Abstract
Several agents and their combinations, administered orally, have been studied and used in practice. In reality, little substantial body of evidence derived from organized, randomized, well-controlled scientific studies is available to support any one agent or combination of agents over another for sedating children. Often, dentists use sedative regimens with which they are familiar from their training or what “works well in their hands.” In this chapter, common sedatives and their combinations that have been popularized in professional journals or through sharing of experiences with colleagues are overviewed. A more complete understanding of the success or failure of these agents is dependent on other key factors that will influence, to some degree, these outcomes. Child temperament, parental influence, and the amount of and required technical skills associated with procedures are some of these important factors. They will be discussed in the context of procedural sedation. The review is admittedly incomplete simply because of complexity of the situation and the limited evidence; however, it gives the reader a good perspective of the common challenge in pediatric dental practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Matharu L, Ashley PF. Sedation of anxious children undergoing dental treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(1):CD003877.
Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012;59(2):90–101; quiz 2–3.
Faytrouny M, Okte Z, Kucukyavuz Z. Comparison of two different dosages of hydroxyzine for sedation in the paediatric dental patient. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007;17(5):378–82.
Shapira J, Holan G, Guelmann M, Cahan S. Evaluation of the effect of nitrous oxide and hydroxyzine in controlling the behavior of the pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent. 1992;14(3):167–70.
Avalos-Arenas V, Moyao-Garcia D, Nava-Ocampo AA, Zayas-Carranza RE, Fragoso-Rios R. Is chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine a good option for paediatric dental outpatient sedation? Curr Med Res Opin. 1998;14(4):219–26.
Cathers JW, Wilson CF, Webb MD, Alvarez ME, Schiffman T, Taylor S. A comparison of two meperidine/hydroxyzine sedation regimens for the uncooperative pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27(5):395–400.
da Costa LR, da Costa PS, Lima AR. A randomized double-blinded trial of chloral hydrate with or without hydroxyzine versus placebo for pediatric dental sedation. Braz Dent J. 2007;18(4):334–40.
Lima AR, da Costa LR, da Costa PS. A randomized, controlled, crossover trial of oral midazolam and hydroxyzine for pediatric dental sedation. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003;17(3):206–11.
Shapira J, Kupietzky A, Kadari A, Fuks AB, Holan G. Comparison of oral midazolam with and without hydroxyzine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26(6):492–6.
Chen JW, Seybold SV, Yazdi H. Assessment of the effects of 2 sedation regimens on cardiopulmonary parameters in pediatric dental patients: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28(4):350–6.
Lochary ME, Wilson S, Griffen AL, Coury DL. Temperament as a predictor of behavior for conscious sedation in dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15(5):348–52.
Roberts SM, Wilson CF, Seale NS, McWhorter AG. Evaluation of morphine as compared to meperidine when administered to the moderately anxious pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent. 1992;14(5):306–13.
Song YU, Webb MD. Comparison of the effect of orally versus submucosally administered meperidine on the behavior of pediatric dental patients: a retrospective study. Anesth Prog. 2003;50(3):129–33.
Flacke JW, Bloor BC, Kripke BJ, Flacke WE, Warneck CM, Van Etten AP, Wong DH, Katz RL. Comparison of morphine, meperidine, fentanyl, and sufentanil in balanced anesthesia: a double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 1985;64(9):897–910.
Flacke JW, Flacke WE, Bloor BC, Van Etten AP, Kripke BJ. Histamine release by four narcotics: a double-blind study in humans. Anesth Analg. 1987;66(8):723–30.
Levy JH, Brister NW, Shearin A, Ziegler J, Hug Jr CC, Adelson DM, Walker BF. Wheal and flare responses to opioids in humans. Anesthesiology. 1989;70(5):756–60.
Moore PA, Goodson JM. Risk appraisal of narcotic sedation for children. Anesth Prog. 1985;32(4):129–39.
Czaarnecki ES, Binns WH. The use of chloral hydrate for the apprehensive child. Pa Dent J. 1963;30:40–2.
Barr ES, Wynn RL, Spedding RH. Oral premedication for the problem child: placebo and chloral hydrate. J Pedod. 1977;1(4):272–80.
Moore PA, Mickey EA, Hargreaves JA, Needleman HL. Sedation in pediatric dentistry: a practical assessment procedure. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984;109(4):564–9.
Houpt MI, Sheskin RB, Koenigsberg SR, Desjardins PJ, Shey Z. Assessing chloral hydrate dosage for young children. ASDC J Dent Child. 1985;52(5):364–9.
Needleman HL, Joshi A, Griffith DG. Conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients using chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine, and nitrous oxide–a retrospective study of 382 sedations. Pediatr Dent. 1995;17(7):424–31.
Musial KM, Wilson S, Preisch J, Weaver J. Comparison of the efficacy of oral midazolam alone versus midazolam and meperidine in the pediatric dental patient. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(5):468–74.
Al-Ojaili AM, Gowri V. Clinical profile of patients operated for benign adnexal tumors and the histopathological types. Saudi Med J. 2003;24(12):1334–6.
Martinez D, Wilson S. Children sedated for dental care: a pilot study of the 24-hour postsedation period. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28(3):260–4.
Wilson S, Easton J, Lamb K, Orchardson R, Casamassimo P. A retrospective study of chloral hydrate, meperidine, hydroxyzine, and midazolam regimens used to sedate children for dental care. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(2):107–12.
Leelataweewud P, Vann Jr WF, Dilley DC, Lucas WJ. The physiological effects of supplemental oxygen versus nitrous oxide/oxygen during conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(2):125–33.
Croswell RJ, Dilley DC, Lucas WJ, Vann Jr WF. A comparison of conventional versus electronic monitoring of sedated pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 1995;17(5):332–9.
Sheroan MM, Dilley DC, Lucas WJ, Vann WF. A prospective study of 2 sedation regimens in children: chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine versus midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine. Anesth Prog. 2006;53(3):83–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson, S. (2015). Clinical Sedation Regimens. In: Wilson, S. (eds) Oral Sedation for Dental Procedures in Children. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46626-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46626-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46625-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46626-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)