: A factor-analytic study. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Allport, G. W. (1931). What is a trait of personality? Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25, 368–372.Google Scholar
  5. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  6. Allport, G. W. (1970). Gestalt und Wachstum in der Persönlichkeit. Meisenheim: Hain.Google Scholar
  7. Allport, G., & Odbert, H. (1936). Trait names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, 1–171.Google Scholar
  8. Amelang, M., & Borkenau, P. (1982). Über die faktorielle Struktur und externe Validität einiger Fragebogen-Skalen zur Erfassung von Dimensionen der Extraversion und emotionalen Labilität. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 3, 119–146.Google Scholar
  9. Andresen, B. (2002). HPI. Hamburger Persönlichkeitsinventar. Das NEOCAR Basisfaktor-System. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  10. Angleitner, A., & Riemann, R. (2005). Eigenschaftstheoretische Ansätze. In H. Weber & T. Rammsayer (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Persönlichkeitspsychologie und Differentiellen Psychologie (S. 93–103). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  11. Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15, 169–198.Google Scholar
  12. Asendorpf, J. B., & Neyer, F. J. (2012). Psychologie der Persönlichkeit (5. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327–353.Google Scholar
  14. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Goldberg, L. R., & de Vries, R. E. (2009). Higher-order factors of personality: Do they exist? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 79–91.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139–152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Back, M. D., Baumert, A., et al. (2011). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90–107.Google Scholar
  19. Back, M. D., & Kenny, D. A. (2010). The social relations model: How to understand dyadic processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 855–870.Google Scholar
  20. Back, M. D., & Nestler, S. (2016). Accuracy of judging personality. In J. A. Hall, M. Schmid Mast, & T. V. West (Hrsg.), The social psychology of perceiving others accurately (S. 98–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 533–548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communication in western man. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Hrsg.), Handbook of social psychology (S. 680–740). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Baumeister, R. F. (Hrsg.). (1999). The self in social psychology. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  25. Baumgarten, F. (1933). Die Charaktereigenschaften. In F. Baumgarten (Hrsg.), Beiträge zur Charakter- und Persönlichkeitsforschung (Heft 1, S. 1–81). Bern: A. Franke.Google Scholar
  26. Becker, P. (2003). Trierer Integrierte Persönlichkeitsinventar (TIPI). Manual. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  27. Beckmann, N., Wood, R. E., & Minbashian, A. (2010). It depends how you look at it: On the relationship between neuroticism and conscientiousness at the within- and the between-person levels of analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 593–601.Google Scholar
  28. Benet, V., & Waller, N. G. (1995). The Big-Seven factor model of personality description: Evidence for its cross-cultural generality in a Spanish sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 701–718.Google Scholar
  29. Benet-Martínez, V., & Waller, N. G. (2002). From „adorable“ to „worthless“: Implicit and self-report structure of highly-evaluative personality descriptors. European Journal of Personality, 16, 1–44.Google Scholar
  30. Benet-Martínez, V., Donnellan, M. B., Fleeson, W., Fraley, R. C., Gosling, S. D., King, L. A., Robins, R. W., & Funder, D. C. (2015). Six visions for the future of personality psychology. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper, & R. J. Larsen (Hrsg.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (S. 665–689). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  31. Biesanz, J. C. (2010). The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 853–885.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Block, J. (2010). The five-factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 2–25.Google Scholar
  34. Bollich, K. L., Johannet, P. M., & Vazire, S. (2011). In search of our true selves: Feedback as a path to self-knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 312.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00312.
  35. Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). Das NEO Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI): Handanweisung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  36. Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Brunswik, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50, 255–272.Google Scholar
  38. Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126.Google Scholar
  39. Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1984). Acts, dispositions, and personality. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Hrsg.), Progress in experimental personality research (Bd. 13, S. 241–301). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  40. Buss, D. M., & Plomin, R. (1975). A temperament theory of personal development. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  41. Buss, D. M., & Plomin, R. (1984). Temperament: Early developing personality traits. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Carlson, E. N., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Meta-accuracy: Do we know how others see us? In S. Vazire & T. D. Wilson (Hrsg.), Handbook of self-knowledge (S. 242–257). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  43. Carlson, E. N., Vazire, S., & Furr, R. M. (2011). Meta-insight: Do people really know how others see them? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 831–846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Cattell, R. B. (1946). The description and measurement of personality. New York: World Book.Google Scholar
  45. Cattell, R. B. (1950). Personality: A systematic, theoretical and factual study. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  46. Cattell, R. B. (1973). Die empirische Forschung der Persönlichkeit. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  47. Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16PF). Champaign: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
  48. Cattell, R. B., & Warburton, F. W. (1967). Objective personality and motivation tests. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  49. Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Fan, R., Song, W. Z., Zhang, J. X., & Zhang, J. P. (1996). Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory (CPAI). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 181–199.Google Scholar
  50. Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Wada, S., & Zhang, J. (2003). Indigenous measures of personality assessment in Asian countries: A review. Psychological Assessment, 15, 280–289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2008). Temperament: An organizing paradigm for trait psychology. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (S. 265–286). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  52. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  53. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribers.Google Scholar
  55. Conn, S. R., & Rieke, M. L. (1994). The 16PF fifth edition technical manual. Champaign: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
  56. Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  58. Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five Factor Inventory professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  59. Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1993). Bullish on personality psychology. The Psychologist, 6, 302–303.Google Scholar
  60. Costa, P. T., & Widiger, T. A. (Hrsg.). (2001). Personality disorders and the five factor model of personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  61. Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on „understanding of others“ and „assumed similarity.“ Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177–193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1957). Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  63. Curran, J. P., & Cattell, R. B. (1976). Manual for the Eight State Questionnaire. Champaign: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
  64. de Clercq, B., de Fruyt, F., van Leeuwen, K., & Mervielde, I. (2006). The structure of maladaptive personality traits in childhood: A step toward an integrative developmental perspective for DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 639–657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. de Raad, B. (2000). The Big Five personality factors: The psycholexical approach to personality. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  66. de Raad, B., Barelds, D. P. H., et al. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 160–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. de Raad, B., Barelds, D., Timmerman, M., De Roover, K., Mlacic, B., & Church, A. T. (2014). Towards a pan-cultural personality structure: Input from 11 psycholexical studies. European Journal of Personality, 28, 497–510.Google Scholar
  68. de Raad, B., Mulder, E., Kloosterman, K., & Hofstee, W. K. B. (1988). Personality-descriptive verbs. European Journal of Personality, 2, 81–96.Google Scholar
  69. Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Individual reaction norms underlying the five factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1285–1302.Google Scholar
  70. DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.Google Scholar
  73. Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Dilling, H., Mombour, W., & Schmidt, M. H. (2009). Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen: ICD-10, Kapitel V (F): Klinisch-diagnostische Leitlinien (7. Aufl.). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  75. Dilling, H., Mombour, W., Schmidt, M. H., & Schulte-Markwort, E. (2004). Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen: ICD-10, Kapitel V (F): Diagnostische Kriterien für Forschung und Praxis (3. Aufl.). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  76. Dunkel, C. S., van der Linden, D., Brown, N. A., & Mathes, E. W. (2016). Self-report based general factor of personality as socially desirable responding, positive self-evaluation, and social effectiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 143–147.Google Scholar
  77. Dunlop, W. L. (2015). Lives as the organizing principle in personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 29, 353–357.Google Scholar
  78. Epstein, S. (1973). The self-concept revisited: Or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28, 404–416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Epstein, S. (1998). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In D. Barone & M. Hersen (Hrsg.), Advanced personality. The Plenum series in social/clinical psychology (S. 211–238). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  80. Ewen, R. (2011). An introduction to theories of personality (7. Aufl.). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  81. Eysenck, H. J. (1953). The structure of human personality. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  82. Eysenck, H. J. (1976). Sexualität und Persönlichkeit. Wien: Europa Verlag.Google Scholar
  83. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1969). Personality structure and measurement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  84. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Kent: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  85. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1987). Persönlichkeit und Individualität. München: Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  86. Eysenck, H. J., & Wilson, G. D. (1991). The Eysenck Personality Profiler. London: Corporate Assessment Network.Google Scholar
  87. Eysenck, H. J., Wilson, G. D., & Jackson, C. J. (1998). Eysenck-Personality-Profiler-V6. Mödling: Schuhfried.Google Scholar
  88. Fahrenberg, J. (1964). Objektive Tests zur Messung der Persönlichkeit. In R. Heiß (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie (Bd. 6: Psychologische Diagnostik, S. 488–532). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  89. Falkai, P., & Wittchen, H.-U. (Hrsg.). (2013). Diagnostisches und statistisches Manual psychischer Störungen DSM-5. Hogrefe: Göttingen.Google Scholar
  90. Felson, R. (1985). Reflected appraisal and the development of self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 71–78.Google Scholar
  91. Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Fleeson, W. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate: The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 83–87.Google Scholar
  93. Fleeson, W. (2012). Perspectives on the person: Rapid growth and opportunities for integration. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (S. 33–63). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation of behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Fleeson, W., & Law, M. K. (2015). Trait manifestations as density distributions: The role of actors, situations, and observers in explaining stability and variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1090–1104.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. (2008a). Where does personality have its influence? A supermatrix of consistency concepts. Journal of Personality, 76, 1355–1385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. (2008b). The end of the person-situation debate: An emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1667–1684.Google Scholar
  99. Fiedler, P. (2001). Persönlichkeitsstörungen (5. Aufl.). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  100. Fiedler, P., & Herpertz, S.C. (2016). Persönlichkeitsstörungen (7. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  101. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Fisseni, H.-J. (2003). Persönlichkeitspsychologie: Ein Theorienüberblick (5. unveränd. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  103. Fournier, M. A., Di Domenico, S. I., Weststrate, N. M., Quitasol, M. N., & Dong, M. (2015). Toward a unified science of personality coherence. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 56, 253–262.Google Scholar
  104. Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Funder, D. C. (1999). Personality Judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  106. Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (1983). Behavior as a function of the situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 107–112.Google Scholar
  107. Galton, F. (1884). Measurement of character. Fortnightly Review, 36, 179–185.Google Scholar
  108. Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78.Google Scholar
  109. Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Hrsg.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (S. 141–165). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  110. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.Google Scholar
  111. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. de Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Hrsg.), Personality psychology in Europe (S. 7–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  112. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. C. (2006). The International personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.Google Scholar
  113. Goldsmith, H. H. (1993). Temperament: Variability in developing emotion systems. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Hrsg.), Handbook of emotion (S. 353–364). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  114. Goldsmith, H. H., & Campos, J. (1982). Toward a theory of infant temperament. In R. Emde & R. Harmon (Hrsg.), Attachment and affiliative systems (S. 161–193). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  115. Gore, W. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 816–821.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Gosling, S. D. (2001). From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 45–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Gosling, S. D., Gaddis, S., & Vazire, S. (2008). First impressions based on the environments we create and inhabit. In N. Ambady & J. J. Skowronski (Hrsg.), First impressions (S. 334–356). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  118. Gosling, S. D., & John, O. P. (1999). Personality dimensions in non-human animals: A cross-species review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 69–75.Google Scholar
  119. Gosling, S. D., Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Judgments of personality based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379–398.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.Google Scholar
  121. Greve, W. (2000a). Psychologie des Selbst. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  122. Greve, W. (2000b). Die Psychologie des Selbst: Konturen eines Forschungsthemas. In W. Greve (Hrsg.), Die Psychologie des Selbst (S. 15–36). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  123. Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  124. Guilford, J. P. (1975). Factors and factors of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 802–814.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Guilford, J. S., Zimmerman, W. S., & Guilford, J. P. (1976). The Guilford-Zimmerman temperament survey handbook: Twenty-five years of research and application. San Diego: EdITS Publishers.Google Scholar
  126. Gurtman, M. B. (2009). Exploring personality with the interpersonal circumplex. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 601–619.Google Scholar
  127. Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager-farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 354–370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Häcker, H. O. (2004). Eigenschaftstheorien der Persönlichkeit. In K. Pawlik (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Theorien und Anwendungsfelder der Differentiellen Psychologie (S. 225–275). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  129. Hampson, S. E. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits „get outside the skin“. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315–339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Hannover, B. (1996). Das dynamische Selbst. Zur Kontextabhängigkeit selbstbezogenen Wissens. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  131. Hannover, B., Pöhlmann, C., & Springer, A. (2005). Selbsttheorien der Persönlichkeit. In K. Pawlik (Hrsg.), Theorien und Anwendungsfelder der Differentiellen Psychologie (S. 317–363). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  132. Harkness, A. R., Finn, J. A., McNulty, J. L., & Shields, S. M. (2012). The Personality Psychopathology-Five (PSY-5): Recent constructive replication and assessment literature review. Psychological Assessment, 24, 432–443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Harkness, A. R., McNulty, J. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 scales. Psychological Assessment, 7, 104–114.Google Scholar
  134. Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character. Vol. 1: Studies in deceit. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  135. Haselton, M. G., & Funder, D. C. (2006). The evolution of accuracy and bias in social judgment. In M. Schaller, J. A. Simpson, & D. T. Kenrick (Hrsg.), Evolution and social psychology (S. 15–38). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  136. Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58, 78–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.Google Scholar
  139. Hofstee, W. K. B. (2001). Intelligence and personality: Do they mix? In J. M. Collis & S. Messick (Hrsg.), Intelligence and personality: Bridging the gap in theory and measurement (S. 43–60). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  140. Hofstee, W. K. B., de Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146–163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Horn, J. (1984). Summing up. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 19, 337–343.Google Scholar
  142. Hyman, S. E. (2010). The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  144. Jang, K. L., McCrae, R. R., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Livesley, W. J. (1998). Heritability of facet-level traits in a cross-cultural twin study: Support for a hierarchical model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1556–1565.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. John, O. P., Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2, 171–203.Google Scholar
  146. John, O. P., Naumann, L., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (S. 114–158). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  147. John, O. P., & Naumann, L. P. (2010). Surviving two critiques by block? The resilient big five have emerged as the paradigm for personality trait psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 44–49.Google Scholar
  148. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (S. 102–138). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  149. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.Google Scholar
  150. Josselson, R., & Lieblich, A. (Hrsg.). (1993). The narrative study of lives (Volume 1). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  151. Kagan, J. (1994). Galen’s prophecy. Temperament in human nature. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  152. Kagan, J., & Snidman, N. (2004). The long shadow of temperament. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  153. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  154. Kenny, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1993). Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 145–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Kenrick, D., & Funder, D. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. Klages, L. (1926). Die Grundlagen der Charakterkunde. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
  157. Koch, T., Ortner, T. M., Eid, M., Caspers, J., & Schmitt, M. (2014). Evaluating the construct validity of objective personality tests using a multitrait-multimethod-multioccasion-(MTMM-MO)-approach. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 209–230.Google Scholar
  158. Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2006a). Classification of psychopathology: Melding behavior genetics, personality, and quantitative psychology to develop an empirically-based model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 113–117.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  159. Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2006b). Reinterpreting comorbidity: A model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 111–133.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  160. Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. Krueger, R. F., & Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM–5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477–501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. Lamiell, J. T. (1981). Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality. American Psychologist, 36, 276–289.Google Scholar
  163. Lang, F. R., Lüdtke, O., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2001). Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen. Diagnostica, 47, 111–121.Google Scholar
  164. Lazarus, R. S. (1998). Coping from the perspective of personality. Zeitschrift für Difefrentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 19, 213–231.Google Scholar
  165. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76, 1001–1053.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  167. Leising, D., Scharloth, J., Lohse, O., & Wood, D. (2014). What types of terms do people use when describing an individual’s personality? Psychological Science, 25, 1787–1794.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2016 im Druck). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. Leising, D., & Zimmermann, J. (2011). An integrative conceptual framework for assessing personality and personality pathology. Review of General Psychology, 15, 317–330.Google Scholar
  170. Livesley, W. J., & Jackson, D. N. (2009). Manual for the dimensional assessment of personality pathology – basic questionnaire. Port Huron: Sigma Press.Google Scholar
  171. Loranger, A. W., Sartorius, N., Andreoli, A., et al. (1994). The international personality disorder examination. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 215–224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. Luft, J., & Ingham, H. (1955). The Johari window, a graphic model of interpersonal awareness. In Proceedings of the western training laboratory in group development. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
  173. MacArthur, R., & Wilson, E. O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  174. Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  175. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.Google Scholar
  176. Markus, H., & Kunda, Z. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 858–866.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.Google Scholar
  178. Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.Google Scholar
  179. McAdams, D. P. (1985). Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. Homewood: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  180. McAdams, D. P. (2008). Personal narratives and the life story. In O. John, R. Robins, & L. Pervin (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (S. 241–261). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  181. McAdams, D. P., & Manczak, E. (2015). Personality and the life story. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper, & R. J. Larsen (Hrsg.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (S. 425–446). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
  182. McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  183. McCabe, K. O., & Fleeson, W. (2012). What is extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychological Science, 23, 1498–1505.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  184. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1985). Updating Norman’s „adequate taxonomy“: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710–721.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Hrsg.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (S. 21–50). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  186. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality (S. 139–153). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  187. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (S. 159–181). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  188. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2010). NEO inventories for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R): Professional manual. Lutz: PAR.Google Scholar
  189. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  190. Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., et al. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128–165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  191. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  192. Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1982). Beyond deja vu in the search for cross-situational consistency. Psychological Review, 89, 730–755.Google Scholar
  193. Mõttus, R., Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., Riemann, R., & McCrae, R. R. (2016). Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  194. Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the big one in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233.Google Scholar
  195. Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2013). Applications and extensions of the lens model to understand interpersonal judgments at zero acquaintance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 374–379.Google Scholar
  196. Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  197. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251).Google Scholar
  198. Ortner, T. M., Horn, R., et al. (2007). Standortbestimmung und Zukunft Objektiver Persönlichkeitstests. Report Psychologie, 32, 64–75.Google Scholar
  199. Ortner, T. M., Proyer, R. T., & Kubinger, K. D. (Hrsg.). (2006). Theorie und Praxis Objektiver Persönlichkeitstests. Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  200. Ortner, T. M., & Schmitt, M. (2014). Advances and continuing challenges in objective personality testing (Editorial). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 163–168.Google Scholar
  201. Ostendorf, F. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur. Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit. Regensburg: Roderer.Google Scholar
  202. Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (1992). On the generality and comprehensiveness of the five-factor model of personality: Evidence for five robust factors in questionnaire data. In G. V. Caprara, & G. L. van Heck (Hrsg.), Modern personality psychology. Critical reviews and new directions (S. 73–109). New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  203. Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar (revidierte Form, NEO-PI-R) nach Costa und McCrae. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  204. Ozer, D. J. (1986). Consistency in personality. A methodological framework. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  205. Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  206. Pace, V. L., & Brannick, M. T. (2010). How similar are personality scales of the „same“ construct? A meta-analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 669–676.Google Scholar
  207. Paunonen, S. V., & Hong, R. Y. (2015). On properties of personality traits. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Hrsg.), The APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences (S. 233–259). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  208. Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (2000). What is beyond the big five? Plenty! Journal of Personality, 68, 21–835.Google Scholar
  209. Pervin, L. A., Cervone, D., & John, O. P. (2005). Persönlichkeitstheorien. München: Reinhardt.Google Scholar
  210. Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2005). Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): Entwicklung und Validierung eines ökonomischen Inventars zur Erfassung der fünf Faktoren der Persönlichkeit. Diagnostica, 51, 195–206.Google Scholar
  211. Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212.Google Scholar
  212. Rauthmann, J. F. (2016). Implicit personality development. In J. Specht (Hrsg.), Personality development across the lifespan. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  213. Revelle, W. (1995). Personality processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 295–328.Google Scholar
  214. Revelle, W., & Wilt, J. (2013) The general factor of personality: A general critique. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 493–504.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  215. Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F. Jr., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–336.Google Scholar
  216. Roberts, B. W., Bogg, T., Walton, K., Chernyshenko, O., & Stark, S. (2004). A lexical approach to identifying the lower-order structure of conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 164–178.Google Scholar
  217. Roberts, B., Kuncel, N., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socio-economic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.Google Scholar
  218. Robinson, M. D., & Wilkowski, B. M. (2015). Personality processes and processes as personality: A cognitive perspective. In M. Mikulincer, & P. R. Shaver (Hrsg.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Bd. 4, S. 129–145). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  219. Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Evans, D. E. (2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 122–135.Google Scholar
  220. Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Serien Hrsg.), & N. Eisenberg (Bd. Hrsg.), Handbook of child psychology, vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6. Aufl., S. 99–166). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  221. Ruch, W. (1999). Die revidierte Fassung des Eysenck Personality Questionnaire und die Konstruktion des deutschen EPQ-R bzw. EPQ-RK. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 20, 1–24.Google Scholar
  222. Rushton, J. P. (1985). Differential K Theory: The sociobiology of individual and group differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 441–452.Google Scholar
  223. Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  224. Saucier, G. (2000). Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 366–385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  225. Saucier, G. (2002). Orthogonal markers for orthogonal factors: The case of the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 1–31.Google Scholar
  226. Saucier, G. (2003). An alternative multi-language structure for personality attributes. European Journal of Personality, 17, 179–205.Google Scholar
  227. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Hrsg.), The five-factor model of personality: Perspectives (S. 21–50). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  228. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1998). What is beyond the Big Five? Journal of Personality, 66, 495–524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  229. Saucier, G., Thalmayer, A. G., et al. (2014). A basic bivariate structure of personality attributes evident across nine languages. Journal of Personality, 82, 1–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  230. Schmidt, L. R. (1975). Objektive Persönlichkeitsmessung in diagnostischer und klinischer Psychologie. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  231. Schmitt, M., & Altstötter-Gleich, C. (2010). Differentielle und Persönlichkeitspsychologie KOMPAKT. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  232. Schmukle, S. C., Back, M. D., & Egloff, B. (2008). Validity of the five-factor model for the implicit self-concept of personality. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 263–272.Google Scholar
  233. Schneewind, K. A., & Graf, J. (1998). 16-Persönlichkeits-Factoren-Test Revidierte Fassung Test-Manual. Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  234. Schneewind, K. A., Schröder, G., & Cattell, R. B. (1983). Der 16-Persönlichkeits-Faktoren-Test (16 PF). Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  235. Simms, L. J. (2007). The big seven model of personality and its relevance to personality pathology. Journal of Personality, 75, 65–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  236. Singh, J. K., Misra, G., & de Raad, B. (2013). Personality structure in the trait lexicon of Hindi, a major language spoken in India. European Journal of Personality, 27, 605–620.Google Scholar
  237. Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2016, im Druck). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  238. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 8, 220–247.Google Scholar
  239. Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (1987). Reexamining basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Paper presented at the 95th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.Google Scholar
  240. Terracciano, A., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2006). Longitudinal trajectories in Guilford-Zimmerman temperament survey data: Results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 61, 108–116.Google Scholar
  241. Thagard, P., & Wood, J. V. (2015). Eighty phenomena about the self: Representation, evaluation, regulation, and change. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00334.
  242. Thalmayer, A. G., & Saucier, G. (2014). The questionnaire big six in 26 nations: Developing cross-culturally applicable big six, big five and big two inventories. European Journal of Personality, 28, 497–510.Google Scholar
  243. Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  244. Tomkins. S. S. (1979). Script theory: Differential magnification of affects. In H. E. HoweJr. & R. A. Dienstbier (Hrsg.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Bd. 26). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  245. Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings (USAF ASD Tech. Rep. No. 61–97). Lackland Air Force Base: U.S. Air Force.Google Scholar
  246. Uher, J. (2008a). Comparative personality research: Methodological approaches (Target article). European Journal of Personality, 22, 427–455.Google Scholar
  247. Uher, J. (2008b). Three methodological core issues of comparative personality research. European Journal of Personality, 22, 475–496.Google Scholar
  248. Uher, J., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Personality assessment in the Great Apes: Comparing ecologically valid behavior measures, behavior ratings, and adjective ratings. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 821–838.Google Scholar
  249. Uher, J., Asendorpf, J. B., & Call, J. (2008). Personality in the behaviour of great apes: Temporal stability, cross-situational consistency and coherence in response. Animal Behaviour, 75, 99–112.Google Scholar
  250. van der Linden, D., Dunkel, C. S., & Petrides, K. V. (2016). The General Factor of Personality (GFP) as social effectiveness: Review of the literature. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 98–105.Google Scholar
  251. van der Linden, D., te Nijenhuis, J., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 315–327.Google Scholar
  252. Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The Self-Other Knowledge Asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281–300.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  253. Vazire, S., & Wilson, T. D. (Hrsg.). (2012). Handbook of self-knowledge. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  254. Verbeke, L., & de Clercq, B. (2014). Integrating oddity traits in a dimensional model for personality pathology precursors. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, 598–612.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  255. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Chmielewski, M. (2008). Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology: II. Further articulation of a comprehensive unified trait structure. Journal of Personality, 76, 1545–1585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  256. Weiss, A., Inoue-Murayama, M., King, J. E., Adams, M. J., & Matsuzawa, T. (2012). All too human? Chimpanzee and orang-utan personalities are not anthropomorphic projections. Animal Behaviour, 83, 1355–1365.Google Scholar
  257. Weiss, A., & King, J. E. (2015). Great Ape origins of personality maturation and sex differences: A study of orangutans and chimpanzees. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 648–664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  258. Weiss, A., King, J. E., & Murray, L. (2011). Personality and temperament in nonhuman primates. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  259. Widiger, T. A., & Costa, P. T. (1994). Personality and personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 78–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  260. Widiger, T. A., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2012). Integrating normal and abnormal personality structure: The five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 80, 1471–1506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  261. Widiger, T. A., Frances, A. J., et al. (1991). Toward an empirical classification of the DSM-IV. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 280–288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  262. Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  263. Widiger, T. A., Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2002). A proposal for Axis II: Diagnosing personality disorders using the five factor model. In P. T. Costa & T. A. Widiger (Hrsg.), Personality disorders and the five factor model of personality (S. 431–456). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  264. Wiggins, J. S. (1995). Interpersonal adjective scales professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  265. Wiggins, J. S. (1996). An informal history of the interpersonal circumplex tradition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 217–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  266. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  267. Wilt, J., & Revelle, W. (2015). Affect, behavior, cognition and desire in the Big Five: An analysis of item content and structure. European Journal of Personality, 29, 478497.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  268. Wood, D. (2015). Testing the lexical hypothesis: Are socially important traits more densely reflected in the English lexicon? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 317–335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  269. Wood, D., & Furr, R. M. (2016). The correlates of similarity estimates are often misleadingly positive: The nature and scope of the problem, and some solutions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 79–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  270. Wood, D., Gardner, M. H., & Harms, P. D. (2015). How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation. Psychological Review, 122, 84–111.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  271. Wright, A. G. C., Calabrese, W. R., Rudick, M. M., Yam, W. H., Zelazny, K., Rotterman, J., & Simms, L. J. (2015). Stability of the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality traits and their longitudinal associations with functioning in personality disordered individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 199–207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  272. Wright, A. G. C., & Simms, L. J. (2014). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 trait models. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 43–54.Google Scholar
  273. Wright, A. G. C., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K. E., Pincus, A. L., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951–957.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  274. Zentner, M., & Bates, J. E. (2008). Child temperament: An integrative review of concepts, research programs, and measures. European Journal of Developmental Science, 2, 7–37.Google Scholar
  275. Zimmermann, J., Altenstein, D., et al. (2014a). The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits: Findings from two German-speaking samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 518–540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  276. Zimmermann, J., Masuhr, O., Jaeger, U., Leising, D., Benecke, C., & Spitzer, C. (2014b). Maladaptive Persönlichkeitseigenschaften gemäß DSM-5: Zusammenhänge mit psychischer Belastung und ICD-10 Diagnosen in einer klinischen Stichprobe. Persönlichkeitsstörungen: Theorie und Therapie, 18, 46–58.Google Scholar
  277. Zuckerman, M. (1984). Sensation seeking: A comparative approach to a human trait. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 413–471.Google Scholar
  278. Zuroff, D. C. (1986). Was Gordon Allport a trait theorist? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 993–1000.Google Scholar
  279. Zuckerman, M. (1984). Sensation seeking: A comparative approach to a human trait. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 413–471.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2017

Open Access Dieses Kapitel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell 2.5 International Lizenz (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/deed.de) veröffentlicht, welche die nicht-kommerzielle Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden.

Die in diesem Kapitel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist auch für die oben aufgeführten nicht-kommerziellen Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen.

Authors and Affiliations

  • John F. Rauthmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWake Forest UniversityWinston-Salem, NCUSA

Personalised recommendations