Advertisement

Viele Köche verderben den Brei

  • Tabea MehrbrodtEmail author
Chapter
  • 5.2k Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Gegensätzliche, häufig gebrauchte Sprichwörter wie „Viele Köche verderben den Brei“ und „Viele Jäger sind des Hasen Tod“ werfen die Fragen auf, ob und unter welchen Bedingungen Einzel- oder Gruppenleistung effizienter ist. Der Einfluss der Gruppe an sich (Gruppengröße und Gruppenzusammensetzung), des Aufgabentyps, der Ab- bzw. Anwesenheit einer Führungskraft sowie der Umweltgegebenheiten auf das Leistungsergebnis werden behandelt und Prozessgewinne bzw. -verluste im Rahmen von Gruppenleistung diskutiert.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin 94(2), 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowers, C. A., Pharmer, J. A., & Salas, E. (2000). When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research 31(3), 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Collins, B. E., & Guetzkow, H. S. (1964). A social psychology of group processes for decision-making. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Cottrell, N. B., Wack, D. L., Sekerak, G. J., & Rittle, R. H. (1968). Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9(3), 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(3), 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grössle, H. K. (1957). Die Gruppenstruktur des Industriebetriebes. In H. K. Grössle (Hrsg.), Der Mensch in der industriellen Fertigung (S. 54–95). Wiesbaden: Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Heeg, F. J. (Ed.). (1993). Handbuch Personal-und Organisationsentwicklung. Dresden: Klett.Google Scholar
  9. Hertel, G., & Scholl, W. (2006). Grundlagen der Gruppenarbeit in Organisationen. In B. Zimolong, & U. Konradt (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Band II: Ingenieurpsychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  10. James, J. (1951). A preliminary study of the size determinant in small group interaction. American Sociological Review 47, 4–477.Google Scholar
  11. Janis, I. L. (1971). Groupthink. Psychology Today 5(6), 43–46.Google Scholar
  12. Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(6), 822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leach, D. J., Wall, T. D., Rogelberg, S. G., & Jackson, P. R. (2005). Team autonomy, performance, and member job strain: Uncovering the teamwork KSA link. Applied Psychology 54(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lippit, R., & White, R. K. (1943). The social climate of children’s groups. Journal of Social Psychology 10, 271–301.Google Scholar
  15. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(4), 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and social Psychology 44(1), 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Köhler, O. (1926). Kraftleistungen bei Einzel- und Gruppenarbeit. Industrielle Psychotechnik 3, 274–282.Google Scholar
  18. Messé, L. A., Hertel, G., Kerr, N. L., Lount, R. B., & Park, E. S. (2002). Knowledge of partner′s ability as a moderator of group motivation gains: An exploration of the Köhler discrepancy effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6), 935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review 21(2), 402–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman Jr, A. M. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. London: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 12(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (2003). Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psychological Inquiry 14(3–4), 304–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology 33(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology 9(4), 507–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1988). The new leadership: Managing participation in organizations. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2013). A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology 99(2): 181–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61(4), 570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science149, 269–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tel Aviv-YafoDeutschland

Personalised recommendations