Zusammenfassung
Im achten Kapitel referieren wir gängige Planungsmodelle der systematischen Intervention zur Prävention und zur Förderung der Gesundheit. Wir stellen insbesondere PRECEDE/PROCEED und das Intervention Mapping vor, die sich beide ergänzen und die derzeit elaboriertesten Modelle für Interventionsplanungen liefern. Vorgestellt und an einem Beispiel erläutert wird auch das Logic Modelling, das dabei hilft, die Interventionsabsicht für eine definierte Zielgruppe mit den dazu passenden und geeigneten Maßnahmen zu verknüpfen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Bartholemew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., Kok, G., Gottlieb, N. H., & Fernandez, M. E. (2011). Planning health promotion programs (3. Aufl.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Bauman, A. E., Sallis, J. F., Dzewaltowski, D. A., & Owen, N. (2002). Toward a better understanding of the influences on physical activity: the role of determinants, correlates, causal variables, mediators, moderators, and confounders. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2), 5–14.
Bryson, J. (1995). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
CAHS NSW Health Department (1994). Program Management Guidelines for Health Promotion. Sydney: Central Sydney Area of Health Service & NSW Health.
Colquhoun, H., Leeman, J., Michie, S., Lokker, C., Bragge, P., Hempel, S., McKibbon, K. A., Peters, G.-J. Y., Stevens, K. R., Wilson, M. G., & Grimshaw, J. (2014). Towards a common terminology: a simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies. Implementation Science, 9, 51.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pittman.
French, J., & Milner, S. (1993). Should we accept the status quo? Health Education Journal, 52, 98–101.
Green, L. W., & Kreuter, M. W. (1991). Health promotion planning: An educational and environmental approach. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Maycock, B., Howat, P., & Slevin, T. (2001). A decision making model for health promotion advocacy: the case for advocacy of drunk driving control measures. Promotion and Education, 8, 59–64.
McLaughlin, J. A., & Jordan, G. (1999). Logic models: a tool for telling you program’s performance story. Evaluation and Programm Planning, 22, 65–72.
Millar, A., Simeone, R. S., & Carnevale, J. T. (2001). Logic models: a systems tool for performance management. Evaluation and Programm Planning, 24, 73–81.
Molleman, G. R. M., Peters, L. H. M., Hommels, L. H., & Ploeg, M. A. (2003). Assessment Package. Health Promotion Effect Instrument Preffi 2.0. Woerden (NL): NIGZ.
Molleman, G. R. M., Ploeg, M. A., Hosman, C. M. H., & Peters, L. H. M. (2006). Preffi 2.0 - a quality assessment tool. Promotion and Education, 13, 9–14.
Rush, B., & Ogborne, A. (1991). Program logic models: expanding their role and structure for program planning and evaluation. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 12, 167–174.
Taylor-Powel, I. E., Steele, S., & Douglah, M. (2002). Planning a program evaluation. http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html
Wandersman, A., Imm, P., Chinman, M., & Kaftarian, S. (2000). Getting to outcomes: a results-based approach to accountability. Evaluation and Programm Planning, 23, 389–395.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schlicht, W., Zinsmeister, M. (2015). Planungsmodelle. In: Gesundheitsförderung systematisch planen und effektiv intervenieren. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46989-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46989-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46988-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46989-7
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)