Abstract
What do offshore bank accounts, money smuggling, and shell companies have in common? They were all part of two decades of rampant bribery initiated by the German company, Siemens AG. Siemens, a multinational electronics company known for innovation and quality, admitted to bribing governments for contracts. Siemens faced accusations of bribery and other corporate corruption in 20 countries, including Argentina, Bangladesh, Greece, and Nigeria, making the Siemens case the largest bribery scandal in modern corporate history.
China Mobile executive Shi Wanzhong received bribes totaling US $5.1 million in exchange for equipment contracts with Siemens. After the scandal was revealed, Shi was tried for economic crimes and given the death penalty, while the middleman who facilitated the bribes was given a 15-year prison sentence.
The Siemens case forces us to address the issues of bribery, corruption, and unfair competition, as well as certain philosophical questions about moral relativism and universal moral values in the context of a globalizing economy.
“Your economic achievements will only stand on firm ground if you diminish corruption.” (Stephan Rothlin, Eighteen Rules for Becoming a Top Notch Player, 2004)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
One perspective expressing skepticism about Siemens’ turnaround and Transparency International’s praise for it appeared on the website of the Corporate Crime Reporter, which recently published a piece, “Transparency International and the Greenwashing of Siemens” (Corporate Crime Reporter 2014), claiming that TI was absolving Siemens of its involvement in corruption because it had applied for funding from the Siemens Integrity Initiative, established as part of the firm’s settlement with the World Bank which required it to put US$100 million into civil society fighting corruption. Our own review of the Corporate Crime Reporter’s evidence suggests that the case alleging an improper relationship between TI and Siemens is highly doubtful, since the allegations of ongoing corruption at Siemens are taken from Siemens’ own “Annual Report” (Siemens 2013), filed, as required by law, with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The evidence cited by the Corporate Crime Reporter is taken from a list of legal proceedings disclosed by Siemens involving past cases of bribery and other corrupt practices. A careful review of the list, however, will show that none of these cases allege violations happening after Loescher and his team began the turnaround at Siemens. They consistently indicate that Siemens has cooperated with regulatory and other governmental authorities in the investigation and settlement of all previous allegations, some of which are still pending. It seems unfair to accuse Siemens of ongoing involvement in corruption, when the evidence clearly refers to ongoing attempts to settle previous claims against the firm. Similarly, if the charges against Siemens are without foundation, so is the charge that TI failed to do “due diligence” in reaching its decision to apply for a grant from the Siemens Integrity Initiative. The wisdom of TI’s decision to apply for such a grant may be questioned, but in no way should it be distorted into the serious and unsubstantiated charge of “greenwashing.”
- 2.
The social benefits resulting from allocational efficiency depend upon a number of conditions that roughly correspond to the assumptions operative in the principle of commutative justice. The outcomes of market activity may be regarded as optimizing not only justice but also efficiency so long as these conditions are generally respected. For example, the prices for various goods and services cannot be dictated by any entity exercising monopoly power and, among other things, must be both “informationally efficient” and “transactionally or operationally efficient” (Investopedia 2014).
References
Abrams, S. (2011, June 30). Siemens bribery case and the anti-corruption new world-order. Business Insider. Retrieved July 16, 2012, from http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-06-30/wall_street/30012545_1_siemens-ag-chinese-court-sec-charges
Barboza, D., & Thomas, K. (2014, May 13). Former head of Glaxo in China is accused of Bribery. The New York Times. Retrieved June 26, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/15/business/international/glaxosmithkline-china.html
Caragliano, D. (2012, December 12). Is China really the 80th-most-corrupt country on earth? The Atlantic. Retrieved June 27, 2014, from http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/12/is-china-really-the-80th-most-corrupt-country-on-earth/266172/
China CSR. (2007, September 19). Siemens China investigating business consultants. Retrieved August 14, 2012, from http://www.chinacsr.com/en/2007/09/19/1695-siemens-china-investigating-business-consultants/
China CSR. (2008, December 16). Siemens concludes bribery proceedings for dealings in China and other countries. Retrieved June 20, 2015, from http://www.chinacsr.com/en/2008/12/16/3898-siemens-concludes-bribery-proceedings-for-dealings-in-china-and-other-countries/
China Tech News. (2007, August 22). Siemens China business under investigation. Retrieved July 16, 2012, from http://www.chinatechnews.com/2007/08/22/5784-siemens-china-business-under-investigation
Corporate Crime Reporter. (2014, April 2). Transparency international and the greenwashing of Siemens. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com/news/200/siemens-and-the-greenwashing-of-transparency-international/
Criminal Law. (1997). Criminal law of the People’s Republic of China. Retrieved on June 21, 2015 from http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/cgvienna/eng/dbtyw/jdwt/crimelaw/t209043.htm
Dietz, G., & Gillespie, N. (2012, March 26). Rebuilding trust: How Siemens atoned for its sins. The Guardian: Guardian Sustainable Business. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/recovering-business-trust-siemens
FCPA. (2012). Foreign corrupt practices act. Retrieved July 17, 2012, from http://www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/
Freebase. (2009). China mobile. Retrieved August 13, 2012, from http://www.freebase.com/view/en/china_mobile
Gao, D. (2008, December 15). Record US fine ends Siemens bribery scandal. The Guardian. Retrieved August 14, 2012, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/dec/16/regulation-siemens-scandal-bribery
HK Department of Justice. (2003). Chapter 204. Independent commission against corruption ordinance. Retrieved June 28, from http://www.legislation.gov.hk/blis_pdf.nsf/6799165D2FEE3FA94825755E0033E532/A3E9ED78744D8631482575EE004CB37D/$FILE/CAP_204_e_b5.pdf
HK Department of Justice. (2014a). Chapter 201. Prevention of bribery ordinance. Retrieved June 28, 2014, from http://www.legislation.gov.hk/blis_pdf.nsf/6799165D2FEE3FA94825755E0033E532/660A25EA15B8C9D6482575EE004C5BF1/$FILE/CAP_201_e_b5.pdf
HK Department of Justice. (2014b). Chapter 554. Elections (Corrupt and illegal conduct) Ordinance. Retrieved June 28, 2014, from http://www.legislation.gov.hk/blis_pdf.nsf/4f0db701c6c25d4a4825755c00352e35/4F5BE2F0A9A7AE91482575EF0019E514/$FILE/CAP_554_e_b5.pdf
HKEDC. (2013). Publications and Resources: Case Studies. Hong Kong Ethics Development Centre. Retrieved June 28, 2014, from http://www.hkedc.icac.hk/english/publications/case_studies.php
ICAC. (2014a). Brief history. Retrieved June 27, 2014, from http://www.icac.org.hk/en/about_icac/bh/index.html
ICAC. (2012). Operations department: Statutory duty. Retrieved June 27, 2014, from http://www.icac.org.hk/en/operations_department/sd/index.html
Investopedia. (2014). Allocational efficiency. Retrieved June 24, 2014, from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/allocationalefficiency.asp
Jieqi, L. (2011, June 30). Siemens bribery scandal ends in death sentence. Caixin Online. Retrieved July 16, 2012, from http://english.caixin.com/2011-06-30/100274546.html
Jin, S. (2013, September 25). Multinationals in China must operate according to law. China Today. Retrieved June 25, 2014, from http://www.chinatoday.com.cn/english/economy/2013-09/25/content_569718.htm
Jones, D. (2010, February 15). CEO Loescher uses his moral compass to steer Siemens. USA Today. Retrieved July 24, 2012, from http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/management/advice/2010-02-14-siemens-CEO-advice_N.htm
Kollewe, J. (2014, May 28). GlaxoSmithKline faces criminal investigation by Serious Fraud Office. The Guardian. Retrieved June 26, 2014, from http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/may/28/serious-fraud-office-investigates-glaxosmithkline
Lichtblau, E. (2008, December 15). Siemens pays 1.34 billion in fines. The New York Times. Retrieved July 16, 2012, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/16/business/worldbusiness/16siemens.html?_r=1&ref=technology
Liu, J. (2007, August 23). Siemens fired 20 employees in China last year for misconduct. Bloomberg. Retrieved August 14, 2012, from http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=agDA.ZGHGw3I&refer=germany
Loescher, P. (2012, November). How I Did It…The CEO of Siemens on using a scandal to drive change. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved June 20, 2014, from http://hbr.org/2012/11/the-ceo-of-siemens-on-using-a-scandal-to-drive-change/ar/1
