Advertisement

Time-Varying Matrix Left Pseudoinverse

  • Yunong ZhangEmail author
  • Dongsheng Guo
Chapter
  • 502 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, focusing on time-varying matrix left pseudoinversion, we propose, generalize, develop, and investigate five different ZD models by introducing five different ZFs. In addition, the link between the ZD models and the Getz–Marsden (G-M) dynamic system is discovered and presented for time-varying matrix left pseudoinversion. Computer simulation results further substantiate the theoretical analysis and show the effectiveness of the proposed ZD models derived from different ZFs on solving for the time-varying matrix left pseudoinverse.

Keywords

Left Pseudoinverse Time-varying Matrix Single Sampling Period Convergence Performance Tikhonov Regularization Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Juang LH, Wu MN (2010) Image noise reduction using Wiener filtering with pseudo-inverse. Measurement 43(10):1649–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van der Veen AJ, Talwar S, Paulraj A (1997) A subspace approach to blind space-time signal processing for wireless communication systems. IEEE Trans Signal Process 45(1):173–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lin J, Lin CC, Lo HS (2009) Pseudo-inverse Jacobian control with grey relational analysis for robot manipulators mounted on oscillatory bases. J Sound Vib 326(3–5):421–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Skurichina M, Duin RP (2002) Bagging, boosting and the random subspace method for linear classifiers. Pattern Anal Appl 5(2):121–135CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang BL, Zhang H, Ge SS (2004) Face recognition by applying wavelet subband representation and kernel associative memory. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 15(1):166–177CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perković MD, Stanimirović PS (2011) Iterative method for computing the Moore-Penrose inverse besed on Penrose equations. J Comput Appl Math 235(6):1604–1613CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Courrieu P (2005) Fast computation of Moore-Penrose inverse matrices. Neural Inf Process Lett Rev 8(2):25–29Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo W, Huang T (2010) Method of elementary transformation to compute Moore-Penrose inverse. Appl Math Comput 216(5):1614–1617CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tasi\(\acute{{\rm c}}\) MB, Stanimirovi\(\acute{{\rm c}}\) PS, Petkovi\(\acute{{\rm c}}\) MD (2007) Symbolic computation of weighted Moore-Penrose inverse using partitioning method. Appl Math Comput 189(1):615–640Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang Y, Yi C (2011) Zhang neural networks and neural-dynamic method. Nova Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang Y, Yang Y, Tan N, Cai B (2011) Zhang neural network solving for time-varying full-rank matrix Moore-Penrose inverse. Computing 92(2):97–121CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo D, Zhang Y (2014) Li-function activated ZNN with finite-time convergence applied to redundant-manipulator kinematic control via time-varying Jacobian matrix pseudoinversion. Appl Soft Comput 24:158–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liao B, Zhang Y (2014) From different ZFs to different ZNN models accelerated via Li activation functions to finite-time convergence for time-varying matrix pseudoinversion. Neurocomputing 133:512–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ben-Israel A, Greville TNE (2003) Generalized inverses: theory and applications, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang J (1997) Recurrent neural networks for computing pseudoinverses of rank-deficient matrices. SIAM J Sci Comput 19(5):1479–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Getz NH, Marsden JE (1995) A dynamic inverse for nonlinear maps. In: Proceedings of 34th IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 4218–4223Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Getz NH, Marsden JE (1995) Joint-space tracking of workspace trajectories in continuous time. In: Proceedings of 34th IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 1001–1006Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Getz NH, Marsden JE (1997) Dynamical methods for polar decomposition and inversion of matrices. Linear Algebra Appl 258:311–343CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information Science and TechnologySun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations