Skip to main content

Pediatric Perspective: Inconspicuous Penis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Penile Augmentation

Abstract

An inconspicuous penis refers to a group of conditions that the penis appears to be small but the shaft can be normal or abnormal in size. It could be a source of constant concern for both parents and children. The term “inconspicuous penis” was first used in the literature by Bergeson et al. [1] in 1993. This could be secondary to short penile shaft often termed as micropenis. But more commonly, this inconspicuous appearance is secondary to other causes ranging from congenital conditions such as penoscrotal webbing or megaprepuce, developmental conditions like prepubic adiposity that overhangs the penis, and iatrogenic causes like trapped penis after adhesions secondary to circumcision [2]. However up to now there is still confusion by defining of inconspicuous penis in the literature review and in the clinical practice [3–15].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bergeson PS, Hopkin RJ, Bailey RB, Bailey Jr RB, McGill LC, Piatt JP. The inconspicuous penis. Pediatrics. 1993;92:794–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Srinivasan AK, Palmer LS, Palmer JS. Inconspicuous penis. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:2559–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Shapiro SR. Surgical treatment of the “buried” penis. Urology. 1987;30(6):554–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chuang JH, Chen LY, Shieh CS, Lee SY. Surgical correction of buried penis: a review of 60 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(3):426–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crawford BS. Buried penis. Brit J Plast Surg. 1977;30:96–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maizels M, Zaontz M, Donovan J, Bushnick PN, Firlit CF. Surgical correction of the buried penis: description of a classification system and a technique to correct the disorder. J Urol. 1986;136(1 Pt 2):268–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Herndon CDA, Casale AJ, Cain MP, Rink RC. Long-term outcome of the surgical treatment of concealed penis. J Urol. 2003;170:1695–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Borsellino A, Spagnoli A, Vallasciani S, Martini L, Ferro F. Surgical approach to concealed penis: technical refinements and outcome. Urology. 2007;69(6):1195–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Frenkl TL, Agarwal S, Caldamone AA. Results of a simplified technique for buried penis repair. J Urol. 2004;171(2 Pt 1):826–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang T, Zhang L, Su C, Li Z, Wen Y. Modified penoplasty for concealed penis in children. Urology. 2013;82(3):697–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Casale AJ, Beck SD, Cain MP, Adams MC, Rink RC. Concealed penis in childhood: a spectrum of etiology and treatment. J Urol. 1999;162:1165–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Radhakrishnan J, Razzaq A, Manickam K. Concealed penis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002;18(8):668–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abbas M, Liard A, Elbaz F, Bachy B. Outcome of surgical management of concealed penis. J Pediatr Urol. 2007;3(6):490–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hadidi AT. Buried penis: classification surgical approach. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(2):374–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivas S, Romero R, Parente A, Fanjul M, Angulo JM. Simplification of the surgical treatment of a hidden penis. Actas Urol Esp. 2011;35(5):310–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Devine C, Jordan G, Horton C. Concealed penis. Soc Ped Urol Newsl. 1984;14:115.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kon M. A rare complication following circumcision: the concealed penis. J Urol. 1983;130:573–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Radhakrishnan J, Reyes HM. Penoplasty for buried penis secondary to “radical” circumcision. J Pediatr Surg. 1984;19:629–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee PA, Mazur T, Danish R, Amrhein J, Blizzard RM, Money J, Migeon CJ. Micropenis. I. Criteria, etiologies and classification. Johns Hopkins Med J. 1980;146(4):156–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsang S. When size matters: a clinical review of pathological micropenis. J Pediatr Health Care. 2010;24:231–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Teckchandani N, Bajpai M. Penile length nomogram for Asian Indian prepubertal boys. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(2):352–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Menon PS, Khatwa UA. The child with micropenis. Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67:455–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wiygul J, Palmer LS. Micropenis. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:1462–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Byne W. Developmental endocrine influences on gender identity: implications for management of disorders of sex development. Mt Sinai J Med. 2006;73(7):950–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson P, Maxwell D. Fetal penile length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15(4):308–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zalel Y, Pinhas-Hamiel O, Lipitz S, Mashiach S, Achiron R. The development of the fetal penis – an in utero sonographic evaluation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17(2):129–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Boas M, Boisen KA, Virtanen HE, Kaleva M, Suomi AM, Schmidt IM, Damgaard IN, Kai CM, Chellakooty M, Skakkebaek NE, Toppari J, Main KM. Postnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum testosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154(1):125–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zenaty D, Dijoud F, Morel Y, Cabrol S, Mouriquand P, Nicolino M, et al. Bilateral anorchia in infancy: occurrence of micropenis and the effect of testosterone treatment. J Pediatr. 2006;149:687–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Phillip M, De Boer C, Pilpel D, Karplus M, Sofer S. Clitoral and penile sizes of full-term newborns in two different ethnic groups. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 1996;9:175–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lian WB, Lee WR, Ho LY. Penile length of newborns in Singapore. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2000;13:55–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng P, Chanoine J. Should the definition of micropenis vary according to ethnicity? Horm Res. 2001;55:278–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee J, Ji Y, Lee S, Hwang H, Ryu D, Kim K, et al. Change in penile length in children: preliminary study. Korean J Urol. 2012;53:870–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Camurdan A, Oz M, Ilhan M, Camurdan O, Sahin F, Beyazova U. Current stretched penile length: cross-sectional study of 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years. Urology. 2007;70:572–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cinaz P, Yesilkaya E, Onganlar YH, Boyraz M, Bideci A, Camurdan O, Karaoglu AB. Penile anthropometry of normal prepubertal boys in Turkey. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101:33–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Feldman KW, Smith DW. Fetal phallic growth and penile standards for newborn male infants. J Pediatr. 1975;86(3):395–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vogt K. Microphallus. Emedicine from WebMD. 2006. Retrieved 12 Nov 2007 from http://www.emedicine.com/PED/topic1448.htm.

  37. Ozbey H, Temiz A, Salman T. A simple method for measuring penile length in newborns and infants. BJU Int. 1999;84:1093–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim SY, Jun JS, Lee SG. Normative data of penile length in Korean newborns. Korean J Pediatr. 2008;51:944–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Custer J, Rau R. The Harriet Lane handbook. In: Ballel S, McIntosh P, editors. Endocrinology. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2009. p. 269–300.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chung KH, Choi H, Kim SW. Penile and testicular sizes of Korean children. Korean J Urol. 1987;28:255–8.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Keyes Jr EL. Phimosis, paraphimosis, tumors of the penis. In: Urology. New York: Appleton; 1919. p. 649.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ferro F, Spagnoli A, Spyridakis I, et al. Surgical approach to the congenital megaprepuce. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:1453–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Philip I, Nicholas JL. Congenital giant preputial sac: case reports. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34:507–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Alexander A, Lorenzo AJ, Salle JLP, Rode H. The ventral V-plasty: a simple procedure for the reconstruction of a congenital megaprepuce. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:1741–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Shenoy MU, Rance CH. Surgical correction of congenital megaprepuce. Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;15:593–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gillett MD, Rathbun SR, Husmann DA, Clay RP, Kramer SA. Split-thickness skin graft for the management of concealed penis. J Urol. 2005;173:579–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Chin T, Tsai H, Liu C, Wei C. Modifications of preputial unfurling to reduce postoperative edema in buried penis. J Pediatr Urol. 2005;1(5):327–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Donahoe PK, Keating MA. Preputial unfurling to correct the buried penis. J Pediatr Surg. 1986;21(12):1055–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lee T, Suh HJ, Han JU. Correcting congenital concealed penis: new pediatric surgical technique. Urology. 2005;65(4):789–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Metcalfe PD, Rink RC. The concealed penis: management and outcomes. Curr Opin Urol. 2005;15(4):268–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Perger L, Hanley RS, Feins NR. Penoplasty for buried penis in infants and children: report of 100 cases. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25:175–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Elder J. Abnormalities of the genitalia in boys and their surgical management. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007. p. 3751–4.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Cromie WJ, Ritchey ML, Smith RC, Zagaja GP. Anatomical alignment for the correction of buried penis. J Urol. 1998;160:1482–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Brisson P, Patel H, Chan M, Feins N. Penoplasty for buried penis in children: report of 50 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:421–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sugita Y, Ueoka K, Tagkagi S, Hisamatsu E, Yoshino K, Tanikaze S. A new technique of concealed penis repair. J Urol. 2009;182(4 Suppl):1751–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Byars LT, Tries WC. Some complications of circumcision and their surgical repair. Arch Surg. 1958;76:477–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Blalock HJ, Vemulakonda V, Ritchey ML, Ribbeck M. Outpatient management of phimosis following newborn circumcision. J Urol. 2003;169(6):2332–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Palmer JS, Elder JS, Palmer LS. The use of betamethasone to manage the trapped penis following neonatal circumcision. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 2):1577–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Masih BK, Brosman SA. Webbed penis. J Urol. 1874;111:690–2.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Montasser EK, Mohamed Amin EG. Webbed penis: a new classification. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2010;15(2):50–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wollin M, Duffy PG, Malone PS, Ransley PG. Buried penis. A novel approach. Br J Urol. 1990;65:97–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Dilly AV, Currie BG. Webbed penis. Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;15:447–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Schonfeld WA, Beebe GW. Normal growth and variation in the male genitalia from birth to maturity. J Urol. 1942;48:759–97.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J Urol. 1994;152(1):4–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Massa GG, Langenhorst V, Oostdijk W, Wit JM. Micropenis in children: etiology, diagnosis and therapy. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997;141(11):511–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ludwig G. Micropenis and apparent micropenis-a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Andrologia. 1999;31 Suppl 1:27–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Walsh PC, Wilson JD, Allen TD, Madden JD, Porter JC, Neaves WB, et al. Clinical and endocrinological evaluation of patients with congenital microphallus. J Urol. 1978;120:90–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Büyükgebiz A. Treatment of constitutional delayed puberty with a combination of testosterone esters. Horm Res. 1995;44:32–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Main K, Schmidt IM, Toppari J, Skakkebaek N. Early postnatal treatment of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism with recombinant human FSH and LH. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;146:75–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. de Roux N, Genin E, Carel JC, Matsuda F, Chaussain JL, Milgrom E. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism due to loss of function of the KiSS1-derived peptide receptor GPR54. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(19):10972–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Burstein S, Grumbach MM, Kaplan SL. Early determination of androgen-responsiveness is important in the management of microphallus. Lancet. 1979;2:983–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Schwab J, Kulin HE, Susman EJ, Finkelstein JW, Chinchilli VM, Kunselman SJ, et al. The role of sex hormone replacement therapy on self-perceived competence in adolescents with delayed puberty. Child Dev. 2001;72:1439–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Flank GF. Constitutional delay of growth and puberty. Endocrinol. 2003;13:341–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. http://www.pathology.leedsth.nhs.uk/dnn_bilm/Investigationprotocols/hCGStimulationTest.aspx.

