This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Zook 2016, When large companies are better at Entrepreneurship than Startups, HBR, https://hbr.org/2016/12/when-large-companies-are-better-at-entrepreneurship-than-startups.
- 2.
For some companies or situations, ignoring a disruption or a complete transformation may be gainful. However, this will not be discussed here further [2].
- 3.
Sauberschwarz & Weiss, 2017: Das Comeback der Konzerne, Vahlen Verlag.
- 4.
Sauberschwarz & Weiss, 2017: Das Comeback der Konzerne, Vahlen Verlag.
- 5.
Even when a promising new technology is already identified, goals and criteria need to be defined before any ideation and development starts.
References
G. Cosier und P. Hughes, The problem with disruption, 4 Hrsg., Bd. 19, BT Technology Journal, 2001, p. 9 ff.
“Huffingtonpost,” [Online]. Available: http://www.huffingtonpost.de/adam-tinworth/disruption-ist-der-neue-n_b_4671895.html. [Accessed 07 08 2016].
J. Bower und C. Christensen, Disruptive technologies: catching the wave, Harvard Business Review, 1995.
KPMG, “2016 Globald CEO Outlook,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://home.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/06/2016-global-ceo-outlook.pdf. [Accessed 15 08 2016].
Reis, The lean startup, New York: Crown Business, 2011.
N.D., Disruptive innovation in mature industries, INSEAD Articles, 2015.
C. Christensen, What is disruptive innovation?, Harvard Business Review, 2015, pp. 44–53.
The Guardian, “Why its time to retire ‘disruption’,” 11 01 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jan/11/disruption-silicon-valleys-buzzword. [Accessed 15 08 2016].
C. Christensen, The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail, Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
C. Christensen, The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth, Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
Markides, Disruptive innovation, In need of a better theory, 1 Hrsg., Bd. 23, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2006, pp. 19–25.
Y. Dan und C. Hang, “A reflexive review of disruptive innovation theory,” Journal of Management Reviews, Bd. 4, pp. 435–452, 2010.
C. Markides, Business Model Innovation: What can the ambidexterity literature teach us?, 4 Hrsg., Bd. 27, The Academy of Management Perspectives, 2013, pp. 313–323.
G. Berglund, M. Magnusson und C. Sandström, Symmetric assumptions in the theory of disruptive innovation, 4 Hrsg., Bd. 23, Creativity and Innovation Management, 2014, pp. 472–483.
M. Assink, “Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: A conceptual model,” European Journal of Innovation Management, Bd. 2, pp. 215–233.
J. Paap und R. Katz, Anticipating disruptive innovation, 5 Hrsg., Bd. 47, Research-Technology Management, 2004, pp. 13–22.
C. Charitou und C. Markides, Responses to disruptive stategic innovation, 2 Hrsg., Bd. 44, Massachusetts: MIT Sloan Management Review, 2002, pp. 55–64.
J. Gans, Keep calm and manage disruption, 3 Hrsg., Bd. 53, MIT Sloan management Review, 2016, p. 83 ff.
“The Atlantic,” 10 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/10/the-disruption-myth/379348/. [Accessed 08 08 2016].
“Handelsblatt, the electric Audi challenge,” [Online]. Available: https://global.handelsblatt.com/edition/378/ressort/companies-markets/article/audi-gets-digital. [Accessed 16 08 2016].
S. Anthony, “Kodak’s downfall wasn’t about technology,” 07 2016. [Online]. Available: https://hbr.org/2016/07/kodaks-downfall-wasnt-about-technology. [Accessed 15 08 2016].
M. Iansiti, F. McFarlan und G. Westerman, Leveraging the incumbent’s advantage, 4 Hrsg., Bd. 44, MIT Sloan Management Review, 2003, pp. 58–65.
T. Kohler, Corporate Accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups, 3 Hrsg., Bd. 59, Business Horizons, 2016, pp. 347–357.
King und B. Baatartogtokh, How useful is the theory of disruptive innovation?, 1 Hrsg., Bd. 57, MIT Sloan Management Review, 2015, p. 77.
N-TV, “Dickes Absatzplus: Neuer Smart schiebt Daimler an,” [Online]. Available: http://www.n-tv.de/wirtschaft/Neuer-Smart-schiebt-Daimler-an-article14466976.html. [Accessed 18 08 2016].
Wall Street Journal, “Can big companies be truly innovative?,” 17 08 2012. [Online]. Available: http://blogs.wsj.com/atwork/2012/08/17/can-big-companies-be-truly-innovative. [Accessed 08 08 2016].
“Future Matters,” [Online]. Available: http://future-matters.com/innovation-und-zukunftsforschung/. [Accessed 18 08 2016].
Further Reading
Ignatius, The disruption conversation, Harvard Business Review, 2015, p. 14.
J. Gans, The other disruption, 3 Hrsg., Bd. 94, Harvard Business Review, 2016, p. 17 ff.
Markides, Business Model Innovation: What can the ambidexterity literature teach us?, 4 Hrsg., Bd. 27, The Academy of Management Perspectives, 2013, pp. 313–323.
Disruptive innovation – but is it?, 6 Hrsg., Bd. 25, Strategic Direction.
The New Yorker, “The disruption machine,” 23 06 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/06/23/the-disruption-machine. [Zugriff am 08 08 2016].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sauberschwarz, L., Weiss, L. (2018). How Corporations Can Win the Race Against Disruptive Startups. In: Linnhoff-Popien, C., Schneider, R., Zaddach, M. (eds) Digital Marketplaces Unleashed. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49275-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49275-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49274-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49275-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)