Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why Do We Want Data for Learning? Learning Analytics and the Laws of Media

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Ubiquitous Learning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

Abstract

With the increase of online education programs, learning analytics (LA) tools have become a popular addition to many learning management systems (LMS). As a tool for supporting learning in an educational context, LA has generated some controversy among scholars. Therefore, in this text, we aim to provide a theoretical and analytical understanding of the approach and its implications for teaching and learning. To achieve this, we apply McLuhan’s semiotic analysis of media (1988). The “Laws of Media” questions are asked about LA tools: What do they enhance, make obsolete, retrieve, and reverse into. By answering these questions, we outline which practices of teaching and learning are more likely to become common when LA tools are taken into use more widely and which others will be relegated. In the analysis, we point out that LA tools enhance prediction and personalization of learning, while they displace certain teachers’ skills, personal interaction between teachers and students, and qualitative interpretation and assessment of learning. Simultaneously, LA retrieves behaviourist views of learning and urges discussion about data literacy. Taken to the limits, LA reverses its effects and becomes a tool for supporting awareness and reflection in teaching and learning. We consider these contributions relevant for understanding and reflecting on the type of pedagogies that LA supports, the implicit values it holds, and the changes it introduces into educational practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beer, D., & Burrows, R. (2013). Popular culture, digital archives and the new social life of data. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloxham, S., & Boyd, P. (2012). Accountability in grading student work: Securing academic standards in a twenty-first century quality assurance context. British Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 615–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41(5), 537–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clow, D. (2012). The learning analytics cycle: Closing the loop effectively. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 134–138). ACM, April 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H. (2010). Defining and monitoring academic standards in Australian higher education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffrin, C., Corrin, L., de Barba, P., & Kennedy, G. (2014). Visualizing patterns of student engagement and performance in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 83–92). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs, A. W. (1979). Myths in education: Beliefs that hinder progress and their alternatives. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, R. D., Broadfoot, P., & Claxton, G. (2004). Developing an effective lifelong learning inventory: The ELLI project. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 247–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Joksimovic, S. (2014). Current state and future trends: A citation network analysis of the learning analytics field. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 231–240). ACM, March 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Liddo, A., Shum, S. B., Quinto, I., Bachler, M., & Cannavacciuolo, L. (2011). Discourse-centric learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 23–33). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrichson, A. (2013). Beyond clickometry: Analytics for constructivist pedagogies. International Journal on E-Learning, 12(4), 333–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drachsler, H., Bogers, T., Vuorikari, R., Verbert, K., Duval, E., Manouselis, N., et al. (2010). Issues and considerations regarding sharable data sets for recommender systems in technology enhanced learning. Procedia Computer Science, 1(2), 2849–2858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2012). Confidence in learning analytics. In LAK12: 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durall, E., & Gros, B. (2014). Learning analytics as a metacognitive tool. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 380–384).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durall, E., & Toikkanen, T. (2013). Feeler: Feel good and learn better. A tool for promoting reflection about learning and well-being. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology-Enhanced Learning (pp. 83–89). CEUR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duval, E. (2011). Attention please!: Learning analytics for visualization and recommendation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 9–17). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R., & Shum, S. B. (2011). Learning analytics to identify exploratory dialogue within synchronous text chat. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 99–103). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandy, O. (2012). Statistical Surveillance. In D. Lyon, K. Haggerty, & K. Ball (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 125–132). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, S., Ives, C., Rahman, N., & Ferri, A. (2011). AAT: A tool for accessing and analysing students’ behaviour data in learning systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 174–179). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halford, S., Pope, C., & Weal, M. (2013). Digital futures? Sociological challenges and opportunities in the emergent semantic web. Sociology, 47(1), 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan, M. T. (1994). Tracking: From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, D. (2010). Spies in the house of learning: A typology of surveillance in online learning environments. Edge2010, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St Johns, Newfoundland, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, A. N. N. A., & Pongsajapan, R. (2012). Student-centered learning analytics. CNDLS Thought Papers, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, R., & Bayne, S. (2005). Issues of surveillance and disciplinary power in online learning environments. In R. Land & S. Bayne (Eds.), Education in cyberspace (pp. 165–178). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinonen, T. (2012). Towards p2p learning: What media and whose peer? In A. Botero, A. Paterson, J. Saad-Sulonen (Eds.) Towards peer-production in public services: Cases from Finland (pp. 51–59). Helsinki: Aalto University Publications/Croosover 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer, L., Heathcote, E., & Dawson, S. (2013). Informing pedagogical action: Aligning learning analytics with learning design. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1439–1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2011). Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social data. In M. Gold (Ed.), Debates in the digital humanities (pp. 460–475). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazza, R., & Dimitrova, V. (2004). Visualising student tracking data to support instructors in web-based distance education. In Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters (pp. 154–161). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media. The extensions of man. London: Sphere Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M., & McLuhan, E. (1988). Laws of media: The new science (Vol. 1). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, T. (2010). The future of security? Surveillance operations at homeland security fusion centers. Social Justice, 37(2–3), 84–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, P. (2012). Whither privacy? Surveillance & Society, 10(3/4), 344–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., & Price, M. (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model: how the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2014). Data entry: Towards the critical study of digital data and education. Learning, Media and Technology, (ahead-of-print), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shum, S. B., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social learning analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1965). Review lecture: The technology of teaching. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 427–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Society for Learning Analytics. (2013). Retrieved March 30, 2015 from http://www.solaresearch.org/mission/about/

  • Subotzky, G., & Prinsloo, P. (2011). Turning the tide: A socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa. Distance Education, 32(2), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. (2013). Surveillance schools: Security, discipline and control in contemporary education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Harmelen, M., & Workman, D. (2012). Analytics for learning and teaching. CETIS Analytics Series, 1(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbert, K., Drachsler, H., Manouselis, N., Wolpers, M., Vuorikari, R., & Duval, E. (2011). Dataset-driven research for improving recommender systems for learning. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 44–53). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., Duval, E., Santos, J. L., Van Assche, F., Parra, G., & Klerkx, J. (2014). Learning dashboards: An overview and future research opportunities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1499–1514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbert, K., Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., & Duval, E. (2012). Dataset-driven research to support learning and knowledge analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesley, D. (2002). A critical analysis on the evolution of e-learning. International Journal on E-learning, 1(4), 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Seidner (Eds.), Self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 13–39). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aalto School of Arts, Design and Architecture, Department of Media, Medialab, Learning Environments Research Group, Miestentie 3, 3100, Espoo, Finland

    Eva Durall Gazulla & Teemu Leinonen

Authors
  1. Eva Durall Gazulla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teemu Leinonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Durall Gazulla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Facultat de Pedagogia, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Begoña Gros

  2. Athabasca University, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Kinshuk

  3. Department of Psychology and Education, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

    Marcelo Maina

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Durall Gazulla, E., Leinonen, T. (2016). Why Do We Want Data for Learning? Learning Analytics and the Laws of Media. In: Gros, B., Kinshuk, ., Maina, M. (eds) The Future of Ubiquitous Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47723-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47724-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation