A Model for Sustainable Site Layout Design of Social Housing with Pareto Genetic Algorithm: SSPM

  • Yazgı Badem Aksoy
  • Gülen Çağdaş
  • Özgün Balaban
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 527)

Abstract

Nowadays as the aim to reduce the environmental impact of buildings becomes more apparent, a new architectural design approach is gaining momentum called sustainable architectural design. Sustainable architectural design process includes some regulations itself, which requires calculations, comparisons and consists of several possible conflicting objectives that need to be considered together. A successful green building design can be performed by the creation of alternative designs generated according to all the sustainability parameters and local regulations in conceptual design stage. As there are conflicting criteria’s according to LEED and BREAM sustainable site parameters, local regulations and local climate conditions, an efficient decision support system can be developed by the help of Pareto based non-dominated genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) which is used for several possibly conflicting objectives that need to be considered together. In this paper, a model which aims to produce site layout alternatives according to sustainability criteria for cooperative apartment house complexes, will be mentioned.

Keywords

Sustainable site layout design Multi objective genetic algorithm LEED-BREEAM 

References

  1. 1.
    Bentley, P.J.: Aspects of evolutionary design by computers. In: Roy, R., Furuhashi, T., Chawdhry, P.K. (eds.) Advances in Soft Computing, pp. 99–118. Springer, London (1999). Department of Computer Science, University College, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rivard, H.: Computer assistance for sustainable building design. In: Smith, I.F.C. (ed.) Intelligent Computing in Engineering and Architecture, EG-ICE 2006, pp. 559–575. Springer, Berlin (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cole, R.J., Larsson, N.: GBTool user manual, Green Building Challenge (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trusty, W.B., Meil, J.K.: Introducing ATHENA™ v. 2.0: an LCA based decision support tool for assessing the environmental impact of the built environment. In: Proceedings of the eSim 2002, the Canadian Conference on Building Energy Simulation, Montréal, Canada (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, W., Zmeureanu, R., Rivard, H.: Applying multi objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization. Build. Environ. 40(11), 1512–1525 (2005). ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Radford, A.D., Gero, J.S.: Design by Optimization in Architecture, Building and Construction. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harputlugil, G.U.: Analysis and simulation on energy performance based design. J. Megaron 6(1), 1–12 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mitchell, M.: An introduction to genetic algorithms. A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 7–12 (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley, Chichester (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lahanas, M., Baltas, D., Zamboglou, N.: A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective anatomy based dose optimization in HDR brachytherapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 48(3), 399–415 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zelinska, A.L., Church, R., Jankowski, P.: Sustainable urban land use allocation with spatial optimization. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. 22(6), 601–622 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    USGBC: LEED for new construction & major renovations, v. 2.2, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    BREEAM: BRE Environmental Assessment Method, UK (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Istanbul Zoning Regulations, Turkey (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    TS825: Rules of thermal insulation in buildings, Turkish Standards Institute, Turkey (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yazgı Badem Aksoy
    • 1
  • Gülen Çağdaş
    • 1
  • Özgün Balaban
    • 1
  1. 1.Istanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations