Zusammenfassung
In den Teil Sonografie dieser Auflage des BI-RADS®-Atlas wurden zahlreiche substantielle Veränderungen eingebracht, um den klinischen Nutzen zu verbessern und eine einheitliche Basis zur Forschung auf dem Gebiet der Brust-Bildgebung zu liefern. Dieses Kapitel nimmt Bezug auf diese Veränderungen, die in jedem Abschnitt des BI-RADS®-Atlas vorkommen, und liefert vollständigere Erklärungen zu diesen Veränderungen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Bosch AM, Kessels AG, Beets GL et al. Interexamination variation of whole breast US. Br J. Radiol 2003;76:328–331.
21 CFR Part 16 and 900: Mammography Quality Standards; Final Rule. Federal Register, Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 62: No. 208; 55851–55994, October 28, 1997.
Berg WA, Sechtin AG, Marques H, Zhang Z. Cystic breast lesions and the ACRIN 6666 experience. Radiol Clin North Am 2010; 48:931–987.
Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Madsen EL. Lesion detection and characterization in a breast US phantom; results of the ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Radiology 2006;239:692–702.
Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB. Operator-dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology 2006;241:355–365.
Mendelson EB. Evaluation of the postoperative breast. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:107–138.
Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,194 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991; 179:463–468.
Sickles EA. Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. Radiology 1994;192:439–442.
Varas X, Leborgne F, Mezzera J, Jaumandru S. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. AJR 2002; 179: 691–695.
Vizcaino I, Gadea L, Andreo L, et al. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 2001; 219: 475–483.
Barr RG, Zhang Z, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Berg WA. Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: relevance and risk of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 Trial. Radiology 2013, in press. Epub Aug 20, 2013.
Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Graf C, Sickles EA. Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to Biopsy? Radiology 2007; 244:87–93.
Harvey JA, Nicholson BT, Larusso AP, Cohen MA, Bovbjerg VE. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women. AJR 2009;193:1723–1730.
Gordon PB, Gagnon FA, Lanzkowsky L. Solid breast masses diagnosed as fibroadenoma at fine-needle aspiration biopsy: acceptable rates of growth at long-term follow-up. Radiology 2003;229:233–238.
Leung JW, Sickles EA. Multiple bilateral masses detected on screening mammography: assessment of need for recall imaging. AJR 2000; 175:23–29.
Berg WA, Campassi C, Ioffe O. Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 2003;227:183–191.
Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Dunser M. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000;21:325–336.
Chang YW, KWON KH, Goo DE, Chio DL, Lee HK, Yang SB. Sonographic differentiation of benign and malignant cystic lesions of the breast. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:47–53.
Daly CP, Bailey JE, Klein KA, Helvie MA. Complicated breast cysts on sonography: is aspiration necessary to exclude malignancy? Acad Radiol 2008; 15:610–617.
Venta LA, KIM JP, Pelloski CE, Morrow M. Management of complex breast cysts. AJR 1999;173:1331–1336.
Berg WA. Sonographically depicted breast clustered microcysts: is follow-up appropriate? AJR 2005; 185:952–959.
Warner JK, Kumar D, Berg WA. Apocrine metaplastic mammographic and sonographic appearances. AJR 1998;170:1375–1379.
Slanetz PJ, Giardino AA, McCarthy KA, et al. Previous breast biopsy for benign disease rarely complicates or alters interpretation on screening mammography. AJR 1998;170:1539–1541.
Kim WH, Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, Yi A, Koo HR, et al. Intraductal mass on breast ultrasound: final outcomes and predictors of malignancy. AJR 2013;200:932–937.
Sickles EA. Findings at mammographic screening on only one standard projection: outcomes analysis. Radiology 1998; 208: 471–475.
American College of Radiology Imaging Network. Protocol 6666, screening breast ultrasound in high-risk women. (http://www.acrin.org/TablD/153/Default.aspx). Accessed November 4, 2013.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mendelson, E. et al. (2016). Hilfestellung. In: ACR BI-RADS®-Atlas der Mammadiagnostik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48818-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48818-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48817-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48818-8
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)