Skip to main content

Social Media Applications for Knowledge Exchange in Organizations

Requirements, Application, and User Acceptance in Industrial and Scientific Settings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovations in Knowledge Management

Abstract

With the broad success of Web 2.0, organizations have become interested in using social media for professional applications. To date related research has mainly focused on the social impact of social media. However, little is known about the circumstances under which employees will invest time in using social media, especially the perceived benefits and its barriers within enterprises need further research. Different aspects of organizational knowledge management bring along different requirements for social-media-based solutions. This chapter focusses on providing both a theoretical background on social media acceptance and concepts, as well as empirical findings from practice and research investigating acceptance-relevant needs and demands of social media users in different contexts. Findings from practice corroborate that the complexity of the plethora of communication paths can be supported by social media. Findings from research reveal that regarding the users’ (emotive) needs is critical when dealing with sensitive communication/data. Combining both practice and research tries to bridge the knowledge gap existing in fast paced developments like social media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.intraworlds.com.

  2. 2.

    http://www.ipt.fraunhofer.de/en.html.

  3. 3.

    http://www.comm.rwth-aachen.de.

  4. 4.

    http://www.yammer.com.

  5. 5.

    http://www.liferay.com.

  6. 6.

    http://www.researchgate.net.

  7. 7.

    http://www.academia.edu.

  8. 8.

    http://www.mendeley.com.

  9. 9.

    www.ibridgenetwork.org.

  10. 10.

    techtransfer.ima.kit.edu.

  11. 11.

    www.easyaccessip.org.uk.

  12. 12.

    “Innovation through Expert-Communities in the time of demographic change” http://www.projekt-inec.de.

  13. 13.

    http://www.production-research.de.

  14. 14.

    i.e. http://www.intraworlds.com.

References

  1. Bloom, D.E., Canning, D.: Global demographic change: Dimensions and economic significance. Working Paper 10817, National Bureau of Economic Research (October 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sturgeon, T.J.: Does manufacturing still matter? The organizational delinking of production from innovation. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Howells, J.R.: Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Stud. 39(5–6), 871–884 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, pp. 1360–1380. (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers, E.M., Adhikarya, R.: Diffusion of innovations: an up-to-date review and commentary. Commun. Yearbook 3, 67–81 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holzinger, A.: Human-computer interaction and knowledge discovery (HCI-KDD): what is the benefit of bringing those two fields to work together? In: Availability, Reliability, and Security in Information Systems and HCI, pp. 319–328. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alagöz, F., Calero Valdez, A., Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M., Dorner, S., Holzinger, A.: From cloud computing to mobile internet, from user focus to culture and hedonism: the crucible of mobile health care and wellness applications. In: 2010 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Applications (ICPCA), pp. 38–45. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., Wentling, T.: Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. J. Knowl. Manage. 7(1), 64–77 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bughin, J., Manyika, J., et al.: How Businesses are Using Web 2.0: A McKinsey Global Survey. McKinsey Quarterly Web Exclusive. McKinsey and Company (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Calero Valdez, A., Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M.: Personality influences on etiquette requirements for social media in the work context. In: Human Factors in Computing and Informatics, pp. 427–446. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Majchrzak, A., Wagner, C., Yates, D.: Corporate wiki users: results of a survey. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Wikis. WikiSym ‘06, pp. 99–104. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hemsley, J., Mason, R.M.: The nature of knowledge in the social media age: implications for knowledge management models. In: 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), pp. 3928–3937. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Facebook: Facebook reports first quarter 2013 results. Accessed September 12th 2013: http://investor.fb.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=761090 (2013)

  14. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., Tseng, B.: Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In: Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis, pp. 56–65. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sigurbjörnsson, B., Van Zwol, R.: Flickr tag recommendation based on collective knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 327–336. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Drucker, P.F.: Knowledge-worker productivity: the biggest challenge. The knowledge management yearbook 2000–2001 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maier, R.: Knowledge Management Systems: Information and Communication Technologies for Knowledge Management. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davenport, T.H., Pruzak, L.: Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paroutis, S., Al Saleh, A.: Determinants of knowledge sharing using web 2.0 technologies. J. Knowl. Manage. 13(4), 52–63 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Richter, A., Stocker, A., Müller, S., Avram, G.: Knowledge management goals revisited—a cross-sectional analysis of social software adoption in corporate environments. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Australasian Conference on Information Systems. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maier, R., Remus, U.: Towards a framework for knowledge management strategies: process orientation as strategic starting point. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2001, p. 10. IEEE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prusak, L.: Where did knowledge management come from? IBM Syst. J. 40(4), 1002–1007 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaiser, S., Müller-Seitz, G., Lopes, M.P., e Cunha, M.P.: Weblog-technology as a trigger to elicit passion for knowledge. Organization 14(3), 391–412 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Giglia, E.: Academic social networks: its time to change the way we do research. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 47(2), 345–349 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bauer, T.N., Erdogan, B.: Organizational socialization: The effective onboarding of new employees. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Aberdeen Group: Onboarding 2013—A New Look at New Hires. http://aberdeen.com/Aberdeen-Library/8383/RA-strategic-onboarding-talent.aspx (2013)

  27. Willyerd, K.: Social tools can improve employee onboarding. http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2012/12/social_tools_can_improve_e.html (December 2012)

  28. Schuh, G., Aghassi, S.: Technology transfer portals: a design model for supporting technology transfer via social software solutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schuh, G., Wemhöner, H., Drescher, T.: Technologiemanagement als lebensfähiges System gestalten. In: Mieke, C., Braunisch, D. (eds.) Innovative Produktionswirtschaft, pp. 59–77. Logos Verlag, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schuh, G., Klappert, S. (eds.): Technologiemanagement. Produktion und Management. Springer, Heidlberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schuh, G., Aghassi, S., Calero Valdez, A.: Supporting technology transfer via web-based platforms. In: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services, Proceedings of the PICMET’ 2013 Conference. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Czarnitzki, D., Licht, G., Rammer, C., Spielkamp, A.: Rolle und Bedeutung von Intermediären in Wissens-und Technologietransfer. ifo Schnelldienst 54(04), 40–49 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Leupold, M.: Technologietransfer im Web 2.0—wie das Wissen heute in die Welt kommen kann. Wissensmanagement 1 (2010) 21ff

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., Hinkle, R.: Predicting and understanding voting in american elections: effects of external variables. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, pp. 173–195. (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340 (1989). ArticleType: research-article/Full publication date: Sep., 1989/Copyright (c) 1989 Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bagozzi, R.P., Davis, F.D., Warshaw, P.R.: Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Hum. Relat. 45(7), 659–686 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., Larsen, K.R.: The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12, 780 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pedersen, P.: An adoption framework for mobile commerce. Towards the E-Society, 643–655 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lu, J., Yu, C.S., Liu, C., Yao, J.E.: Technology acceptance model for wireless internet. Internet Res. 13(3), 206–222 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang, H., Yoo, Y.: It’s all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decis. Support Syst. 38(1), 19–31 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478 (2003). ArticleType: research-article/Full publication date: Sep., 2003/Copyright (c) 2003 Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hartwick, J., Barki, H.: Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Manage. Sci. 40(4), 440–465 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., Andrews, D.: The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Comp. Hum. Behav. 20(2), 201–223 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schmitz-Urban, A., Bender, J., Gudergan, G., Schaar, A.K., Calero Valdez, A., Löcker, A.K., Eraß me, D., Hofmann, J., Ziefle, M., Jakobs, E.M.: Einsatz von Experten-Communitys zur Sicherung der Innovationsfähigkeit im demografischen Wandel. In Jeschke, S., ed.: Innovationsfähigkeit im demografischen Wandel, pp. 87–104. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/New York

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schaar, A.K., Calero Valdez, A., Ziefle, M.: The impact of user diversity on the willingness to disclose personal information in social network services. In: Human Factors in Computing and Informatics, pp. 174–193. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R.: Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the neo personality inventory. Psychol. Assess. 4(1), 5 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Vinitzky, G.: Social network use and personality. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1289–1295 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Correa, T., Hinsley, A.W., de Ziga, H.G.: Who interacts on the web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(2), 247–253 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hughes, D.J., Rowe, M., Batey, M., Lee, A.: A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(2), 561–569 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rothwell, J.D.: In the Company of Others: An Introduction to Communication. McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: Politeness: Some universals in language usage, vol. 4. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Brecher, C., Jeschke, S., Schuh, G., Aghassi, S., Arnoscht, J., Bauhoff, F., Fuchs, S., Jooß, C., Karmann, W.O., Kozielski, S., et al.: Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Welter, F., Jooß, C., Richert, A., Jeschke, S., Brecher, C.: Organisation and management of integrative research. In: Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2011/2012, pp. 275–285. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jooß, C., Welter, F., Richert, A., Jeschke, S., Brecher, C.: A management approach for interdisciplinary research networks in a knowledge-based society—Case study of the cluster of excellence “Integrative Production Technology for High-wage Countries”. In: Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2011/2012, pp. 375–382. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Welter, F., Vossen, R., Richert, A., Isenhardt, I.: Network management for clusters of excellence-a balanced-scorecard approach as a performance measurement tool. In: Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2009/2010, pp. 195–207. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Campbell, D.T.: Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience. In: Derry, S.J., Schunn, C.D., Gernsbacher, M.A. (Eds.) Interdisciplinary Collaboration: An Emerging Cognitive Science, pp. 3–21. Psychology Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jirotka, M., Lee, C.P., Olson, G.M.: Supporting scientific collaboration: methods, tools and concepts. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW) 22(4–6), 667–715 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zheng, X., Ke, G., Zeng, D.D., Ram, S., Lu, H.: Next-generation team-science platform for scientific collaboration. Intell. Syst. IEEE 26(6), 72–76 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Li, J., Muller-Tomfelde, C., Robertson, T.: Designing for distributed scientific collaboration: a case study in an animal health laboratory. In: 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), pp. 373–381. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Müller-Tomfelde, C., Li, J., Hyatt, A.: An integrated communication and collaboration platform for distributed scientific workgroups. In: Human-Computer Interaction—INTERACT 2011, pp. 248–258. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Alves, T.P., Borges, M.R., Vivacqua, A.S.: An environment to support the discovery of potential partners in a research group. In: 2013 IEEE 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), pp. 344–349. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Romano, P., Giugno, R., Pulvirenti, A.: Tools and collaborative environments for bioinformatics research. Briefings Bioinf. 12(6), 549–561 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Calero Valdez, A., Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M.: State of the (net) work address developing criteria for applying social networking to the work environment. Work: A J. Prev. Assess. Rehabil. 41, 3459–3467 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Schaar, A.K., Calero Valdez, A., Ziefle, M., Eraßme, D., Löcker, A.K., Jakobs, E.M.: Reasons for using social networks professionally. In: Social Computing and Social Media, pp. 385–396. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Calero Valdez, A., Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M., Holzinger, A.: Enhancing interdisciplinary cooperation by social platforms. In: Human Interface and the Management of Information. Information and Knowledge Design and Evaluation, pp. 298–309. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Vaegs, T., Welter, F., Jooß, C., Leisten, I., Richert, A., Jeschke, S.: Cluster terminologies for promoting interdisciplinary scientific cooperation in clusters of excellence. INTED2013 Proceedings, pp. 5805–5812. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Jooß, C., Welter, F., Leisten, I., Richert, A., Schaar, A., Calero Valdez, A., Nick, E., Prahl, U., Jansen, U., Schulz, W., Ziefle, M., Jeschke, S.: Scientific cooperation engineering in the cluster of excellence integrative production technology for high-wage countries at RWTH Aachen University. In: ICERI2012 Proceedings. 5th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovations, IATED (19–21 November, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Schaar, A.K., Calero Valdez, A., Ziefle, M.: Publication network visualisation as an approach for interdisciplinary innovation management. In: Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2013 IEEE International. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Calero Valdez, A., Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M., Holzinger, A., Jeschke, S., Brecher, C.: Using mixed node publication network graphs for analyzing success in interdisciplinary teams. In: Active Media Technology, pp. 606–617. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Calero Valdez, A., Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M.: Measuring interdisciplinary performance by analyzing mixed node publication networks. In Hinze, S., Lottmann, A., eds.: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators: Translational twists and turns: Science as a socio-economic endeavor, pp. 594–597. IFQ, Berlin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M.: Privacy and data security in E-health: Requirements from the users perspective. Health Inf. J. 18(3), 191–201 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Arning, K., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: “Same same but different” How service contexts of mobile technologies shape usage motives and barriers. In: HCI in Work and Learning, Life and Leisure, pp. 34–54. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. The authors would like to thank all partners from the research projects for their constructive collaboration and feedback. The studies from the “iNec” project have been funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the European Social Fund (ESF) within the program “Innovationsfähigkeit im demographischen Wandel” under the reference number 01HH11045. The work related to the project “Integrative Production Technology in High Wage Countries” has been funded by the Excellence Initiative of the German federal and state governments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Calero Valdez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Calero Valdez, A., Schaar, A.K., Bender, J., Aghassi, S., Schuh, G., Ziefle, M. (2016). Social Media Applications for Knowledge Exchange in Organizations. In: Razmerita, L., Phillips-Wren, G., Jain, L. (eds) Innovations in Knowledge Management. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 95. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47827-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47827-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47826-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47827-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics