Cryptographic Currencies from a Tech-Policy Perspective: Policy Issues and Technical Directions

  • Emily McReynolds
  • Adam Lerner
  • Will Scott
  • Franziska Roesner
  • Tadayoshi Kohno
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8976)


We study legal and policy issues surrounding crypto currencies, such as Bitcoin, and how those issues interact with technical design options. With an interdisciplinary team, we consider in depth a variety of issues surrounding law, policy, and crypto currencies—such as the physical location where a crypto currency’s value exists for jurisdictional and other purposes, the regulation of anonymous or pseudonymous currencies, and challenges as virtual currency protocols and laws evolve. We reflect on how different technical directions may interact with the relevant laws and policies, raising key issues for both policy experts and technologists.


Money Laundering Silk Road Technical Mechanism Technical Direction Virtual Currency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank Jeff Haley, the members of the University of Washington Tech Policy Lab, and the members of the University of Washington Security and Privacy Research Lab for valuable discussions, and we thank our anonymous reviewers for feedback on an earlier version. This work was supported in part by NSF Award CNS-0846065, by the Short-Dooley Endowed Career Development Professorship, and by the University of Washington Tech Policy Lab.


  1. 1.
    U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S. Title 18, Section 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Securities and Exchange Commission vs. Trendon T. Shavers and Bitcoin Savings and Trust, July 2013.
  4. 4.
    Seizure Warrant for Mutum Sigillum, a subsidiary of Mt. Gox , May 2013.
  5. 5.
    United States vs. Ross William Ulbricht, October 2013.
  6. 6.
    United States vs. Robert M. Faeilla and Charlie Shrem, January 2014.
  7. 7.
    Bangkok Pundit: Has Bitcoin really been banned in Thailand?, July 2013.
  8. 8.
    Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Garman, C., Green, M., Miers, I., Tromer, E., Virza, M.: Zerocash: decentralized anonymous payments from Bitcoin. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brito, J., Castillo, A.: Bitcoin: a primer for policymakers. Mercatus Center, George Mason University, August 2013.
  10. 10.
    Bryans, D.: Bitcoin and money laundering: mining for an effective solution. Indiana Law J. 89(1), 441–472 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bureau of consumer protection. In Brief: The Financial Privacy Requirements of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, July 2002.
  12. 12.
    Chaum, D., Fiat, A., Naor, M.: Untraceable electronic cash. In: Goldwasser, S. (ed.) CRYPTO 1988. LNCS, vol. 403, pp. 319–327. Springer, Heidelberg (1990) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chaum, D.: Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In: Advances in Cryptology, CRYPTO 1982 (1982)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: risks to consumers posed by virtual currencies, August 2014.
  15. 15.
    CyberCrime Law: Cybercrime laws from around the world.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Dratel, J.L.: Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant Ross Ulbricht’s Pre-Trial Motions Challenging the Face of the Indictment, April 2014.
  18. 18.
    European Central Bank: Virtual Currency Schemes, October 2012.
  19. 19.
    Eyal, I., Sirer, E.G.: Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable. In: Financial Cryptography and Data Security (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fairfield, J.: Smart Contracts, Bitcoin Bots, and Consumer Protection. Washington & Lee University Law Review Online, September 2014.
  21. 21.
    Federal Election Commission: FEC Memorandum, May 2014.
  22. 22.
    Financial Crimes Enforcement Network: Guidance FIN-2013-G001: Application of FinCEN’s Regulations to Persons Administering, Exchanging, or Using Virtual Currencies, March 2013Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Greenberg, A.: Forrest denial of defense motion in silk road case, July 2014.
  24. 24.
    Gruwell, L.: Wikimedia foundation now accepts Bitcoin, July 2014.
  25. 25.
    Hill, K.: 21 Things I Learned About Bitcoin Living On It A Second Time, May 2014.
  26. 26.
    Internal Revenue Service.
  27. 27.
    Internal Revenue Service: Notice 2014–21, March 2014.
  28. 28.
    Internal Revenue Service: Tax Consequences of Virtual World Transactions, August 2014.
  29. 29.
    Marini, P., Marc, F.: La Regulation a L’epreuve de L’innovation: Les Pouvoirs Publics Face au Developpement des Monnaies Virtuelles. French Senate, July 2014.
  30. 30.
    Meiklejohn, S., Pomarole, M., Jordan, G., Levchenko, K., McCoy, D., Voelker, G.M., Savage, S.: A fistful of bitcoins: characterizing payments among men with no names. In: Internet Measurement Conference (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Miers, I., Garman, C., Green, M., Rubin, A.D.: Zerocoin: anonymous distributed e-cash from Bitcoin. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2013)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008).
  33. 33.
    New York State Department of Financial Services: BitLicense Framework: Title 23. Department of Financial Services Chapter I. Regulations of the Superintendent of Financial Services Part 200. Virtual Currencies, Jul 2014.
  34. 34. Bitcoin on (2014).
  35. 35.
    Shirriff, K.: Hidden surprises in the Bitcoin blockchain and how they are stored: Nelson Mandela, Wikileaks, photos, and Python software, February 2014.
  36. 36.
    Stockman, S.: Stockman plans to introduce the “virtual currency tax reform act”, April 2014.
  37. 37.
    Tavakoli, Y., Yohannan, D.: Personal Jurisdiction in Cyberspace: Where Does It Begin, and Where Does It End? Intellectual Property and Technology Law Journal, January 2011.,
  38. 38.
    The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Directorate Staff: Regulation of Bitcoin in Selected Jurisdictions, January 2014Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    The People’s Bank of China and Five Associated Ministries: Prevention of Risks Associated with Bitcoin, December 2013.
  40. 40.
  41. 41.
    U.S. Department of the Treasury: report of international transportation of currency and monetary instruments.
  42. 42.
    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission: investor alert: Bitcoin and other virtual currency-related investments, May 2014).

Copyright information

© International Financial Cryptography Association 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily McReynolds
    • 1
  • Adam Lerner
    • 1
  • Will Scott
    • 1
  • Franziska Roesner
    • 1
  • Tadayoshi Kohno
    • 1
  1. 1.Tech Policy Lab and Security and Privacy Research LabUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations