DLC: Compiling a Concurrent System Formal Specification to a Distributed Implementation

  • Hugues EvrardEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9636)


Formal methods can verify the correctness of a concurrent system by analyzing its model. However, if the actual implementation is written by hand, subtle and hard to detect bugs may be unintentionally introduced, thus ruining the verification effort. In this paper, we present DLC (Distributed LNT Compiler), a tool that automatically generates distributed implementation of concurrent systems modeled in the LNT language, which can be formally verified using the CADP toolbox.


Configuration File Parallel Composition Process Algebra Concurrent System Sequential Implementation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The author warmly thanks Frédéric Lang for reviews of this paper, and all other members of the CONVECS team for their support.


  1. 1.
    Carbone, M., Montesi, F.: Deadlock-freedom-by-design: multiparty asynchronous global programming. In: POPL 2013, pp. 263–274. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castro, D., Gulías, V.M., Earle, C.B., Fredlund, L., Rivas, S.: A case study on verifying a supervisor component using McErlang. ENTCS 271, 23–40 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Champelovier, D., Clerc, X., Garavel, H., Guerte, Y., McKinty, C., Powazny, V., Lang, F., Serwe, W., Smeding, G.: Reference Manual of the LNT to LOTOS Translator (Version 6.1). INRIA/VASY and INRIA/CONVECS, August 2014Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Evrard, H.: Génération automatique d’implémentation distribuée à partir de modéles formels de processus concurrents asynchrones. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Grenoble, July 2015Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evrard, H., Lang, F.: Formal verification of distributed branching multiway synchronization protocols. In: Beyer, D., Boreale, M. (eds.) FMOODS/FORTE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7892, pp. 146–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Evrard, H., Lang, F.: Automatic distributed code generation from formal models of asynchronous concurrent processes. In: PDP 2015. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garavel, H., Lang, F., Mateescu, R., Serwe, W.: CADP 2011: a toolbox for the construction and analysis of distributed processes. STTT 15(2), 89–107 (2013). SpringerCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garavel, H., Sighireanu, M.: A graphical parallel composition operator for process algebras. In: Wu, J., Chanson, S.T., Gao, Q. (eds.) FORTE/PSTV 1999. IFIP AICT, vol. 28, pp. 185–202. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garavel, H., Viho, C., Zendri, M.: System design of a CC-NUMA multiprocessor architecture using formal specification, model-checking, co-simulation, and test generation. STTT 3(3), 314–331 (2001). SpringerzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Proenca, J., Clarke, D., Vink, E., Arbab, F.: Dreams: a framework for distributed synchronous coordination. In: SAC. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quilbeuf, J.: Distributed implementations of component-based systems with prioritized multiparty interactions. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Grenoble (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Team CONVECS – Inria Grenoble Rhône-Alpes and LIGMontbonnotFrance

Personalised recommendations