Lopez, L. (2011, June 21). China Mobile executive gets death penalty for taking bribes from Siemens. Business Insider. Retrieved July 16, from http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-06-21/news/29974810_1_siemens-bribes-death-sentence
Millker, C., &, Schubert, S. (2009, February 13). At Siemens, bribery was just a line item. PBS. Retrieved July 12, 2012, from http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/bribe/2009/02/at-siemens-bribery-was-just-a-line-item.html
Moral Relativism. (2002). Moral relativism: What’s it all about? Retrieved July 17, 2012, from http://www.moral-relativism.com/
OECD. (2011). Convention on combating bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions and related documents. Retrived on June 27, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/ConvCombatBribery_ENG.pdf
People’s Daily. (2011, June 22). China court gives verdict in Siemens bribery case. Retrieved July 17, 2012, from http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90776/90882/7417043.html
Racanelli, V. (2012, March 10). The culture changer. Barrons. Retrieved August 13, 2012, from http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424052748704759704577265510752521758.html#articleTabs_article%3D1
Roberts, D. (2010, July 8). The higher costs of bribery in China. Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved July 16, 2012, from http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content /10_29/b4187011931530.htm
Scarboro, C. (2011, June 21). SEC charges Siemens AG for engaging in worldwide bribery. Securities and Exchange Commission. Retrieved July 16, 2012, from http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-294.htm
Shanghai Daily. (2011, June 21). China Mobile gets death in bribery case. Retrieved July 16, 2012, from http://www.china.org.cn/china/201106/21/content_22831176.htm
Shapiro, A. (2008, December 16). Siemens hit with $1.6 billion fine in bribery case. NPR. Retrieved July 19, 2012, from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=98317332
Siemens AG. (2008, December 15). Siemens AG reaches a resolution with German and U.S. authorities. Retrieved July 24, 2012, from http://www.siemens.com/press/en/pressrelease/?press=/en/pressrelease/2008/corporate_communication/axx20081219.htm
Siemens AG. (2009, January). Siemens business conduct guidelines. Corporate Compliance Office. Retrieved June 20, 2014, from https://www.siemens.ca/web/portal/en/AboutUs/Documents/BusinessConductGuidelines.pdf
Siemens AG. (2013, November 27). Annual report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the securities and exchange act of 1934, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://www.siemens.com/investor/pool/en/investor_relations/financial_publications/sec_filings/2013/20_f.pdf
Steptoe. (2009, January 8). International law advisory: Record US and German settlements of the Siemens case reflect new realities of corruption cases. Retrieved July 17, 2012, from http://www.steptoe.com/publications-5819.html
The Christian Science Monitor. (2008, December 17). Big victory against global bribery. Retrieved July 16, 2012, from http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2008/1217/p08s01-comv.html
The Economist. (2008, December 17). The Siemens scandal: Bavarian Baksheesh. Retrieved July 17, 2012, from http://www.economist.com/node/12800474
The Economist. (2010, September 9). A giant awakens. Retrieved July 17, 2012, from http://www.economist.com/node/16990709
Transparency International. (2001). Corruption perceptions index 2001. Retrieved June 27, 2014, from http://archive.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2001
Transparency International. (2011). Bribe payers index 2011. Retrieved June 27, 2014, from http://issuu.com/transparencyinternational/docs/bribe_payers_index_2011?e=2496456/2293452
Transparency International. (2013). 2013 corruption perceptions index. Retrieved June 27, from http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/
Transparency International. (2014) Corruption perceptions index: Overview. Retrieved June 28, 2014, from http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview
UNGC. (2013a). Overview of the UN global compact. Retrieved June 27, 2014, from http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/index.html
UNGC. (2013b). Global compact principle 10. Retrieved June 27, 2014, from http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/principle10.html
UNGC. (2013c). Transparency and anti-corruption. Retrieved June 27, 2014, from http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/anti-corruption.html
Wyatt, E. (2011, December 13). Former Siemens executives are charged with bribery. The New York Times. Retrieved July 18, 2012, from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/14/business/global/former-siemens-executives-charged-with-bribery.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rothlin, S., McCann, D. (2016). Competitors: Fighting Corruption in the Marketplace. In: International Business Ethics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47434-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47434-1_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47433-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47434-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)