  75. Grumbach MM. A window of opportunity: the diagnosis of gonadotropin deficiency in the male infant. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:3122–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Adan L, Couto-Silva AC, Trivin C, Metz C, Brauner R. Congenital gonadotropin deficiency in boys: management during childhood. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2004;17:149–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. http://imperialendo.co.uk/paedend1.pdf.

  78. Bressani N, di Natale B, Pellini C, Triulzi F, Scotti G, Chiumello G. Evidence of morphological and functional abnormalities in the hypothalamus of growth-hormone-deficient children: a combined magnetic resonance imaging and endocrine study. Horm Res. 1990;34:189–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hamilton J, Blaser S, Daneman D. MR imaging in idiopathic growth hormone deficiency. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1609–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Guthrie RD, Smith DW, Graham CB. Testosterone treatment for micropenis during early childhood. J Pediatr. 1973;83:247–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Bin-Abbas B, Conte FA, Grumbach MM, Kaplan SL. Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and micropenis: effect of testosterone treatment on adult penile size. why sex reversal is not indicated. J Pediatr. 1999;134:579–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Arisaka O, Hoshi M, Kanazawa S, Nakajima D, Numata M, Nishikura K, Kuribayashi T, Kano K, Nakayama Y, Yamashiro Y, et al. Systemic effects of transdermal testosterone for the treatment of microphallus in children. Pediatr Int. 2001;43:134–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Money J, Lehne GK, Pierre-jerome F. Micropenis: adult follow-up and comparison of size against new norms. J Sex Marital Ther. 1984;10:105–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Reilly JM, Woodhouse CR. Small penis and the male sexual role. J Urol. 1989;142(2 Pt 2):569–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Baskin L, Sutherland R, DiSandro M, Hayward S, Lipschutz J, Cunha G. The effect of testosterone on androgen receptors and human penile growth. J Urol. 1997;158:1113–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Kogan SJ, Williams DI. The micropenis syndrome: clinical observations and expectations for growth. J Urol. 1977;118(2):311–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Jones Jr HW, Park IJ, Rock JA. Technique of surgical sex reassignment for micropenis and allied conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;132(8):870–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. O’Brien A, Shapiro AMJ, Frank JO. Phimosis or congenital megaprepuce? Br J Urol. 1994;73:719–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Kim JJ, Lee DG, Park KH, Baek M. A novel technique of concealed penis repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2014;24(2):158–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Frank TD. Editorial comment. BJU Int. 2000;86:526.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang Don Lee MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, S.D. (2016). Pediatric Perspective: Inconspicuous Penis. In: Park, N., Kim, S., Moon, D. (eds) Penile Augmentation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46753-4_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46753-4_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46752-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46753-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics