Skip to main content

Enhancing Virtual Manipulatives for After-School Tutoring in the Subtraction Unit

  • Conference paper
Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Applications 2015

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 349))

Abstract

The learning of subtraction is essential for elementary students. However, common subtraction misconceptions hinder mathematics underachievers from learning subtraction. Existing remedial instruction focuses on teacher-oriented or self-learning approaches. However, we think that the tutor-based approach with virtual manipulatives can provide students with an opportunity to correct their misconceptions. In this study, a simple tutoring method based on misconception diagnosis is proposed, and supportive virtual manipulatives are prepared for voluntary tutors to use. First, the tutor identifies the tutee’s misconception by conducting a diagnostic test. Then, the tutor applies corresponding virtual manipulatives to help the tutee to understand the concept. For the first case manipulatives from the National Laboratory of Virtual Manipulatives (NLVM’s) are used, and the tutor-tutee interaction patterns are identified by sequential analysis. An enhanced virtual manipulative was then developed according to the aforementioned analysis, and applied to the second case to investigate its performance. Evaluation results indicate that despite the need for further improvement, the tutoring method with the enhanced virtual manipulative is effective for correcting subtraction misconceptions. Finally, recommendations for future research are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakeman, R., Gottman, J.M.: Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, M.: Merging technology & mathematics instruction: The case of virtual manipulatives & geometric concepts. In: Richards, G. (ed.) Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 566–573. AACE, Chesapeake (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bloom, B.S.: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Leadership 41, 4–17 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, J.S., Burton, R.R.: Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematic skills. Cognitive Science 2, 155–192 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruner, J.S.: Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University, Cambridge (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang, K.-E., Lin, M.-L., Chen, S.-W.: Application of the Socratic dialogue on corrective learning of subtraction. Computers & Education 31(1), 55–68 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, L.H.: Enhancement of student learning performance using personalized diagnosis and remedial learning system. Computers & Education 56(1), 289–299 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Flanders, N.A.: Analyzing teaching behavior. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gaustad, J.: Tutoring for at-risk students. Oregon School Study Council, Eugene (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heddens, J.W.: Today’s mathematics, 5th edn. Science Research Associates, Chicago (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heh, J.-S., Li, S.-C., Chang, A., Chang, M., Liu, T.-C.: Diagnosis Mechanism and Feedback System to Accomplish the Full-Loop Learning Architecture. Educational Technology & Society 11(1), 29–44 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Highfield, K., Mulligan, J.T.: The role of dynamic interactive technological tools in preschooler’s mathematical patterning. In: Watson, J., Beswick, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Hobart, vol. 1, pp. 372–381. MERGA, Adelaide (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, T.-H., Liu, Y.-C., Chang, H.-C.: Learning Achievement in Solving Word-Based Mathematical Questions through a Computer-Assisted Learning System. Educational Technology & Society 15(1), 248–259 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hwang, W.-Y., Su, J.-H., Huang, Y.-M., Dong, J.-J.: A Study of Multi-Representation of Geometry Problem Solving with Virtual Manipulatives and Whiteboard System. Educational Technology & Society 12(3), 229–247 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kaput, J.J.: Representation systems and mathematics. In: Janvier, C. (ed.) Problems of Representation in Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, pp. 159–195. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karsenty, R.: Nonprofessional mathematics tutoring for low-achieving students in secondary schools: A case study. Educ. Stud. Math. 74, 1–21 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lesh, R., Post, T., Behr, M.: Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In: Janvier, C. (ed.) Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, pp. 33–40. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, T.C.: Teaching in a wireless learning environment: A case study. Educational Technology & Society 10(1), 107–123 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, T.-C.: Developing Simulation-based Computer Assisted Learning to Correct Students’ Statistical Misconceptions based on Cognitive Conflict Theory, using “Correlation” as an Example. Educational Technology & Society 13(2), 180–192 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, E.Z.F., Chang, M.: Effects of improvement on selective attention: Developing appropriate somatosensory video game interventions for institutional-dwelling elderly with disabilities. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 12(1), 9–18 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Merriam, S.B.: Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moyer, P.S., Bolyard, J.J., Spikell, M.A.: What are virtual manipulatives? Teaching Children Mathematics 8(6), 372–377 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moyer, P.S., Salkind, G., Bolyard, J.J.: Virtual manipulatives used by K-8 teachers for mathematics instruction: Considering mathematical, cognitive, and pedagogical fidelity. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 8(3), 202–218 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Perraton, H.: The role of theory and generation in the practice of distance education (Report No. CE049375). Zentrales Institut fur Fernstudienforschung, Hagen (1987) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED290015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reimer, K., Moyer, P.S.: Third graders learn about fractions using virtual manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 24(1), 5–25 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schoenfeld, A.H.: Cognitive science and mathematics education. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Steen, K., Brooks, D., Lyon, T.: The impact of virtual manipulatives on first grade geometry instruction and learning. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 25(4), 373–391 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tsui, C.Y., Treagust, D.F.: Genetics reasoning with multiple external representations. Research in Science Education 33(1), 111–135 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. VanLehn, K.: Mind bug: The origins of procedural misconceptions. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wasik, B.A., Slavin, R.E.: Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly 28(2), 178–200 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Willis, G.B., Fuson, K.C.: Teaching children to use schematic drawings to solve addition and subtraction word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology 80, 192–201 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yin, R.: Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publishing, Beverly Hills (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Chung Shih .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shih, WC. (2015). Enhancing Virtual Manipulatives for After-School Tutoring in the Subtraction Unit. In: Gen, M., Kim, K., Huang, X., Hiroshi, Y. (eds) Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Applications 2015. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 349. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47200-2_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47200-2_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47199-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47200-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics