Interrogating Interactive and Responsive Architecture: The Quest of a Technological Solution Looking for an Architectural Problem

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 527)

Abstract

Interactive Architecture and Responsive Architecture are provocative fields of investigation and have potentially disruptive and far reaching effects for architecture. However it can be argued that these fields haven’t been developed as a direct response to previously identified architectural demands. Instead, they have risen as consequence of new technology availability, with ad hoc discussions in the context of the built environment. In order to test this hypothesis, 229 publications were examined and narrowed down to 77 papers and 41 design projects, which were systematically analyzed. The primary objective of this investigation is to understand Interactive Architecture’s development with regard to justification. This understanding provides us with the basis to speculate on the possibly expanding introduction of extraneous technological solutions to the discipline of architecture. The research findings indicate a mismatch between theoretical discourse and projects being developed in those fields. They also describe the current state of Interactive Architecture research.

Keywords

Interactive architecture Responsive architecture Literature analysis Design projects analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Sterk, T.: Responsive architecture: user-centered interactions within the hybridized model of control. In: Proceedings of the Game Set and Match II, On Computer Games, Advanced Geometries, and Digital Technologies, Netherlands, Episode Publishers, pp. 494–501 (2006a)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kolarevic, B.: Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing. Taylor & Francis, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glanville, R.: An intelligent architecture. Convergence: Int. J. Res. N. Media Technol. 7(2), 12–24 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yiannoudes, S.: Kinetic digitally-driven architectural structures as marginal objects–a conceptual framework. FOOTPRINT 4(6), 41–54 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fox, M., Kemp, M.: Interactive Architecture. Princeton Architectural Press, New york (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pask, G.: Architectural relevance of cybernetics. In: Architectural Design, September, pp. 494–496 (1969)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eastman, C.: Adaptive-conditional architecture. In: Proceedings of the Design Research Society’s Conference Manchester 1971, Academy Editions, London, pp. 51–57 (1971)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Negroponte, N.: Soft Architecture Machines. MIT press, Cambridge, MA (1975)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oosterhuis, K.: Hyperbodies: Towards an E-motive Architecture. Birkhauser Publishers, Basel, Switzerland (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schnädelbach, H.: Adaptive architecture: a conceptual framework. In: Proceedings of Media City (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jaskiewicz, T.: DYNAMIC DESIGN MATTER[S]. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Critical Digital: What Matters(s)?, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, Cambridge (USA) (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee, J.D.: Adaptable, kinetic, responsive, and transformable architecture: an alternative approach to sustainable design. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bullivant, L.: Responsive Environments: Architecture, Art and Design. V&A Publications, London (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Achten, H.: Buildings with an attitude. In: Proceedings of the 31st eCAADe Conference, vol. 2, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Achten, H., Kopřiva, M.: A design methodological framework for interactive architecture. In: Proceedings of the 28th eCAADe Conference, pp. 169–177 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adi, M.N., Roberts, D.J.: The use of online virtual environments to assess the appeal of interactive elements within buildings, IEEE, pp. 189–196 (2011a)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adi, M.N., Roberts, D.J.: Using VR to assess the impact of seemingly life like and intelligent architecture on people’s ability to follow instructions from a teacher. In: 2011 IEEE International Symposium on VR Innovation (ISVRI), IEEE, pp. 25–31 (2011b)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Azhar, M., Malik, F.R., Sajjad, M., Irfan, M., Gu, B.W., Park, W.J., Baik, S.W.: VIP-emulator: to design interactive architecture for adaptive mixed reality space. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Data Mining, Civil and Mechanical Engineering (ICDMCME 2014), International Institute of Engineers, Indonesia (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bier, H., de Bodt, K., Galle, J.: SC: prototypes for interactive architecture. In: Zha, H., Pan, Z., Thwaites, H., Addison, A.C., Forte, M. (eds.) VSMM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4270, pp. 21–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Biloria, N.: Interactive environments: a multi-disciplinary approach towards developing real-time performative spaces. In: Yang, H.S., Malaka, R., Hoshino, J., Han, J.H. (eds.) ICEC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6243, pp. 254–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Biloria, N.: Interactive morphologies: an investigation into integrated nodal networks and embedded computation processes for developing real-time responsive spatial systems. Front. Archit. Res. 1(3), 259–271 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.foar.2012.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bongers, B.: Interactivating spaces. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Systems Research in the Arts, Informatics and Cybernetics (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Briscoe, D., Hadilou, A.: Collective intelligence: an analytical simulation of social interaction with architectural system. In: Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2013), pp. 375–384 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cetkovic, A.: Unconscious perception in a responsive architectural environment. In: Proceedings of MutaMorphosis Conference (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chiu, H.: Research on hybrid tectonic methodologies for responsive architecture. In: CAADRIA 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Crotch, J., Mantho, R., Horner, M.: SPACE MAKING –Between the virtual and the physical. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 03(07), 403–414 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dalton, C., Harrison, J.D.: Conceptualisation of an intelligent salutogenic room environment. In: Breedon, P. (ed.) Smart Design, pp. 87–95. Springer, London (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Davis, D., Salim, F.D., Burry, J.: Designing responsive architecture: mediating analogue and digital modelling in studio. In: Proceedings of the Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), pp. 155–164 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Davis, F., Roseway, A., Carroll, E., Czerwinski, M.: Actuating mood: design of the textile mirror. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, pp. 99–106 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    De Abreu, S.C.: Permeability regimes between man and interactive spaces. In: Proceedings of the 31st eCAADe Conference, vol. 1, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 18–20 September 2013, pp. 449-457 (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Diniz, N.V., Duarte, C.A., Guimarães, N.M.: Mapping interaction onto media façades. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fortiadou, A.: Responsive architecture and software: a prototype simulation software for responsive constructions. In: eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fox, M.: Flockwall: a full-scale spatial environment with discrete collaborative modules. In: ACADIA 09: reForm()–Building a Better Tomorrow, pp. 90–97 (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gillispie, D., Calderon, C.: A framework towards designing responsive public information systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of the Arab Society for Computer Aided Architectural Design, Alexandria, Egypt, pp. 767–782 (2007)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gschwendtner, G., Plank, C.M.: From an architecture of sign to an architecture of consciousness. In: Proceedings of Architecture and Phenomenology, Second International Conference, Kyoto Seika University (2009)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hu, C., Fox, M.: Starting from the micro: a pedagogical approach to designing interactive architecture. In: Smart Architecture: Integration of Digital and Building Technologies, Savannah, Georgia (2005)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Huyghe, J., Wouters, N., Geerts, D., Vande Moere, A.: LocaLudo: card-based workshop for interactive architecture. In: CHI 2014 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, New York, pp. 1975–1980 (2014)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jaskiewicz, T., Aprile, W.A., van der Helm, A.: Creative approach to the design and prototyping of experimental smart spaces, case studies from the interactive environments minor. In: Balandin, S., Dunaytsev, R., Koucheryavy, Y. (eds.) ruSMART 2010. LNCS, vol. 6294, pp. 135–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kemp, R.M.: Interactive interfaces in architecture: the new spatial integration of information, gesture and cognitive control. In: Proceedings from ACADIA 08: Silicon + Skin–Biological Processes and Computation, pp. 422–429 (2008)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Khan, O.: Open columns: a carbon dioxide (CO2) responsive architecture. In: CHI 2010 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Khoo, C.K.: Sensory morphing skins. In: Proceedings of the 30th eCAADe, Czech Republic (2012)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Khoo, C.K., Salim, F., Burry, J.: Designing architectural morphing skins with elastic modular systems. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 9(4), 397–420 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Khoo, C.K., Salim, F.D.: Designing elastic transformable structures. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA, Hong Kong, pp. 143–152 (2011)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kirkegaard, P.H., Hans Isak Worre, F.: Development and evaluation of a responsive building envelope. In: Proceedings of Adaptive Architecture, London (2011)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kirkegaard, P.H., Parigi, D.: On control strategies for responsive architectural structures. In: IASS-APCS 2012 Proceedings from Spatial Structures to Space Structures, Korea (2012)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kirkegaard, P.H., Sorensen, J.D.: Robustness analysis of kinetic structures. In: Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symposium, Valencia (2009)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kolodziej, P., Rak, J.: Responsive building envelope as a material system of autonomous agents. In: Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2013), vol. 945, p. 954 (2013)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kroner, W.M.: An intelligent and responsive architecture. Autom. Constr. 6(5), 381–393 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lelieveld, C., Voorbij, L.: Dynamic material application for architectural purposes. Adv. Sci. Technol. 56, 595–600 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Liang, H.-N., Nancy, D., Man, K.L., Wan, K., Zhang, N., Lim, E.G.: Real-time environmental sensing-adaptive surfaces for architecture. In: 3rd International Conference on Ambient Computing, Applications, Services and Technologies, pp. 74–79 (2013)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lin, H.C., Jeng, T., Chen, C.: Reimaging humane cities: interaction design, city sense, and smart living. Int. J. Affect. Eng. 12(2), 155–159 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Maragkoudaki, A.; No-mech kinetic responsive architecture: kinetic responsive architecture with no mechanical parts, IEEE, pp. 145–150 (2013)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Meagher, M.: Responsive architecture and the problem of obsolescence. Int. J. Archit. Res.: ArchNet-IJAR 8(3), 95–104 (2014)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Merali, R., Long, D.: Actuated responsive truss. Modular Robots: The State of the Art, 36 (2010)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Meyboom, A., Johnson, G., Wojtowicz, J.: Architectronics: towards a responsive environment. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 9(1), 77–98 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mohammed-Amin, R.K., von Mammen, S., Boyd, J.E.: ARCS architectural chameleon skin. In: Proceedings of the 31st eCAADe Conference (2013)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mounajjed, N., Zualkernan, I.A.: From simple pleasure to pleasurable skin: an interactive architectural screen. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, ACM, p. 30 (2011)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ochs, S.W.: Architectural sociability as a strategy to drive technology integrations into architectural structures and smart environments. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 10(2), 301–318 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Oh, S., Patrick, V., Llach, D.C.: Typologies of architectural interaction: a social dimension. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design, Society for Computer Simulation International, p. 7 (2014)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Oosterhuis, K., Bier, H.: Real time behavior in ONL-architecture. In: Proceedings of Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality, Lisbon (2004)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Pan, C., Jeng, T.: Exploring sensing-based kinetic design for responsive architecture. In: Conference of Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA). (2008)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Pan, C., Jeng, T.: A robotic and kinetic design for interactive architecture. In: Proceedings of SICE Annual Conference 2010, IEEE, pp. 1792–1796 (2010)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Park, J.W.: Interactive kinetic media facades: a pedagogical design system to support an integrated virtual-physical prototyping environment in the design process of media facades. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 12(2), 237–244 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Park, J.W., Huang, J., Terzidis, K.: A tectonic approach for integrating kinesis with a building in the design process of interactive skins. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 10(2), 305–312 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Pasold, A., Foged, I.: Performative responsive architecture powered by climate. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) (2010)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Pohl, I.M., Loke, L.: Engaging the sense of touch in interactive architecture. In: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Pohl, I.M., Loke, L.: Touch toolkit: a method to convey touch-based design knowledge and skills, ACM Press, pp. 251–258 (2013). doi:10.1145/2540930.2540957
  68. 68.
    Pohl, I.M., Urs, H.: Sensitive surface. A reactive tangible surface. In: CAAD Futures 2011: Designing Together, ULg (2011)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Röcker, C., Kasugai, K.: Interactive architecture in domestic spaces. In: Wichert, R., Van Laerhoven, K., Gelissen, J. (eds.) Constructing Ambient Intelligence, vol. 277, pp. 12–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Salim, F.D., Burry, J.R., Peers, J., Underwood, J.: Augmented spatiality. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 10(2), 275–300 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Salim, F.D., Mulder, H., Burry, J.: A system for form fostering. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia CAADRIA 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Salim, F.D., Mulder, H., Burry, J.R.: Form fostering: a novel design approach for interacting with parametric models in the embodied virtuality. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 16, 135–150 (2011)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Salim, F.D., Mulder, H., Jaworski, P.: Demonstration of an open platform for tangible and social interactions with responsive models. In: ACADIA2010, pp. 227–233 (2010)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Sharaidin, M.K., Salim, F.D.: Affordable, performative, and responsive. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA, Hong Kong, pp. 113–122 (2011)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sherbini, K., Krawczyk, R.: Overview of intelligent architecture. In: 1st ASCAAD International Conference, e-Design in Architecture KFUPM, Dhahran (2004)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Stein, J., Fisher, S.: Ambient storytelling experiences and applications for interactive architecture. In: AMBIENT 2013, The Third International Conference on Ambient Computing, Applications, Services and Technologies, pp. 23–28 (2013)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Sterk, T.D.E.: Using actuated tensegrity structures to produce a responsive architecture. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture - ACADIA (2003)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sterk, T.D.E.: Building upon Negroponte: a hybridized model of control suitable for responsive architecture. Autom. Constr. 14(2), 225–232 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Sterk, T.: Shape control in responsive architectural structures–current reasons & challenges. In: Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring, San Diego, CA, USA (2006b)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Takeuchi, Y.: Synthetic space: inhabiting binaries. In: CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM pp. 251–260 (2012)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Uçar, B.: Constant redefinition of relations in responsive environments: unpredictability and boredom as generative impulses. In: Proceedings of the 15th Generative Art Conference GA2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ushigome, Y., Niiyama, R., Nishimura, K., Tanikawa, T., Hirose, M.: Archi/e machina: interactive architecture based on tensegrity. In: 2010 16th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM), IEEE, pp. 55–62 (2010)Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Velikov, K., Thün, G., O’Malley, M., Simbuerger, W.: Nervous ether: soft aggregates, interactive skins. Leonardo 47(4), 344–351 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Wasfi, A.: Architecture as a second nature. J. Sustain. Archit. Civ. Eng. 7(2), 3–9 (2014)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wiberg, M., Stolterman, E.: Environment interaction: character, challenges & implications for design. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, ACM, pp. 15–22 (2008)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Yueh-Sung, W., Jia-Yih, C., Yu-Pin, M.A., Cheng-An, P., Tay-Sheng, J.: Eco-machine: a green robotic ecosystem for sustainable environments. In: Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2013), vol. 925, p. 934 (2013)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Zarin, R., Fallman, D.: Ambient Interactive Architecture: Enriching Urban Spaces with Low-cost, Lightweight Interactive Lighting. In: Colour and Light in Architecture_First International Conference 2010 Proceedings (2010)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Zerefos, S.C., Kotsiopoulos, A.M., Pombortsis, A.: Responsive architecture: an integrated approach for the future. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture, ACADIA, p. 245 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations