Skip to main content

Abstract

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) may be used effectively and safely for up to three levels from L2 to L5 using a “sliding window” approach. The technique described here is associated with a risk of complications similar to that reported for traditional anterior approaches, with the advantage of decreasing the risk of abdominal wall weakness or herniation. For selected cases, it can also be performed at L1–L2 and L5–S1, although another approach might be preferred at L5–S1 due to the risks associated with mobilization of the iliac vessels and to the presence of the iliac wing. Because of the new design of implants and development of this technique, the risk of contralateral compression of dural sac and nerve roots during insertion of interbody devices becomes quite rare; and the procedure is now quite safe. Thus, OLIF can be applied to other procedures besides discectomy and interbody fusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bederman SS, Kreder HJ, Weller I, et al. The who, what and when of surgery for the degenerative lumbar spine: a population-based study of surgeon factors, surgical procedures, recent trends and reoperation rates. Can J Surg. 2009;52:283–90.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK. Spinal-fusion surgery – the case for restraint. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:722–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, et al. United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine. 2006;31:2707–14.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sasso RC, Best NM, Mummaneni PV, et al. Analysis of operative complications in a series of 471 anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Spine. 2005;30:670–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mummaneni PV, Haid RW, Rodts GE. Lumbar interbody fusion: state-of-the-art technical advances. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1:24–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eck JC, Hodges S, Humphreys SC. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:321–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shen FH, Samartzis D, Khanna AJ, et al. Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusions. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:373–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Regan JJ, Hansen Y, McAfee PC. Laparoscopic fusion of the spine: minimally invasive spine surgery: a prospective multicenter study evaluating open and laparoscopic lumbar fusion. Spine. 1999;24:402–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chung SK, Lee SH, Lim SR, et al. Comparative study of laparoscopic L5–S1 fusion versus open mini-ALIF, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:613–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zdeblick TA, David SM. A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4–5 fusion. Laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 2000;25:2682–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaiser MG, Haid Jr RW, Subach BR, et al. Comparison of the mini-open versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:97–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayer HM. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 1997;22:691–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saraph V, Lerch C, Walochnik N, et al. Comparison of conventional versus minimally invasive extraperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:425–31.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brau SA. Mini-open approach to the spine for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: description of the procédure, results and complications. Spine J. 2002;2:216–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Silvestre C, Mac Thiong JM, Hilmi R, Roussouly P. Minimally invasive anterior oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). Description of the technique and complications on 179 patients. Asian Spine J. 2012 Jun;6(2):89–97. doi: 10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.89. Epub 2012 May 31

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clément Silvestre MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Silvestre, C., Roussouly, P. (2016). Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion. In: Pinheiro-Franco, J., Vaccaro, A., Benzel, E., Mayer, H. (eds) Advanced Concepts in Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47756-4_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47756-4_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47755-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47756-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics