Advertisement

Globalization pp 363-395 | Cite as

Which Conflicts Can the European Neighbourhood Policy Help Resolve?

  • Thorvaldur Gylfason
  • Per Magnus Wijkman
Chapter

Abstract

Under what conditions can the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) achieve one of the objectives of the European Union (EU): to resolve conflicts in its neighbourhood? In the spirit of Montesquieu and Monnet, the basic hypothesis of the EU is that closer economic integration helps resolve political conflicts and vice versa, creating a virtuous circle of prosperity and detente. The EU has a strong self-interest in resolving conflicts in its neighbourhood since their consequences spill over into the EU itself through refugee flows and trans-border criminal activities. The paper identifies factors important for the neighbourhood countries to succeed: access to active facilitators of compromise, a well-functioning market economy, strong common institutions to realise potential intra-regional free trade, the prospect of accession to the EU and the absence of third parties to the conflicts. However, characteristic of the key conflicts in the European Neighbourhood is that few of the parties are prospective members of the EU and that a third party outside the Partnership is involved in major conflicts. To succeed in conflict resolution, the EU must, therefore, provide these parties significantly stronger arbitration, more technical and financial resources and stronger institutions anchoring the partner country to the EU. This applies to conflicts involving partners in the Eastern Partnership as well as in the Mediterranean Partnership.

Keywords

European Union Free Trade Free Trade Agreement Partner Country Balkan Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. COM (2011) 202, European Commission & High representative of the European Union for foreign affairs and security policy, Brussels 25/05/2011, A new response to a changing neighbourhood; A review of European neighbourhood policy.Google Scholar
  2. Gogolashvili, K. (2011). The conflicts in the South Caucasus and their impact on the eastern partnership. Eastern Partnership Review No. 9.Google Scholar
  3. Gylfason, T., Martínez-Zarzoso, I., & Wijkman, P.M. (2012, July). How free trade can help convert the ‘Arab Spring’ into permanent peace and democracy. CESifo Working Paper No. 3882.Google Scholar
  4. Gylfason, T., Martínez-Zarzoso, I., & Wijkman, P. M. (2014, June 14). A way out of the Ukrainian quagmire. VoxEU.Google Scholar
  5. Gylfason, T., & Wijkman, P. M. (2011a, January 1). Economic integration as a Balkan peace project. VoxEU.Google Scholar
  6. Gylfason, T., & Wijkman, P. M. (2011b, January 3). Dayton’s unfinished business. VoxEU.Google Scholar
  7. Gylfason, T., & Wijkman, P. M. (2014, January 25). Meeting Russia’s challenge to EU’s eastern partnership. VoxEU.Google Scholar
  8. Kaminski, B., & de la Rocha, M. (2002), Policy induced integration in Balkans: Policy options and their assessment. In Trade policies and institutions in the countries of South Eastern Europe in the EU association and stabilization process. World Bank.Google Scholar
  9. Kowalczyk, C. (2000). Welfare and integration. International Economic Review, 41(2), 483–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kowalczyk, C., & Davis, D. (1998). Tariff phase-outs: Theory and evidence from GATT and NAFTA. In J. Frankel (Ed.), The regionalisation of the world economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Messerlin, P., Emerson, M., Jandieri, G., & Le Vernoy, A. (2011), An appraisal of the EU’s trade policy towards its eastern neighbours; The case of Georgia. Group d’Economie Mondiale, Science Po, Paris, and Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.Google Scholar
  12. Monnet, J. (1976), Mémoires, Librairie Arthème Fayard.Google Scholar
  13. Montesquieu. (1748), C.-L. de S., On the spirit of the laws (De l’esprit des lois), Book XX.Google Scholar
  14. Sekarev, A. (2011).Medium-term trade flows between EU27 and EaP6: What trends are visible? Eastern Partnership Review No. 10.Google Scholar
  15. Wijkman, P. M. (2011), Fostering deep and comprehensive free trade agreements for the eastern partners. Eastern Partnership Review No. 8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of IcelandReykjavíkIceland
  2. 2.School of Commercial Law and EconomicsUniversity of GöteborgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations