Skip to main content

From the Constitutional Treaty to the Lisbon Treaty: Is the European Union on the Way to Becoming a Federal State?

  • Chapter
German Domestic and Foreign Policy
  • 559 Accesses

Abstract

After long, difficult negotiations, the heads of state and government of the then 25 member states of the European Union and of three accession candidates signed the agreement on a constitution for Europe on 29 October 2004. The agreement was designed to replace the treaties for the European Communities and European Union that had applied to date, and to lead to deeper integration among the European states. In referenda held in France and the Netherlands on 29 May and 1 June 2005, the constitutional treaty was rejected, however, even though it had already been ratified in many EU states, and was due to come into force on 1 November 2006.

A second, longer process of negotiations was required before some core elements of the constitutional treaty were able to be secured in the Treaty of Lisbon on 13 December 2007. This came into force on 1 December 2009, after ratification in all of the then 27 member states of the EU. Even after this, the EU remains an association of states for an indefinite period, i.e. a confederation with several federative elements which are reinforced by the Treaty of Lisbon. The nation states remain sovereign, and thus retain the right to exit from the EU and together to only ceded as many sovereign competencies to the EU organs as they wish. From 1 November 2004 onwards, the EU, in accordance with the Treaty of Nice, had already switched to majority decisions in the Council of Ministers in several political areas, since unilateral decisions had become ever more difficult to achieve in the Union following its significant expansion after 1 May 2004.

Despite the astonishing success of European integration during the past half-century, it should not be assumed that further progress will continue to be made of its own accord. The more political competencies are transferred to Brussels, the more probable it will be that difficult economic and social crises will lead to a strengthening of nationalisms that blame the EU for the consequences of the crisis and which will demand a return to single statehood. At the same time, however, a crisis could strengthen the demand for tighter federal state control, thus polarising the European political system. The fact should not be overlooked that far more integrated state entities than the EU have disintegrated after decades or even centuries. A continuation of the success story of European integration requires considerable economic and social assimilation of the nations, and at the same time, a securing of national-cultural independence among the peoples and states of Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, http://europa.eu/eu-law/decision-making/treaties/pdf/treaty_establishing_a_constitution_for_europe/treaty_establishing_a_constitution_for_europe_en.pdf (All websites retrieved on 18.1.2015).

  2. 2.

    Puntscher-Rickmann et al. (2006) and Klinger (2007).

  3. 3.

    Jopp and Matl (2005), Leiße (2009), Zuleeg et al. (2005), Höreth et al. (2005) and Ziller (2004).

  4. 4.

    Hierlemann (2008) and Gröner (2009).

  5. 5.

    Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:C:2007:306:FULL&from=DE

  6. 6.

    Treaty of Nice amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:080:TOC

  7. 7.

    Dosenrode (2007, p. 9).

  8. 8.

    Gimbal (2011).

  9. 9.

    Fischer, Joschka: Vom Staatenverbund zur Föderation—Gedanken über die Finalität der europäischen Integration, http://www.europa.clio-online.de/site/lang__de/ItemID__17/mid__11373/40208215/default.aspx

  10. 10.

    Gehler (2010), Foerster (1967) and Gollwitzer (1972).

  11. 11.

    See a brief summary in Jahn (2012, pp. 71–77).

  12. 12.

    Foerster (1967, pp. 296–310), Gehler (2010, pp. 121–135) and Judt (2009).

  13. 13.

    Loth (2014, pp. 41–56) and Pfetsch (2005, pp. 32–34).

  14. 14.

    Churchill (1946).

  15. 15.

    Mitrany (1975).

  16. 16.

    Bauer and Baumann (2008).

  17. 17.

    Norway, Switzerland, Iceland, Liechtenstein.

  18. 18.

    On the European draft constitutions in the twentieth century, see Federmann (2007).

  19. 19.

    Since 1 November 2014, her successor has been the former Italian foreign minister Federica Mogherini.

  20. 20.

    Haas (1958), Haas (1964), Bieling and Lerch (2012) and Jachtenfuchs and Kohler-Koch (2003).

References

  • Bauer T, Baumann F (2008) Politische Führung und Differenzierung in Europa. In: Weidenfeld W (ed) Lissabon in der Analyse. Der Reformvertrag der Europäischen Union. Nomos, Baden-Baden, p. 190

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieling H-J, Lerch M (2012) Theorien der europäischen Integration. VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill W (1946) United States of Europe. Speech at the university of Zurich. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/brussels/website/media/Basis/Geschichte/bis1950/Pdf/Churchill_Rede_Zuerich.pdf

  • Dosenrode S (ed) (2007) Approaching the European federation? Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Federmann F (2007) Der Konstitutionalisierung der Europäischen Union. Ãœberlegungen vor dem Hintergrund des andauernden europäischen Verfassungsprozesses. Eul, Lohmar, pp 221–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Foerster RH (1967) Europa. Geschichte einer politischen Idee. Mit einer Bibliographie von 181 Einigungsplänen aus den Jahren 1306–1945. Nymphenburger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehler M (2010) Europa. Ideen – Institutionen – Vereinigung. Olzog, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimbal A (2011) Unionsbürgerschaft. In: Weidenfeld W, Wessels W (eds) Europa von A bis Z. Taschenbuch der europäischen Integration. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp. 355–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer H (1972) Europabild und Europagedanke. Beck, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Gröner U (2009) Debating national referenda. In: Bruell C, Mokre M, Pausch M (eds) Democracy needs dispute. The debate on the European constitution. Campus, New York, pp. 69–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas EB (1958) The uniting of Europe, political, social and economic forces, 1950–1957. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas EB (1964) Beyond the nation-state. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hierlemann D (2008) Die Referenden: Ende der Verfassung, Anfang des Vertrags. In: Weidenfeld W (ed) Lissabon in der Analyse: Der Reformvertrag der Europäischen Union. Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp. 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Höreth M, Janowski C, Kühnhardt L (eds) (2005) Die europäische Verfassung. Analyse und Bewertung ihrer Strukturentscheidungen. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs M, Kohler-Koch B (eds) (2003) Europäische Integration. Leske + Budrich, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn E (2012) Frieden und Konflikt. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Jopp M, Matl S (eds) (2005) Der Vertrag über eine Verfassung für Europa. Analyse zur Konstitutionalisierung der EU. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Judt T (2009) Geschichte Europas von 1945 bis zur Gegenwart. Fischer, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger H (2007) Der Konvent. Ein neues Institut des europäischen Verfassungsrechts. Beck, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiße O (2009) Europa zwischen Nationalstaat und Integration. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Loth W (2014) Europas Einigung. Eine unvollendete Geschichte. Campus, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrany D (1975) The functional theory of politics. M. Robertson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch FR (2005) Die Europäische Union. Geschichte, Institutionen, Prozesse. Fink, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntscher-Rickmann S, Herzig G, Dirninger C (eds) (2006) Europäischer Konvent und Verfassungsgebung als Annäherung an eine europäische Republik? Böhlau, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziller J (2004) The European Constitution. Kluwer Law International, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuleeg M, Savat M, Derosier J-P (eds) (2005) Eine Verfassung für Europa mit 25 Mitgliedstaaten. Vielfalt und Einheit zugleich. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jahn, E. (2015). From the Constitutional Treaty to the Lisbon Treaty: Is the European Union on the Way to Becoming a Federal State?. In: German Domestic and Foreign Policy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47929-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics