Advertisement

Transaktionales Paradigma

  • John F. Rauthmann
Chapter
Part of the Springer-Lehrbuch book series (SLB)

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel gibt einen Überblick über das transaktionale Paradigma, das sich mit dynamischen Wechselwirkungen von Personenmerkmalen (z. B. Biologie, Persönlichkeit, Verhalten) und Umweltmerkmalen (z. B. Situationen, Beziehungen, Kultur) beschäftigt. Es handelt sich um eines der modernen Paradigmen, das derzeit am stärksten in der Persönlichkeitspsychologie wächst. Die Beliebtheit dieses Paradigmas gründet sich in seinem weiten Anwendungsbereich auf verschiedenste Forschungsfragen (z. B. Persönlichkeit und soziale Beziehungen, Persönlichkeitsentwicklung), was das Paradigma inhaltlich aber auch sehr heterogen erscheinen lässt.

Literatur

  1. Allik, J., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 13–28.Google Scholar
  2. Asendorpf, J. B. (2005). Persönlichkeit: Stabilität und Veränderung. In H. Weber & T. Rammsayer (Hrsg.), andbuch der Persönlichkeitspsychologie und Differentiellen Psychologie (S. 15–26). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  3. Asendorpf, J. B., & Neyer, F. J. (2012). Psychologie der Persönlichkeit (5. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Back, M. D., Baumert, A., et al. (2011). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90–107.Google Scholar
  5. Back, M. D., & Vazire, S. (2015). The social consequences of personality: Six suggestions for future research. European Journal of Personality, 29, 296–307.Google Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Benet-Martínez, V., Donnellan, M. B., Fleeson, W., Fraley, R. C., Gosling, S. D., King, L. A., Robins, R. W., & Funder, D. C. (2015). Six visions for the future of personality psychology. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper, & R. J. Larsen (Hrsg.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (S. 665–689). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  8. Benet-Martínez, V., & Hong, Y.-Y. (Hrsg.). (2014). Handbook of multi-cultural identity: Basic and applied psychological perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Benet-Martínez, V., & Oishi, S. (2008). Culture and personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (S. 542–567). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  10. Bleidorn, W. (2015). What accounts for personality maturation in early adulthood? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 245–252.Google Scholar
  11. Bleidorn, W., Klimstra, T. A., Denissen, J. J. A., Rentfrow, P. J., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2013). Personality maturation around the world: A cross-cultural examination of social investment theory. Psychological Science, 24, 2530–2540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Briley, D. A., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2014). Genetic and environmental continuity in personality development: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1303–1331.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Briley, D. A., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2016). Comparing the developmental genetics of cognition and personality over the life span. Journal of Personality. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12186. PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. Annals of Child Development, 6, 187–249.Google Scholar
  17. Buss, D. M. (1987). Selection, evocation and manipulation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 53, 1214–1221.Google Scholar
  18. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Control processes and self-organization as complementary principles underlying behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 304–315.Google Scholar
  20. Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (1993). When do individual differences matter? A paradoxical theory of personality coherence. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 247–271.Google Scholar
  21. Caspi, A., & Roberts, B. W. (2001). Personality development across the life span: The argument for change and continuity. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 49–66.Google Scholar
  22. Church, A. T. (2000). Culture and personality: Toward an integrated cultural trait psychology. Journal of Personality, 68, 651–703.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Church, A. T. (2001). Personality measurement in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Personality, 69, 979–1006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Church, A. T. (2016). Personality traits across cultures. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 22–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., et al. (2006). Implicit theories and self-perceptions of traitedness across cultures: Toward integration of cultural and trait psychology perspectives. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 694–716.Google Scholar
  26. Church, A. T., & Ortiz, F. A. (2005). Culture and personality. In V. J. Derlaga, B. A. Winstead, & W. H. Jones (Hrsg.), Personality: Contemporary theory and research (S. 420–456). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  27. Conley, J. J. (1984). The hierarchy of consistency: A review and model of longitudinal findings on adult individual differences in intelligence, personality and self-opinion. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 11–25.Google Scholar
  28. Cooper, W. H., & Withey, M. J. (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 62–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cramer, A. O. J., van der Sluis, S., et al. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people. European Journal of Personality, 26, 414–431.Google Scholar
  30. Dalal, R. S., Meyer, R. D., Bradshaw, R. P., Green, J. P., Kelly, E. D., & Zhu, M. (2015). Personality strength and situational influences on behavior a conceptual review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41, 261–287.Google Scholar
  31. Denissen, J. J. A., van Aken, M. A. G., Penke, L., & Wood, D. (2013). Self-regulation underlies temperament and personality: An integrative developmental framework. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 255–260.Google Scholar
  32. DeYoung, C. G. (2010). Toward a theory of the Big Five. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 26–33.Google Scholar
  33. DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five Theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.Google Scholar
  34. Dörner, D. (1999). Bauplan für eine Seele. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  35. Dörner, D., Schaub, H., Stäudel, T., & Strohschneider, S. (1988). Ein System zur Handlungsregulation oder – Die Interaktion von Emotion, Kognition und Motivation. Sprache und Kognition, 7, 217–232.Google Scholar
  36. Edmonds, G., Jackson, J. J., Fayard, J. V., & Roberts, B. W. (2008). Is character fate, or is there hope to change my personality yet? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 399–413.Google Scholar
  37. Endler, N., & Hunt, J. (1968). S-R inventories of hostility and comparisons of the proportions of variance from persons, responses, and situations for hostility and anxiousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 309–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Endler, N., & Hunt, J. (1969). Generalizability of contributions from sources of variance in the S-R Inventory of Anxiousness. Journal of Personality, 37, 1–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Endler, N., Hunt, J., & Rosenstein, A. (1962). An S-R inventory of anxiousness. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 76, 1–33.Google Scholar
  40. Endler, N., & Magnusson, D. (1976). Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 956–974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Fajkowska, M. (2015). The complex-system approach to personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 15–32.Google Scholar
  42. Ferguson, C. J. (2010). A meta-analysis of normal and disordered personality across the life span. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 98, 659–667.Google Scholar
  43. Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. (2008). The end of the person-situation debate: An emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1667–1684.Google Scholar
  44. Fraley, R. C., & Roberts, B. W. (2005). Patterns of continuity: A dynamic model for conceptualizing the stability of individual differences in psychological constructs across the life course. Psychological Review, 112, 60–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132–154.Google Scholar
  46. Gallagher, P., Fleeson, W., & Hoyle, R. (2011). A self ‐regulatory mechanism for personality trait stability: Contra‐trait effort. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 335–342.Google Scholar
  47. Gebauer, J. E., Bleidorn, W., Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., Lamb, M. E., & Potter, J. (2014). Cross-cultural variations in big five relationships with religiosity: A sociocultural motives perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 1064–1091.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Gillath, O., Karantzas, G., & Fraley, R. C. (2016). Adult attachment: A concise guide to theory and research. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. Greenfield, P. M. (2000). Three approaches to the psychology of culture: Where do they come from? Where can they go? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 223–240.Google Scholar
  50. Haken, H., & Schiepek, G. (2006). Synergetik in der Psychologie. Selbstorganisation verstehen und gestalten. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  51. Hartshorne, H., & May, M. A. (1928). Studies in the nature of character. Vol. 1: Studies in deceit. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  52. Headey, B. (2006). Subjective well-being: Revisions to dynamic equilibrium theory using national panel data and panel regression methods. Social Indicators Research, 79, 369–403.Google Scholar
  53. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–739.Google Scholar
  54. Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparison of subjective Likert scales? The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903–918.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Hennecke, M., Bleidorn, W., Denissen, J. J. A., & Wood, D. (2014). A three-part framework for self-regulated personality development across adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 28, 289–299.Google Scholar
  56. Herskovits, M. J. (1948). Man and his works: The science of cultural anthropology. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  57. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  59. Hogan, R. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. M. Page (Hrsg.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1982: Personality-current theory and research (S. 55–89). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  60. Hogan, R., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). A socioanalytic model of maturity. Journal of Career Assessment, 12, 207–217.Google Scholar
  61. Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 490–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2016a, im Druck). Volitional personality change. In J. Specht (Hrsg.), Personality development across the lifespan.Google Scholar
  63. Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2016b). Changing for the better? Longitudinal associations between volitional personality change and psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 603–615.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Hudson, N. W., & Roberts, B. W. (2014). Goals to change personality traits: Concurrent links between personality traits, daily behavior, and goals to change oneself. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 68–83.Google Scholar
  65. Ickes, W., Snyder, M., & Garcia, S. (1997). Personality influence on the choice of situations. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality psychology (S. 165–195). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  66. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  67. Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (2001). Trait-state models for longitudinal data. In A. Sayer & L. M. Collins (Hrsg.), New methods for the analysis of change (S. 243–263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  68. Kenrick, D., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23–34.Google Scholar
  69. Klir, J. (1991). Facets of systems science. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  70. Krampen, G. (1993). Lern-, handlungs- und regulationspsychologische Modelle in der Differentiellen Psychologie und Persönlichkeitspsychologie. Trier Psychologische Berichte, 20(1).Google Scholar
  71. Krampen, G. (2004). Lerntheorien der Persönlichkeit. In K. Pawlik (Hrsg.), Theorien und Anwendungsfelder der Differentiellen Psychologie (S. 277–316). Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  72. Kuhl, J. (2001). Motivation und Persönlichkeit. Interaktionen psychischer Systeme. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  73. Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (Hrsg.). (1994). Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  74. Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (2009). Persönlichkeits-Stil-und-Störungsinventar (PSSI). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  75. Lazarus, R. S., & Launier, R. (1978). Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In L. A. Pervin & M. Lewis (Hrsg.), Perspectives in interactional psychology (S. 287–327). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  76. LeVine, R. A. (2001). Culture and personality studies, 1918–1960: Myth and history. Journal of Personality, 69, 803–818.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Lievens, F., Chasteen, C. S., Day, E., & Christiansen, N. D. (2006). Large-scale investigation of the role of trait activation theory for understanding assessment center convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 247–258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Lilienfeld, S. O., Sauvigné, K. C., Lynn, S. J., Cautin, R. L., Latzman, R. D., & Waldman, I. D. (2015). Fifty psychological and psychiatric terms to avoid: A list of inaccurate, misleading, misused, ambiguous, and logically confused words and phrases. Frontiers in Psycholology, 6, 1100.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01100. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Little, B. R. (2015). The integrative challenge in personality science: Personal projects as units of analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 93–101.Google Scholar
  80. Lluís-Font, J. M. (2005). Personality: Systems net theory. Individual Differences Research, 3, 213–238.Google Scholar
  81. Magidson, J. F., Roberts, B. W., Collado-Rodriguez, A., & Lejuez, C. W. (2014). Theory-driven intervention for changing personality: Expectancy value theory, behavioral activation, and conscientiousness. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1442–1450.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Magnusson, D., & Endler, N. (Hrsg.). (1977). Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  83. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.Google Scholar
  84. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1998). The cultural psychology of personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 63–87.Google Scholar
  85. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Culture and self: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 420–430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Mayer, J. D. (1993–1994). A system-topics framework for the study of personality. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 13, 99–123.Google Scholar
  87. Mayer, J. D. (1995a). A system-topics framework and the structural arrangement of systems within and around personality. Journal of Personality, 63, 459–493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Mayer, J. D. (1995b). A framework for the classification of personality components. Journal of Personality, 63, 819–873.Google Scholar
  89. Mayer, J. D. (1998). A systems framework for the field of personality psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 118–144.Google Scholar
  90. Mayer, J. D. (2001). Primary divisions of personality and their scientific contributions: From the trilogy-of-mind to the systems set. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31, 449–477.Google Scholar
  91. Mayer, J. D. (2003). Structural divisions of personality and the classification of traits. Review of General Psychology, 7, 381–401.Google Scholar
  92. Mayer, J. D. (2004). How does psychotherapy influence personality? A theoretical integration. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1291–1315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Mayer, J. D. (2005). A tale of two visions: Can a new view of personality help integrate psychology? American Psychologist, 80, 294–307.Google Scholar
  94. Mayer, J. D. (2015). The personality systems framework: Current theory and development. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 4–14.Google Scholar
  95. Mayer, J. D. (2017). Personality: A systems approach. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  96. Mayer, J. D., & Korogodsky, M. (2011). A really big picture of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Compass, 5, 104–117.Google Scholar
  97. McAdams, D. P. (2015a). The art and science of personality development. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  98. McAdams, D. P. (2015b). Three lines of personality development: A conceptual itinerary. European Psychologist, 20, 252–264.Google Scholar
  99. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  100. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Hrsg.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (S. 51–87). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  101. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (S. 159–181). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  102. McCrae, R. R., et al. (1999). Age differences in personality across the adult life span: Parallels in five cultures. Developmental Psychology, 35, 466–477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., Ostendorf, F., et al. (2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life-span development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 173–186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. McCrae, R. R., Terraciano, A., & 79 members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547–561.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Meindl, P., Jayawickreme, E., Furr, R. M., & Fleeson, W. (2015). A foundation beam for studying morality from a personological point of view: Are individual differences in moral behaviors and thoughts consistent? Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 486–502.Google Scholar
  106. Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2010). A Review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36, 121–140.Google Scholar
  107. Miller, J. G. (1997). Theoretical issues in cultural psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Hrsg.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (S. 85–128). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  108. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  109. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.Google Scholar
  110. Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Hrsg.), Personality at the cross-roads: Current issues in interactional psychology (S. 333–352). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  111. Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person (Prefatory Chapter). Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1–22.Google Scholar
  112. Mischel, W. (2009). From personality and assessment (1968) to personality science, 2009. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 282–290.Google Scholar
  113. Mischel, W., & Morf, C. C. (2003). The self as a psychosocial dynamic processing system. A meta-perspective on a century of self in psychology. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Hrsg.), Handbook of self and identity (S. 15–43). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  114. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1999). Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within a unified theory of personality: The cognitive–affective personality system. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (S. 197–218). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  116. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (2008). Toward a unifying theory of personality: Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within the cognitive-affective processing system. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality psychology (S. 208–241). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  117. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Mendoza-Denton, R. (2002). Situation-behavior profiles as a locus of consistency in personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 50–54.Google Scholar
  118. Moskowitz, D. S., & Fournier, M. A. (2014). The interplay of persons and situations: Retrospect and prospect. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Hrsg.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences (S. 471–489). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  119. Nowak, A., Vallacher, R. R., & Zochowski, M. (2005). The emergence of personality: Dynamic foundations of individual variation. Developmental Review, 25, 351–385.Google Scholar
  120. Olweus, D. (1977). A critical analysis of the modern interactionist position. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Hrsg.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (S. 221–233). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  121. Ormel, J., Riese, H., & Rosmalen, J. G. M. (2012). Interpreting neuroticism scores across the adult life course: Immutable or experience-dependent set points of negative affect? Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 71–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  123. Pervin, L. A. (1968). Performance and satisfaction as a function of individual environment fit. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 56–68.Google Scholar
  124. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., & Loehlin, J. C. (1977). Genotype-environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 309–322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Quirin, M., & Kuhl, J. (2009). Theorie der Persönlichkeits-System-Interaktionen. In V. Brandstätter-Morawietz & J. H. Otto (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie: Motivation und Emotion (S. 157–162). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  126. Rauthmann, J. F. (2015). Persönlichkeit als informationsprozessierendes System: ein systemisch-synergetischer Zugang. Journal Psychologie des Alltagshandelns/Psychology of everyday activity, 8, 36–64.Google Scholar
  127. Rauthmann, J. F., & Sherman, R. A. (2016). Situation change: Stability and change of situation variables between and within persons. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1938.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01938. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  128. Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (2002). Virtual personalities: A neural network model of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 357–369.Google Scholar
  129. Read, S. J., Monroe, B. M., Brownstein, A. L., Yang, Y., Chopra, G., & Miller, L. C. (2010). A neural network model of the structure and dynamics of human personality. Psychological Review, 117, 61–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Read, S. J., Vanman, E. J., & Miller, L. C. (1997). Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes and gestalt principles: (Re)introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 26–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Revelle, W., & Condon, D. M. (2015). A model for personality at three levels. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 70–81.Google Scholar
  132. Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F. Jr., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–336.Google Scholar
  133. Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Roberts, B. W., & Jackson, J. J. (2008). Sociogenomic personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 76, 1523–1544.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  135. Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socio-economic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.Google Scholar
  136. Roberts, B.W., Luo, J., Briley, D.A., Chow, P., Su, R., & Hill, P.L. (im Druck). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin.Google Scholar
  137. Roberts, B. W., & Robins, R. W. (2004). A longitudinal study of person-environment fit and personality development. Journal of Personality, 72, 89–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life-course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Roberts, B. W., & Wood, D. (2006). Personality development in the context of the neo-socioanalytic model of personality. In D. Mroczek & T. Little (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality development (S. 11–39). Mahwah: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  140. Rowe, D. C., Vazsonyi, A. T., & Flannery, D. J. (1994). No more than skin deep: Ethnic and racial similarity in developmental process. Psychological Review, 101, 396–413.Google Scholar
  141. Sameroff, A. J. (1983). Developmental systems: Contexts and evolution. In W. Kessen (Hrsg.), Handbook of child psychology. History, theory, and methods (S. 237–294). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  142. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Hrsg.), The five-factor model of personality: Perspectives (S. 21–50). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  143. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality, 69, 847–879.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype-environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  145. Schaub, H. (2001). Persönlichkeit und Problemlösen: Persönlichkeitsfaktoren als Parameter eines informationsverarbeitenden Systems. Weinheim: Beltz, Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  146. Schaub, H. (2003). Persönlichkeit als Informationsverarbeitung: Persönlichkeit als Muster von Parametern eines informationsverarbeitenden Systems. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 185–195.Google Scholar
  147. Schmitt, M. (2005). Interaktionistische Ansätze. In H. Weber & T. Rammsayer (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Persönlichkeitspsychologie und Differentiellen Psychologie (S. 104–115). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  148. Schmitt, M., & Altstötter-Gleich, C. (2010). Differentielle und Persönlichkeitspsychologie KOMPAKT. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  149. Seligman, M. E. P. (1995). The effectiveness of psychotherapy: The Consumer Reports study. American Psychologist, 50, 965–974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. Shoda, Y. (2007). Computational modeling of personality as a dynamical system. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. Kruger (Hrsg.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (S. 633–651). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  151. Shoda, Y., Cervone, D., & Downey, G. (Hrsg.). (2007). Persons in context: Building a science of the individual. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  152. Shoda, Y., LeeTiernan, S., & Mischel, W. (2002). Personality as a dynamical system: Emergence of stability and constancy from intra- and inter-personal interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 316–325.Google Scholar
  153. Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (2006). Applying meta-theory to achieve generalisability and precision in personality science. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 439–452.Google Scholar
  154. Shoda, Y., Wilson, N. L., Whitsett, D. D., Lee-Dussud, J., & Zayas, V. (2014). The person as a cognitive-affective processing system: From quantitative idiography to cumulative science. In M. L. Cooper & R. J. Larsen (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality processes and individual differences (S. 491–513). Washington, DC: APA Press.Google Scholar
  155. Specht, J., Bleidorn, W., et al. (2014). What drives adult personality development? A comparison of theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. European Journal of Personality, 28, 216–230.Google Scholar
  156. Srivastava, S., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1041–1053.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. Steyer, R., Ferring, D., & Schmitt, M. (1992). States and traits in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8, 79–98.Google Scholar
  158. Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., & Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389–408.Google Scholar
  159. Strunk, G., & Schiepek, G. (2006). Systemische Psychologie. Einführung in die komplexen Grundlagen menschlichen Verhaltens. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  160. Swann, W. B. Jr., & Seyle, C. (2005). Personality psychology’s comeback and its emerging symbiosis with social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 155–165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. Terracciano, A., Abdel-Khalek, A. M., Adam, N., Adamovova, L., Ahn, C. K., Ahn, H. N., … & Avia, M. D. (2005). National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures. Science, 310(5745), 96–100.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  162. Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  163. Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 397–423.Google Scholar
  164. Tett, R. P., Simonet, D. V., Walser, B., & Brown, C. (2013). Trait activation theory: Applications, further developments, and implications for person-workplace fit. In N. D. Christiansen & R. P. Tett (Hrsg.), A handbook of personality at work (S. 71–100). New York: Taylor-Francis.Google Scholar
  165. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  166. Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407–415.Google Scholar
  167. Triandis, H. C., & Suh, E. M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 133–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  168. Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Briley, D. A. (2014). Continuity of genetic and environmental influences on cognition across the life span: A meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 949–979.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  169. Vallacher, R. R., Read, S. J., & Nowak, A. (2002). The dynamical perspective in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 264–273.Google Scholar
  170. van Egeren, L. F. (2009). A cybernetic model of global personality traits. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 92–108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  171. von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
  172. Wagner, J., Ram, N., Smith, J., & Gerstorf, D. (2016). Personality Trait Development at the End of Life: Antecedents and Correlates of Mean-Level Trajectories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 411–429.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  173. Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Model, methods, and finding. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  174. Wampold, B. E. (2010). The basics of psychotherapy: An introduction to theory and practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  175. Waszkewitz, B. (2003a). Psychologie der Persönlichkeit. Stuttgart: Ibidem.Google Scholar
  176. Waszkewitz, B. (2003b). Mathematik und EDV in der Psychologie. Bedeutung und Möglichkeiten mathematischer Darstellungen am Beispiel der Persönlichkeitspsychologie. Stuttgart: Ibidem.Google Scholar
  177. Waszkewitz, B. (2006a). Arbeitsbuch zu Systemen, Informationen und Modellen. Stuttgart: Ibidem.Google Scholar
  178. Waszkewitz, B. (2006b). Arbeitsbuch zu Persönlichkeit, Begabungen, Lernen, Denken, Entwicklung und Diagnostik. Stuttgart: Ibidem.Google Scholar
  179. Waszkewitz, B. (2006c). Ansätze zur Veranschaulichung abstrakter Systeme am Beispiel der Persönlichkeit. Stuttgart: Ibidem.Google Scholar
  180. Weiss, A., & King, J. E. (2015). Great ape origins of personality maturation and sex differences: A study of orangutans and chimpanzees. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 648–664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  181. Wiggins, J. S. (1997). In defense of traits. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Hrsg.), Handbook of personality psychology (S. 95–115). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  182. Wood, D., & Roberts, B. W. (2006). Cross-sectional and longitudinal tests of the personality and role identity structural model (PRISM). Journal of Personality, 74, 779–809.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  183. Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. W. (im Druck, 2016). Processes of Personality Development in Adulthood The TESSERA Framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review.Google Scholar
  184. Zayas, V., Shoda, Y., & Ayduk, O. N. (2002). Personality in context: An interpersonal systems perspective. Journal of Personality, 70, 851–900.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2017

Open Access Dieses Kapitel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell 2.5 International Lizenz (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/deed.de) veröffentlicht, welche die nicht-kommerzielle Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden.

Die in diesem Kapitel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist auch für die oben aufgeführten nicht-kommerziellen Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen.

Authors and Affiliations

  • John F. Rauthmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWake Forest UniversityWinston-Salem, NCUSA

Personalised recommendations