Abstract
This study aims to research on the correlations between the five aspects in English writing, viz., content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics, and the three important factors that affect students’ writing quality, viz., learners’ English proficiency, writing strategy, and feedback. The researcher compared statistically 108 non-English major Tibetan college students’ writing score in their first year of college. During this academic year, they were required to take the English writing course; the evaluating scheme of the tests and compositions stayed the same. A 118 English compositions of eight students in this year were investigated and analyzed to reveal the development of the five aspects in their writing. Five of these eight students were interviewed in the period of their writing course so that more influencing factors can be discovered. By the end of their study in the first year, questionnaires were distributed to the 108 students. The data from their questionnaire and five aspects of their writing score were analyzed statistically. The analysis of the above-mentioned data show that: (1) English writing quality of these learners improved prominently after study in college for 1 year; (2) four of the five aspects in writing—content, organization, vocabulary, and language use—have shown improvement of different levels with exceptional but explainable changes, and the interviews can explain why the improvement is not persistent, while mechanics does not have a stable pattern of development; (3) in most cases, content, organization, vocabulary, and language use can be predicted by English proficiency and writing strategy, but cannot be predicted by feedback; mechanics cannot be predicted by these three influencing factors. In the end, implications of this study and suggestions for further studies are proposed. If positive factors can be reinforced and negative ones deleted, both English writing’s learning and teaching can be more effective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bachman, L. F. (1999). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296.
Cheng, Y. (2002). Factors associated with foreign language writing anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 35(5), 647–656.
De Larios, J. R., Murphy, L., & Manchon, R. (1999). The use of restructuring strategies in EFL writing: a study of Spanish learners of English as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 13–44.
Enginarlar, H. (1993). Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing. System, 21(2), 193–204.
Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33–53.
Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315–339.
Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359–382.
Miao, Y., Badger, R., & Zheng, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200.
Santangelo, T., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2007). Self-regulated strategy development: A validated model to support students who struggle with writing. Learning Disabilities, 5(1), 1–20.
Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical modal of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 259–291.
Sexton, M., Harris, K. R. & Graham, S. (1998). Self-regulated strategy development and the writing process: Effects on essay writing and attributions. Exceptional Children, 64(3).
Spolsky, B. (1989). Communicative competence, language proficiency, and beyond. Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 138–156. doi:10.1093/applin/10.2.138.
Wang, W., & Dong, Y. (2010). The justification of teacher-guided error correction of Chinese college students’ English writing. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Bimonthly), 33(3), 63–75.
Wible, D., Kuo, C., Chien, F., Liu, A., & Tsao, N. (2001). A web-based EFL writing environment—integrating information for learners, teachers, and researchers. Computer & Education, 37(3), 297–315.
Williams, J. (2007). Teaching writing in second and foreign language classrooms. Beijing: World Publishing Corporation.
Xiao, L. (2008). Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing actions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 217–236.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Xia, B. (2015). Correlation Analysis on Influencing Factors of English Writing and Non-English Major Tibetan College Students’ English Writing Development. In: Zhang, Q., Yang, H. (eds) Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) 2014 Conference Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47490-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47490-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47489-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47490-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)