Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten und Schreiben pp 207–221Cite as

Reviews

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studium Pflege, Therapie, Gesundheit ((SPTG))

Zusammenfassung

Ist das Ziel eines Forschungsvorhabens, sich mit bereits bestehender Literatur kritisch auseinanderzusetzten, existieren dazu unterschiedliche Verfahren der Literaturstudien und Reviews. Dieser Abschnitt des Buches beschreibt diese unterschiedlichen Arten von Reviews, ihre Durchführung sowie ihre Bedeutung als eigene Forschungsmethode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Literatur

  • Al-Nawas B, Baulig C, Krummenauer F (2010) Von der Übersichtsarbeit zur Meta-Analyse – Möglichkeiten und Risiken. Zeitschrift für zahnärztliche Implantologie 26 (4): 400–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell BJ, Muhunthan J, Irving M, Eades S, Jan S (2014) Global systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of indigenous health interventions. PloS One 9 (11): e111249

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research 8 (1): 19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, Engel M, Fretheim A, Volmink J (2008) Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology 8 (1): 21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bagayoko ND, Brockmeier SF (2012) Current controversies in the management of lateral epicondylitis. Current Orthopaedic Practice 23 (5): 480–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barroso J, Gollop CJ, Sandelowski M, Meynell J, Pearce PF, Collins LJ (2003) The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies. Western Journal of Nursing Research 25 (2): 153–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellini JL, Rumrill PD (2009) Research in rehabilitation counseling: a guide to design, methodology, and utilization, 2nd ed. Charles C Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A (2012) Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breuer J, Piso B (2013) Ergotherapie bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Literaturübersicht zu Indikationen, Inanspruchnahme und Empfehlungen. HTA-Projektbericht, Nr. 70. Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Helth Technology Assessment, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Case-Smith J, Arbesman M (2008) Evidence based review of intervention for autism used in or of relevance to occupational therapy. Autism Research and Treatment 62 (4): 416–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Daudt HML, van Mossel C, Scott SJ (2013) Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology 13 (48): 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • De Souza M, Da Silva M (2010) Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? Einstein 8 (1 Pt 1): 102–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon L, Duncan D, Johnson P, Kirkby L, O’Connell H, Taylor H, Deane KHO (2007) Occupational therapy for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3): CD002813

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, Jones DR, Miller T, Sutton AJ et al. (2006) How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research 6 (1): 27–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough D (2007) Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Research Papers in Education 22 (2): 213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R (2005) Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social Science & Medicine 61 (2): 417–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges H, Cooper LV (2009) Research synthesis as a scientific process. In: Hedges H, Cooper LV, Valentine JC (eds) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 4–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt G, Sims S, Harris R (2014) Using realist synthesis to understand the mechanisms of interprofessional teamwork in health and social care. Journal of Interprofessional Care 28 (6): 501–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins JPT, Green S (2008) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jesson J, Matheson L, Lacey FM (2011) Doing your literature review: traditional and systematic techniques. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G (2013) Systematische Übersichten und Meta-Analysen: ein Handbuch für Ärzte in Klinik und Praxis sowie Experten im Gesundheitswesen. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang R, O’Reilly M, Healy O, Rispoli M, Lydon H, Streusand W et al. (2012) Sensory integration therapy for autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 6 (3): 1004–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laulan J, Fouquet B, Rodaix C, Jauffret P, Roquelaure Y, Descatha A (2011) Thoracic outlet syndrome: definition, aetiological factors, diagnosis, management and occupational impact. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 21 (3): 366–373

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA et al. (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 6 (4): W

    Google Scholar 

  • Mühlhauser I, Lenz M, Meyer G (2011) Development, appraisal and synthesis of complex interventions – a methodological challenge. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 105 (10): 751–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noblit GW, Hare RD (1988) Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K (2005) Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 10 Suppl 1: 21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritschl V (2015) Fall prevention through assistive devices among elderly persons – a systematic review. FH Campus Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM (2001) Using narrative literature reviews to build a scientific knowledge base. Work 16 (2): 165–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM, Merchant WR (2010) Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work 35 (3): 399–404. Retrieved from http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/20364059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saini M, Shlonsky A (2012) Systematic synthesis of qualitative research. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh D, Downe S (2005) Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research : a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 50 (2): 204–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittemore R, Knafl K (2005) The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing 52 (5): 546–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittmore R (2005) Combining evidence in nursing research: methods and implications. Nursing Research 54 (1): 56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R (2013) RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. BMC Medicine 11 (1): 20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C-H, Mathiowetz V (2014a) Systematic review of occupational therapy – related interventions for people with multiple sclerosis. Part 1: Activity and participation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 68 (1): 27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C-H, Mathiowetz V (2014b) Systematic review of occupational therapy-related interventions for people with multiple sclerosis. Part 2: Impairment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 68 (1): 33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zänger H, Ritschl V (2014) Analyse der Reliabilität und Anwendung von Goniometern zur Erstellung von Anwendungsempfehlungen für die ergotherapeutische Praxis – ein systematischer Review. Ergoscience 9 (1): 12–23

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medizinische Universität Wien Christian Doppler Labor zur Wiederherstellung von Extremitätenfunktion, Spitalgasse 23, A-1090, Wien, Österreich

    Agnes Sturma

  2. Medizinische Universität Wien Institut für Outcomes Research Zentrum für Medizinische Statistik, Informatik und Intelligente Systeme, Spitalgasse 23, A-1090, Wien, Österreich

    Valentin Ritschl

  3. Alice Salomon Hochschule Berlin, Alice-Salomon-Platz 5, D-12627, Berlin, Germany

    Silke Dennhardt

  4. Medizinische Universität Wien Christian Doppler Labor zur Wiederherstellung von Extremitätenfunktion, Spitalgasse 23, A-1090, Wien, Österreich

    Tanja Stamm

Authors
  1. Agnes Sturma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Valentin Ritschl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Silke Dennhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tanja Stamm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Medizinische Universität Wien, Institut für Outcomes Research, Wien, Österreich

    Valentin Ritschl

  2. Klinische Abteilung für Kinder- und Jugendheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, St. Pölten, Österreich

    Roman Weigl

  3. Medizinische Universität Wien, Institut für Outcomes Research, Wien, Österreich

    Tanja Stamm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sturma, A., Ritschl, V., Dennhardt, S., Stamm, T. (2016). Reviews. In: Ritschl, V., Weigl, R., Stamm, T. (eds) Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten und Schreiben. Studium Pflege, Therapie, Gesundheit . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49908-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49908-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49907-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49908-5

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation