Advertisement

Classification Technique for HSI

  • Liguo WangEmail author
  • Chunhui Zhao
Chapter
  • 2.3k Downloads

Abstract

Classification is one of the most basic and most important research content of the hyperspectral data processing (Richards and Jia in Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. Springer, Berlin, 2006). Classification is an analytical technique of describing the land object target or class, with the main task of a process of giving a class mark to each pixel point of the data volume to generate the thematic map.

Keywords

Kernel Function Training Sample Class Weighting Empirical Risk Statistical Learning Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Chang C-I, Ji B (2006) Weighted abundance constrained linear spectral mixture analysis. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 44:378–388CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen C-H, Tu T-M (1996) Computation reduction of the maximum likelihood classifier using the winograd identity. Pattern Recognit 29(7):1213–1220Google Scholar
  3. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J (2004) Support vector machine introduction. In: Guozheng L, Meng W, Huajun Z (eds). Electronic Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  4. Emami H Introducing correctness coefficient as an accuracy measure for sub pixel classification results. http://www.ncc.org.ir/articles/poster83/H.Emami.pdf
  5. Ji B, Chang Chein-I, Jensen JO, Jensen JL (2004) Unsupervised constrained linear Fisher’s discriminant analysis for hyperspectral image classification. In: 49th annual meeting, SPIE international symposium optical science and technology, vol 49. Imaging spectrometry IX (AM105), Denver, CO, pp 2–4Google Scholar
  6. Jia XP, Richards JA (1994) Efficient maximum likelihood classification for imaging spectrometer data sets. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 32(2):274–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Karpinski M, Werther T (1989) VC dimension and uniform learnability of sparse polynomials and rational functions. SIAM J Computing. Preprint 8537-CS, Bonn UniversityGoogle Scholar
  8. Richards JA, Jia XP (2006) Remote sensing digital image analysis, 3rd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Shevade SK, Keerthi SS, Bhattacharyya C et al (2000) Improvements to the SMO algorithm for SVM regression. IEEE Trans on Neural Networks 11(5):1188–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sohn Y, Rebello NS (2002) Supervised and unsupervised spectral angle classifiers. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 68(12):1271–1280Google Scholar
  11. Song Q, Hu WJ, Xie WF (2002) Robust support vector machine with bullet hole image classification. IEEE Trans Systems Man and Cybern Part C 32:440–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Suykens JAK, Brabanter JD, Lukas L, Vandewalle J (2002) Weighted least squares support vector machines: robustness and sparse approximation. Neurocomputing 48(1–4):85–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vapnik VN (2000) The nature of statistical learning theory. In: Zhang X (ed). Tsinghua University press, BeijingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Defense Industry Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harbin Engineering UniversityHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations