ModRule: A User-Centric Mass Housing Design Platform

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 527)

Abstract

This paper presents a novel platform, ModRule, designed and developed to promote and facilitate collaboration between architects and future occupants during the design stage of mass housing buildings. Architects set the design-framework and parameters of the system, which allows the users to set their space requirements, budgets, etc., and define their desired way of living. The system utilizes gamification methodologies as a reference to promote incentives and user-friendliness for the layperson who has little or no architectural background. This enhanced integration of a both bottom-up approach (user-centric/player) with a top-down approach (architect-centric/game-maker) will greatly influence how architects design high rise living. By bridging the gap between the architect and the user, this development aims to instill a greater sense of belonging to people, as well as providing architects with a better understanding of how to give people more control over their living spaces. The paper also presents an evaluation of a design process that employed ModRule.

Keywords

Mass housing Collaborative design Participatory system 

References

  1. 1.
    Bauer, C.: Social questions in housing and community planning. J. Soc. Issues 7(1–2), 1–34 (1951)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bech-Danielsen, C.: De-signed ecology. In: Oksala, T., Lasker, G.E. (eds.) Acta polytechnica Scandinavica. Design. Evolution, Cognition. Selected and edited papers from DEcon 1994 Symposium: Civil engineering and building construction series no. 105, Helsinki, pp. 3–11 (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benrós, D., Duarte, J., Branco, F.: A system for providing customized housing. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures, Sydney, Australia, pp. 153–166 (2007) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blessing, M.: Types of Family Structures. LoveToKnow: http://family.lovetoknow.com/about-family-values/types-family-structures (n.d.)
  5. 5.
    Britannica, T. E.: Prefabrication. Retrieved from Encyclopædia Britannica, 20 August 2013. http://global.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/474611/prefabrication
  6. 6.
    Case, K., Shiller, R.: Forecasting prices and excess returns in the housing market. Real Estate Econ. 18(3), 253–273 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chien, S., Shih, S.: Design through information filtering. In: de Vries, B., van Leeuwen, J., Achten, H. (eds.) Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures, pp. 103–110. Springer, Netherlands (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chuen, H., Huang, J., Krawczyk, R.: i_Prefab Home - customizing prefabricated houses by Internet-Aided design. In: Communicating Space(s), pp. 690–698 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cuperus, Y.: An introduction to open building. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Singapore (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to Gamefulness: defining “Gamification”. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference, (MindTrek 2011), Tampere, pp. 9–15 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fabian, E., Janssen, P., Lo, T.: Group forming: negotiating design via web-based interaction and collaboration. In: Open Systems: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2013), Singapore, pp. 271–280 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frazer, J.: An Evolutionary Architecture. Architectural Association, London (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gao, Y., Su, Y.: Computational design research for high density social housing in China. Glob. Sci. Technol. forum J. Eng. Technol. (2012) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gao, Y., Lo, T., Chang, Q.: Integrated open source architectural design for high density. In: Proceedings of 4th Annual International Conference on Architecture. Athens, Greece (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gerber, A., Molefo, O., Van der Merwe, A.: Documenting open source migration processes for re-use. In: Kotze, P., Gerber, A., van der Merwe, A., Bidwell, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the SAICSIT 2010 Conference - Fountains of Computing Research, pp. 75 – 85. ACM Press (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grimes, O.: Housing for Low-income Urban Families: Economics and Policy in the Developing World. World Bank (1976)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guneet, K.: Participatory approach/community involvement in planning. In: 43rd ISOCARP Congress (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wright, G.: Building the Dream: A Social History of Housing in America. MIT press, Cambridge (1983)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Herr, C., Fischer, T., Wang, H., Ren, W.: Demand-driven generative design of sustainable mass housing for China. In: The Fifth China Urban Housing Conference, China (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huizinga, J.: Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play element in Culture. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1955)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hunicke, R., Leblanc, M., Zubek, R.: MDA: a formal approach to game design and game research. In: 19th National Conference of Artificial Intelligence, p. 5 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Israel, N.: Okohaus, los límites de la participación. La civdad viva: http://www.laciudadviva.org/blogs/?p=14164. Accessed 15 June 2012
  23. 23.
    Kalloc: Fuzor, 30 January 2014. www.kalloctech.com
  24. 24.
    Kapp, K.: The Gamification of Learning and Instruction—Game-Based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education. Wiley, San Francisco (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kelly, A.: Decision Making Using Game Theory: An Introduction for Managers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kendall, S.: Managing Change: the application of Open Building in the INO Bern Hospital. In Design & Health Congress. www.designandhealth.com/Media-Publishing/Papers.aspx. Accessed 29 September 2009
  27. 27.
    Kernohan, D.: User Participation in Building Design and Management: A Generic Approach to Building Evaluation. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1992)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kim, J., Brouwer, R., Kearney, J.: NEXT 21: A Prototype Multi-Family Housing Complex. University of Michigan, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Michigan, Ann Arbor (1993)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lefaivre, L.: Top Down Meets Bottom-up, Spontaneous Interventions: design actions for the common good. Architect Magazine, August 2012 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lo, T.T., Schnabel, M.A., Gao, Y.: Collaborative mass housing design practice with smart models. In: International Conference on Digital Architecture (DADA), Beijing, China (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Madigan, R., Munro, M., Smith, S.J.: Gender and the meaning of the home. Int. J. Urban Regional Res. 14(4), 625–647 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Madrazo, L., Sicilia, A., González, M., Cojo, A.: Barcode housing system: integrating floor plan layout generation processes within an open and collaborative system to design and build customized housing. In: Tidafi, T., Dorta, T. (eds.) Annual Joining Languages, Cultures and Visions: CAAD Futures, PUM, pp. 656– 670 (2009)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mayer, C., Somerville, C.: Residential construction: using the urban growth model to estimate housing supply. J. Urban Econ. 48(1), 85–109 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nikos, A.: Design methods, emergence, and collective intelligence, new science, new urbanism, new architecture? In: Towards a New 21st Century Architecture, Katarxis no. 3 (2004)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Op-ed.: Open Source Architecture (OSArc). domus. http://www.domusweb.it/en/op-ed/2011/06/15/open-source-architecture-osarc-.html. Accessed 15 June 2011
  36. 36.
    Record.: Largest LAN Party. Guinness World Record. http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/3000/largest-lan-party. Accessed 1 December 2007
  37. 37.
    Sass, L., Botha, M.: The instant house: a model of design production with digital fabrication. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 4(4), 109–123 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schnabel, M.: Interplay of Domains. Learning from the Past a Foundation for the Future, Special Publication of Papers Presented at the CAAD Futures 2005 Conference, pp. 11–20. Vienna University of Technology, Vienna (2005)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schnabel, M., Kvan, T.: Spatial understanding in immersive virtual environments. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 1(4), 435–448 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schnabel, M., Kvan, T., Kruijff, E., Donath, D.: The first virtual environment design studio. In: Proceedings of Architectural Information Management, 19th eCAADe Conference, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 394–400 (2001)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Van Gunsteren, L., Binnekamp, R., Van Loon, P.: Open Design, a Stakeholder-oriented Approach in Architecture, Urban Planning, and Project Management. Research in Design Series, vol. 1. IOS Press, Delft (2006)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zichermann, G., Linder, J.: The Gamification Revolution: How Leaders Leverage Game Mechanics to Crush The Competition. McGraw-Hill, Boston (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
  2. 2.Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
  3. 3.University of Hong KongPok Fu LamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations