Advertisement

Migratory Movements of Homo Faber: Mapping Fab Labs in Latin America

  • David M. Sperling
  • Pablo C. Herrera
  • Rodrigo Scheeren
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 527)

Abstract

The present paper is a mapping study of digital fabrication laboratories in Latin America. It presents and discusses results from a survey with 31 universities’ fab labs, studios and independent initiatives in Latin America. The objective of this study is fourfold: firstly, to draw the cultural, social and economic context of implementation of digital fabrication laboratories in the region; secondly, to synthesize relevant data from correlations between organizational structures, facilities and technologies, activities, types of prototypes, uses and areas of application; thirdly, to draw a network of people and institutions, recovering connections and the genealogy of these fab labs; and fourthly, to present some fab labs that are intertwined with local questions. The results obtained indicate a complex “homo faber” network of initiatives that embraces academic investigations, architectural developments, industry applications, artistic propositions and actions in social processes.

Keywords

Digital fabrication Fab labs Latin america Mapping 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Gabi Celani (LAPAC-UNICAMP) for the suggestions and comments made during the development of this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Flusser, V.: The Factory in The Shape of Things. Reaktion Books, London (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Holm, E.J.: What are Makerspaces, Hackerspaces, and Fab Labs?. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2548211. (2015). Accessed 24 Jan 2015
  3. 3.
    Abrams, J., Hall, P. (eds.): Else/where: Mapping. New Cartographies of Networks and Territories, p. 12. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Herrera, P.C., Juaréz, B.: Fabrication Laboratories: Problems and possibilities of implementation in Latin America. In: Proceedings of the Fab 9 Research Stream. Yokohama, Keiko University SFC. http://www.fablabinternational.org/fab-lab-research/proceedings-from-the-fab-9-research-stream (2013)
  5. 5.
    Rocha, A.J.M.: Architecture theory 1960–1980: emergence of a computational perspective. PhD Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaona, N.: Changing the way industries operate is driving force behind maker movement, Future Source Summit, México http://www.futuresourcesummit.com/news/changing-the-way-industries-operate-is-driving-force-behind-maker-movement/ (2014)
  7. 7.
    Smith, E.: Benom Juarez on the future of digital fabrication in Peru, make:, April, 24th http://makezine.com/2014/04/24/benom-juarez-on-the-future-of-digital-fabrication-in-peru/ (2014)
  8. 8.
    Herrera, P.C., Juaréz, B.: Perspectivas en los Laboratorios de Fabricación Digital en Latinoamérica. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics, SiGraDi, Fortaleza, Brazil, pp. 285–289 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hatch, M.: The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in the New World of Crafters, Hackers, and Tinkerers. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blikstein, P.: Digital Fabrication and ‘Making’ in Education: The Democratization of Invention. In: Walter-Herrmann, J., Büching, C. (eds.) FabLab: Of Machines Makers and Inventors, pp. 203–222. Transcript Publishers, Bielefeld (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rifkin, J.: The Third Industrial Revolution How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anderson, C.: Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Crown Publishing Group, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Troxler, P.: Making the Third Industrial Revolution – The Struggle for Polycentric Structures and a New Peer-Production Commons in the FabLab Community. In: Walter-Herrmann, J., Büching, C. (eds.) FabLab: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors, pp. 181–198. Transcript Publishers, Bielefeld (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Celani, G.: Digital Fabrication Laboratories: Pedagogy and Impacts on Architectural Education. Nexus Netw. J. 14, 469–482 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leach, N., Weiguo, X.: Machinic Processes: Architecture Biennial Beijing 2010. Tsinhua University, Shangai (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herrera, P.C.: Tecnologías Disruptivas: Programación y Fabricación en Latinoamérica. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics, SiGraDi, Bogotá, Colombia, pp. 213–216 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yuan, P.F., Leach, N.: Fabricating the Future. Tongji University Press, Shangai (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soares, L.: EduCAAD: An X-ray of CAAD education in Brazil. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics, SiGraDi, Fortaleza, Brasil, pp. 255–258 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Self, M., Walker, Ch.: Making Pavilions: AA Intermediate Unit 2 2004–09. Architectural Association, London (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Herrera, P.C.: VBScritp en la educación del arquitecto: Estrategias y métodos durante y después de la implementación In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics, SiGraDi, La Habana, Cuba, 368–371 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Herrera, P.C.: Rhinoscripting y Grasshopper a través de sus instructores: Un estudio de Patrones y usos. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics, SiGraDi, Santa Fé, Argentina, 179–182 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Senske, N.: Fear of Code: An Approach to integrating Computation with Architectural Design. MSc Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Domingues, J.M.: A América Latina e a modernidade contemporânea: uma interpretação sociológica, Belo Horizonte, Editora UFMG (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cox, C.F.: Modernidad y Postmodernidad en América Latina, Bogotá, Escala (1991)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Flusser, V.: Towards a Philosophy of Photography. Reaktion Books, London (2000)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Poerksen, B.: Ethics of enabling ethics. Cybernetics Human Knowing (Exeter: Imprint Academic) 18(3–4), 143–149 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cabral, F.J.S., Baltazar, A.P.: Por uma produção arquitetônica interativa para além do paradigma da representação: a experiência do LAGEAR. In: Anais do III ENANPARQ - 2014, São Paulo (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bernardo, M.V., Cabral F., J.S.: Fabricação digital e variedade fora do contexto industrial. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics: Design in Freedom, pp. 320–323 [=Blucher Design Proceedings, v.1, n.8]. Blucher, São Paulo (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Sperling
    • 1
  • Pablo C. Herrera
    • 2
  • Rodrigo Scheeren
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Sao PauloSao PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Peruvian University of Applied SciencesLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations