Skip to main content

Correlation Analysis on Influencing Factors of English Writing and Non-English Major Tibetan College Students’ English Writing Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) 2014 Conference Proceedings
  • 647 Accesses

Abstract

This study aims to research on the correlations between the five aspects in English writing, viz., content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics, and the three important factors that affect students’ writing quality, viz., learners’ English proficiency, writing strategy, and feedback. The researcher compared statistically 108 non-English major Tibetan college students’ writing score in their first year of college. During this academic year, they were required to take the English writing course; the evaluating scheme of the tests and compositions stayed the same. A 118 English compositions of eight students in this year were investigated and analyzed to reveal the development of the five aspects in their writing. Five of these eight students were interviewed in the period of their writing course so that more influencing factors can be discovered. By the end of their study in the first year, questionnaires were distributed to the 108 students. The data from their questionnaire and five aspects of their writing score were analyzed statistically. The analysis of the above-mentioned data show that: (1) English writing quality of these learners improved prominently after study in college for 1 year; (2) four of the five aspects in writing—content, organization, vocabulary, and language use—have shown improvement of different levels with exceptional but explainable changes, and the interviews can explain why the improvement is not persistent, while mechanics does not have a stable pattern of development; (3) in most cases, content, organization, vocabulary, and language use can be predicted by English proficiency and writing strategy, but cannot be predicted by feedback; mechanics cannot be predicted by these three influencing factors. In the end, implications of this study and suggestions for further studies are proposed. If positive factors can be reinforced and negative ones deleted, both English writing’s learning and teaching can be more effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bachman, L. F. (1999). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. (2002). Factors associated with foreign language writing anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 35(5), 647–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Larios, J. R., Murphy, L., & Manchon, R. (1999). The use of restructuring strategies in EFL writing: a study of Spanish learners of English as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 13–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enginarlar, H. (1993). Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing. System, 21(2), 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao, Y., Badger, R., & Zheng, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santangelo, T., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2007). Self-regulated strategy development: A validated model to support students who struggle with writing. Learning Disabilities, 5(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical modal of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 259–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, M., Harris, K. R. & Graham, S. (1998). Self-regulated strategy development and the writing process: Effects on essay writing and attributions. Exceptional Children, 64(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (1989). Communicative competence, language proficiency, and beyond. Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 138–156. doi:10.1093/applin/10.2.138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., & Dong, Y. (2010). The justification of teacher-guided error correction of Chinese college students’ English writing. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Bimonthly), 33(3), 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wible, D., Kuo, C., Chien, F., Liu, A., & Tsao, N. (2001). A web-based EFL writing environment—integrating information for learners, teachers, and researchers. Computer & Education, 37(3), 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2007). Teaching writing in second and foreign language classrooms. Beijing: World Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, L. (2008). Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing actions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baina Xia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xia, B. (2015). Correlation Analysis on Influencing Factors of English Writing and Non-English Major Tibetan College Students’ English Writing Development. In: Zhang, Q., Yang, H. (eds) Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) 2014 Conference Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47490-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics