High Performance Multi-GPU SpMV for Multi-component PDE-Based Applications

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9233)


Leveraging optimization techniques (e.g., register blocking and double buffering) introduced in the context of KBLAS, a Level 2 BLAS high performance library on GPUs, the authors implement dense matrix-vector multiplications within a sparse-block structure. While these optimizations are important for high performance dense kernel executions, they are even more critical when dealing with sparse linear algebra operations. The most time-consuming phase of many multicomponent applications, such as models of reacting flows or petroleum reservoirs, is the solution at each implicit time step of large, sparse spatially structured or unstructured linear systems. The standard method is a preconditioned Krylov solver. The Sparse Matrix-Vector multiplication (SpMV) is, in turn, one of the most time-consuming operations in such solvers. Because there is no data reuse of the elements of the matrix within a single SpMV, kernel performance is limited by the speed at which data can be transferred from memory to registers, making the bus bandwidth the major bottleneck. On the other hand, in case of a multi-species model, the resulting Jacobian has a dense block structure. For contemporary petroleum reservoir simulations, the block size typically ranges from three to a few dozen among different models, and still larger blocks are relevant within adaptively model-refined regions of the domain, though generally the size of the blocks, related to the number of conserved species, is constant over large regions within a given model. This structure can be exploited beyond the convenience of a block compressed row data format, because it offers opportunities to hide the data motion with useful computations. The new SpMV kernel outperforms existing state-of-the-art implementations on single and multi-GPUs using matrices with dense block structure representative of porous media applications with both structured and unstructured multi-component grids.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Abdelfattah, A., Keyes, D., Ltaief, H.: KBLAS: an optimized library for dense matrix-vector multiplication on GPU accelerators. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. (accepted subject to revision) (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1726
  3. 3.
    Antz, H., Tomov, S., Dongarra, J.: Implementing a Sparse Matrix Vector Product for the SELL-C/SELL-C-\(\sigma \) formats on NVIDIA GPUs. Technical report (2014). http://www.icl.utk.edu/sites/icl/files/publications/2014/icl-utk-772-2014.pdf
  4. 4.
    Ashari, A., Sedaghati, N., Eisenlohr, J., Parthasarathy, S., Sadayappan, P.: Fast sparse matrix-vector multiplication on GPUs for graph applications. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC 2014, pp. 781–792 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SC.2014.69
  5. 5.
    Balay, S., Abhyankar, S., Adams, M.F., Brown, J., Brune, P., Buschelman, K., Eijkhout, V., Gropp, W.D., Kaushik, D., Knepley, M.G., McInnes, L.C., Rupp, K., Smith, B.F., Zhang, H.: PETSc Web page (2014). http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc
  6. 6.
    Bell, N., Garland, M.: CUSP: Generic Parallel Algorithms for Sparse Matrix and Graph Computations. http://cusplibrary.github.io/
  7. 7.
    Bell, N., Garland, M.: Implementing sparse matrix-vector multiplication on throughput-oriented processors. In: Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC 2009, pp. 18:1–18:11. ACM, New York (2009). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1654059.1654078
  8. 8.
    Chen, Z., Huan, G., Ma, Y.: Computational Methods for Multiphase Flows in Porous Media. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi, J.W., Singh, A., Vuduc, R.W.: Model-driven autotuning of sparse matrix-vector multiply on GPUs. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, PPoPP 2010, pp. 115–126. ACM, New York (2010). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1693453.1693471
  10. 10.
    Godwin, J., Holewinski, J., Sadayappan, P.: High-performance sparse matrix-vector multiplication on GPUs for structured grid computations. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Workshop on General Purpose Processing with Graphics Processing Units, GPGPU-5, pp. 47–56. ACM, New York (2012). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2159430.2159436
  11. 11.
    Im, E.-J., Yelick, K.A.: Optimizing sparse matrix computations for register reuse in SPARSITY. In: Alexandrov, V.N., Dongarra, J., Juliano, B.A., Renner, R.S., Tan, C.J.K. (eds.) ICCS-ComputSci 2001. LNCS, vol. 2073, pp. 127–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45545-0_22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Im, E.J., Yelick, K., Vuduc, R.: Sparsity: optimization framework for sparse matrix kernels. Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl. 18(1), 135–158 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094342004041296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keyes, D.E., McInnes, L.C., Woodward, C., Gropp, W.D., Myra, E., Pernice, M., Bell, J., Brown, J., Clo, A., Connors, J., Constantinescu, E., Estep, D., Evans, K., Farhat, C., Hakim, A., Hammond, G., Hansen, G., Hill, J., Isaac, T., Jiao, X., Jordan, K., Kaushik, D., Kaxiras, E., Koniges, A., Lee, K., Lott, A., Lu, Q., Magerlein, J., Maxwell, R., McCourt, M., Mehl, M., Pawlowski, R., Peters, A., Reynolds, D., Riviere, B., Rüde, U., Scheibe, T., Shadid, J., Sheehan, B., Shephard, M., Siegel, A., Smith, B., Tang, X., Wilson, C., Wohlmuth, B.: Multiphysics simulations: challenges and opportunities. Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl. 27, 4–83 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kincaid, D., Oppe, T., Young, D.: ITPACKV 2D User’s Guide (1989). http://www.ma.utexas.edu/CNA/ITPACK/manuals/userv2d/
  15. 15.
    Kreutzer, M., Hager, G., Wellein, G., Fehske, H., Bishop, A.: A unified sparse matrix data format for efficient general sparse matrix-vector multiplication on modern processors with wide SIMD units. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 36(5), C401–C423 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/130930352 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kreutzer, M., Hager, G., Wellein, G., Fehske, H., Basermann, A., Bishop, A.R.: Sparse matrix-vector multiplication on GPGPU clusters: a new storage format and a scalable implementation. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 26th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops, IPDPSW 2012, pp. 1696–1702. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW.2012.211
  17. 17.
    Minden, V., Smith, B., Knepley, M.: Preliminary implementation of petsc using gpus. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Workshop of GPU Solutions to Multiscale Problems in Science and Engineering (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Monakov, A., Lokhmotov, A., Avetisyan, A.: Automatically tuning sparse matrix-vector multiplication for GPU architectures. In: Patt, Y.N., Foglia, P., Duesterwald, E., Faraboschi, P., Martorell, X. (eds.) HiPEAC 2010. LNCS, vol. 5952, pp. 111–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11515-8_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saad, Y., Schultz, M.: GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 7(3), 856–869 (1986). http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0907058 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vázquez, F., Fernández, J.J., Garzón, E.M.: A new approach for sparse matrix vector product on NVIDIA GPUs. Concurrency Comput. Pract. Experience 23(8), 815–826 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpe.1658 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Williams, F.A.: Combustion Theory. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park (1985) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Computer, Electrical, and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering, Extreme Computing Research CenterKing Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyJeddahKSA

Personalised recommendations