Metastability of Asymptotically Well-Behaved Potential Games

(Extended Abstract)
  • Diodato Ferraioli
  • Carmine Ventre
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9235)


One of the main criticisms to game theory concerns the assumption of full rationality. Logit dynamics is a decentralized algorithm in which a level of irrationality (a.k.a. “noise”) is introduced in players’ behavior. In this context, the solution concept of interest becomes the logit equilibrium, as opposed to Nash equilibria. Logit equilibria are distributions over strategy profiles that possess several nice properties, including existence and uniqueness. However, there are games in which their computation may take exponential time. We therefore look at an approximate version of logit equilibria, called metastable distributions, introduced by Auletta et al. [4]. These are distributions which remain stable (i.e., players do not go too far from it) for a large number of steps (rather than forever, as for logit equilibria). The hope is that these distributions exist and can be reached quickly by logit dynamics.

We identify a class of potential games, that we name asymptotically well-behaved, for which the behavior of the logit dynamics is not chaotic as the number of players increases, so to guarantee meaningful asymptotic results. We prove that any such game admits distributions which are metastable no matter the level of noise present in the system, and the starting profile of the dynamics. These distributions can be quickly reached if the rationality level is not too big when compared to the inverse of the maximum difference in potential. Our proofs build on results which may be of independent interest, including some spectral characterizations of the transition matrix defined by logit dynamics for generic games and the relationship among convergence measures for Markov chains.


Markov Chain Nash Equilibrium Stationary Distribution Strategy Profile Coordination Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work is supported by PRIN 2010-2011 project ARS TechnoMedia and EPSRC grant EP/M018113/1. Authors wish to thank Paul W. Goldberg for many invaluable discussions related to a number of results discussed in this paper, and an anonymous reviewer for the enlightening comments on an earlier version of this work.


  1. 1.
    Alós-Ferrer, C., Netzer, N.: The logit-response dynamics. Games Econ. Behav. 68(2), 413–427 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Auletta, V., Ferraioli, D., Pasquale, F., Penna, P., Persiano, G.: Convergence to equilibrium of logit dynamics for strategic games. In: SPAA, pp. 197–206 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Auletta, V., Ferraioli, D., Pasquale, F., Persiano, G.: Mixing time and stationary expected social welfare of logit dynamics. In: Kontogiannis, S., Koutsoupias, E., Spirakis, P.G. (eds.) SAGT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6386, pp. 54–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Auletta, V., Ferraioli, D., Pasquale, F., Persiano, G.: Metastability of logit dynamics for coordination games. In: SODA, pp. 1006–1024 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blume, L.E.: The statistical mechanics of strategic interaction. Games Econ. Behav. 5, 387–424 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ding, J., Lubetzky, E., Peres, Y.: Censored glauber dynamics for the mean field ising model. Stat. Phys. 137(3), 407–458 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ding, J., Lubetzky, E., Peres, Y.: The mixing time evolution of glauber dynamics for the mean-field ising model. Commun. Math. Phys. 289(2), 725–764 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ellison, G.: Learning, local interaction, and coordination. Econometrica 61(5), 1047–1071 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fabrikant, A., Papadimitriou, C.H., Talwar, K.: The complexity of pure nash equilibria. In: STOC, pp. 604–612 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferraioli, D., Goldberg, P.W., Ventre, C.: Decentralized dynamics for finite opinion games. In: Serna, M. (ed.) SAGT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7615, pp. 144–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferraioli, D., Ventre, C.: Metastability of potential games. CoRR, abs/1211.2696 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hollander, F.: Metastability under stochastic dynamics. Stoch. Process. Appl. 114(1), 1–26 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levin, D., Luczak, M., Peres, Y.: Glauber dynamics for the mean-field ising model: cut-off, critical power law, and metastability. Probab. Theor. Relat. Fields 146, 223–265 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levin, D., Yuval, P., Wilmer, E.L.: Markov Chains and Mixing Times. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lipton, R.J., Markakis, E., Mehta, A.: Playing large games using simple strategies. In: ACM EC, pp. 36–41 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McKelvey, R.D., Palfrey, T.R.: Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games Econ. Behav. 10(1), 6–38 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Monderer, D., Shapley, L.S.: Potential games. Games Econ. Behav. 14(1), 124–143 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Montanari, A., Saberi, A.: Convergence to equilibrium in local interaction games. In: FOCS (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Young, H.P.: The economy as a complex evolving system. In: The Diffusion of Innovations in Social Networks, vol. III (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schiller, R.J.: Irrational Exuberance. Wiley, New York (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità di SalernoSalernoItaly
  2. 2.School of ComputingTeesside UniversityMiddlesbroughUK

Personalised recommendations