Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interspezifische Konkurrenz

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ökologie

  • 25k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Nachdem wir in den vorangegangenen Kapiteln den Begriff der intraspezifischen Konkurrenz eingeführt haben, kann man sich leicht vorstellen, was mit interspezifischer Konkurrenz (zwischenartlicher Konkurrenz; engl. interspecific competition) gemeint ist: Infolge der Ausnutzung von Ressourcen oder der Interferenz durch eine andere Art leiden die Individuen einer Spezies unter verringerter Fruchtbarkeit, geringerer Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit oder eingeschränktem Wachstum. Diese individuellen Einflüsse wirken sich mit ziemlicher Wahrscheinlichkeit auf die Populationsdynamik und die Verbreitung der konkurrierenden Arten aus. Diese wiederum beeinflussen die Zusammensetzung der Lebensgemeinschaften, denen sie angehören. Aber diese individuellen Effekte wirken auch auf die Evolution dieser Arten, die selbst wieder die Verbreitung und Populationsdynamik der Spezies beeinflussen kann.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Alle Rechte bei © Contra Costa Times, Walnut Creek, Kalifornien, Weiterveröffentlichung nur mit Genehmigung gestattet.

Bibliographie

  • Passarge, J., Hol, S., Escher, M. & Huisman, J. (2006) Competition for nutrients and light: stable coexistence, alternative stable states, or competitive exclusion? Ecological Monographs, 76, 57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petren, K. & Case, T.J. (1996) An experimental demonstration of exploitation competition in an ongoing invasion. Ecology, 77, 118–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi, Y. & Nakano, S. (2000) Condition-specific competition: implications for the altitudinal distribution of stream fishes. Ecology, 81, 2027–2039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Interlandi, S.J. & Kilham, S.S. (2001) Limiting resources and the regulation of diversity in phytoplankton communities. Ecology, 82, 1270–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J-L. & Thibault, J-C. (1996) Coexistence in Mediterranean warblers: ecological differences or interspecific territoriality? Journal of Biogeography, 13, 169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P.R. & Martin, T.E. (2001) Ecological and fitness consequences of species coexistence: a removal experiment with wood warblers. Ecology, 82, 189–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, M.E. & Taylor, P.R (1985) Competition between herbivorous fishes and urchins on Caribbean reefs. Oecologia, 65, 591–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, P.J., Lawler, S.P. & Johnson, E.A (1988) Competition between aquatic insects and vertebrates: interaction strength and higher order interactions. Ecology, 69, 1401–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsland, S.E. (1985) Modeling Nature. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Volterra, V. (1926) Variations and fluctuations of the numbers of individuals in animal species living together. (Reprinted in 1931. In: Animal Ecology (R.N. Chapman, ed.), pp. 409–448. McGraw Hill, New York.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A.J. (1932) The growth of mixed population: two species competing for a common food supply. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 22, 461–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T.M., Young, T.P., Stanton, M.L. & Wenk, E. (2000) Short term dynamics of an acacia ant community in Laikipia, Kenya. Oecologia, 123, 425–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, M.L., Palmer, T.M. & Young, T.P. (2002) Competition-colonization trade-offs in a guild of African acacia ants. Ecological Monographs, 72, 347–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, P. & Prati, D. (2001) Intraspecific aggregation alters competitive interactions in experimental plant communities. Ecology, 82, 319–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D.S., Dayan T., Jones, C. & Ogura, G. (2000) Character displacement and release in the small Indian mongoose, Herpestes javanicus. Ecology, 91, 2086–2099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S.M. & Robinson, B.W. (2001) Experimental evidence that competition between stickleback species favours adaptive character divergence. Ecology Letters, 5, 264–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, P.B. & Trevisano, M. (1998) Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature, 394, 69–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buckling, A., McLean, R.C., Brockhurst, M.A & Colgrave, N. (2009) The Beagle in a bottle. Nature, 457, 824–829

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • terHorst, C.P. (2011) Experimental evolution of protozoan traits in response to interspecific competition. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24, 36–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J.K. & Mariscal, R.N. (2001) Coexistence of nine anemonefish species: differential host and habitat utilization, size and recruitment. Marine Biology, 138, 23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S.J., Palmiotto, P.A., Ashton, P.S., Lee, H.S. & Lafrankie, J.V. (1998) Comparative ecology of 11 sympatric species of Macaranga in Borneo: tree distribution in relation to horizontal and vertical resource heterogeneity. Journal of Ecology, 86, 662–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickie, I.A., Xu, B. & Koide, R.T. (2002) Vertical niche differentiation of ectomycorrhizal hyphae in soil as shown by T-RFLP analysis. New Phytologist, 156, 527–535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, L.E. & Eisenberg, R.M. (1990) Experimentally synchronized phenology and interspecific competition in mantids. American Midland Naturalist, 124, 390–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKane, R.B., Johnson, L.C., Shaver, G.R. et al. (2002) Resource-based niches provide a basis for plant species diversity and dominance in arctic tundra. Nature, 415, 68–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch, J., Morrow, L.L., Wallace, A. & Walsh, J.S. (1992) A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. American Naturalist, 140, 539–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor, L.R. (1980) Structure and stability in natural and randomly constructed competitive communities. American Naturalist, 116, 394–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermoyian, C.S., Leighton, L.R. & Kaplan, P. (2002) Testing the role of competition in fossil communities using limiting similarity. Geology, 30, 15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coomes, D.A., Rees, M., Turnbull, L. & Ratcliffe, S. (2002) On the mechanisms of coexistence among annual-plant species, using neighbourhood techniques and simulation models. Plant Ecology, 163, 23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, I. & Denno, R.F. (2007) Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects revisited: a quantitative assessment of competition theory. Ecology Letters, 10, 977–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli, N.J. & McCabe, D.J. (2002) Species co-occurrence: a meta-analysis of J.M. Diamond’s assembly rules model. Ecology, 83, 2091–2096

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Großbritannien

    Michael Begon

  2. Department of Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA

    Robert W. Howarth

  3. Dept. of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, Neuseeland

    Colin R. Townsend

Authors
  1. Michael Begon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert W. Howarth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Colin R. Townsend
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Begon, M., Howarth, R.W., Townsend, C.R. (2017). Interspezifische Konkurrenz. In: Ökologie. Springer Spektrum, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49906-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation