Advertisement

Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Elbow and Forearm Injuries

  • Walter NoordzijEmail author
  • Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans

Abstract

The elbow is a joint subject to significant mechanical stress. In general, injuries in sports medicine involving the elbow joint can be identified with a patient’s history and adequate physical examination. The role of nuclear medicine in elbow and forearm injuries is rather limited. A specific diagnosis can rarely be made on bone scintigraphy solely, mainly due to the complexity of the elbow joint, in which several structures overlap each other in a small area. Only in very specific diagnoses, including (stress) fractures, lateral and medial epicondylalgia, osteochondritis dissecans, and (a)septic loosening of prosthetic implants, nuclear medicine is able to play an additional role in imaging the elbow. A three-phase bone scintigraphy, using a technetium-99m (99mTc)-labeled diphosphonate complex, is the cornerstone within nuclear medicine imaging and can detect fractures, prosthesis loosening, and inflammation. The exact role of bone scintigraphy in loosening of elbow prostheses is still a matter of debate. For imaging infections after elbow arthroplasty, leukocyte scintigraphy in combination with three-phase bone scintigraphy is the nuclear imaging method of choice. However, anti-granulocyte monoclonal antibody imaging has shown good results in elbow prostheses and may be considered to be an adequate alternative in institutions without of the opportunity to label leukocytes ex vivo. This chapter highlights the role of nuclear medicine in injuries of the elbow and the forearm.

Keywords

Bone Scintigraphy Osteochondritis Dissecans Lateral Epicondylitis Total Elbow Arthroplasty Septic Loosening 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Benjamin HJ, Briner W (2005) Little league elbow. Clin J Sports Med 15:37–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernadino S (2010) Total elbow arthroplasty: history, current concepts and future. Clin Rheumatol 29:1217–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cassas KJ, Cassettari-Wayhs A (2006) Childhood and adolescent sports-related overuse injuries. Am Fam Physician 76:1014–1022Google Scholar
  4. Chicklore S, Gnanasegaran G, Vijayanathan S et al (2012) Potential role of multislice SPECT/CT in impingement syndrome and soft-tissue pathology of the ankle and foot. Nucl Med Comm 34(2):130–139, EPub ahead of printCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eygendaal D, Safran MR (2006) Postero-medial elbow problems in the adult athlete. Br J Sports Med 40:430–434PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerard PS, Gerczuk PZ, Idupuganti R et al (2008) Compartment syndrome caused by computed tomography contrast infiltration seen on a Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate bone scan. Clin Nucl Med 33:36–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Glaudemans AW, Signore A (2010) FDG-PET/CT in infections: the imaging method of choice? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1986–1991PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall TL, Galea AM (1999) Osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Phys Sportsmed 27:75–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Harisankar CNB, Mittal BR, Bhattacharya A et al (2010) Aseptic loosening of elbow prostheses diagnosed on F-18 FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 35:886–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harwood SJ, Camblin JG, Hakki S et al (1994) Use of 99mTechnetium-antigranulocyte monoclonal antibody Fab’ fragments for the detection of osteomyelitis. Cell Biophys 24(25):99–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Iyengar KP, Vinjamuri S (2005) Role of 99mTc Sulesomab in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections. Nucl Med Comm 26:489–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim JM, Mudgal CS, Konopka JF et al (2011) Complications of total elbow arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:328–339PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Little CP, Graham AJ et al (2005a) Outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: comparative study of three implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2439–2448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Little CP, Graham AJ et al (2005b) Total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature in the English language until the end of 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:437–444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Love C, Marwin SE, Palestro CJ (2009) Nuclear medicine and the infected joint replacement. Semin Nucl Med 39:66–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mamanee P, Neira C, Martire JR et al (2000) Stress lesion of the ulna in a throwing athlete. Am J Sports Med 28:261–263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mirowitz SA, London SL (1992) Ulnar collateral ligament injury in baseball pitchers: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 185:573–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Patel M (1998) Upper extremity radionuclide bone imaging: shoulder, arm, elbow, and forearm. Sem Nucl Med 28:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pienimäki T, Takalo RJ, Ahonen AK et al (2008) Three-phase bone scintigraphy in chronic epicondylitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:2180–2184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rineer CA, Ruch DS (2009) Elbow tendinopathy and tendon ruptures: epicondylitis, biceps and triceps ruptures. J Hand Surg Am 34:566–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Shanley E, Thigpen C (2013) Throwing injuries in the adolescent athlete. Int J Sports Phys Ther 8:630–640PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Signore A, Glaudemans AWJM (2011) The molecular imaging approach to image infections and inflammation by nuclear medicine techniques. Ann Nucl Med 25:681–700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sinha AK, Kaeding CC, Wadley GM (1999) Upper extremity stress fractures in athletes: clinical features of 44 cases. Clin J Sports Med 9:199–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van der Ende KI, McIntosh AL, Adams JE et al (2011) Osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum: a review of the literature and a distal ulnar portal. Arthroscopy 27:122–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Van der Lugt JC, Rozing PM (2004) Systematic review of primary total elbow prostheses used for the rheumatoid elbow. Clin Rheumatol 23:291–298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Van der Wall H, Frater CJ, Magee MA et al (1999a) A novel view for the scintigraphic assessment of the elbow. Nucl Med Commun 20:1059–1065CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Van der Wall H, McLaughlin A, Bruce W et al (1999b) Scintigraphic patterns of injury in amateur weight lifters. Clin Nucl Med 24:915–920CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Van der Wall H, Story G, Frater C et al (2001) Importance of positioning and technical factors in anatomic localization of sporting injuries in scintigraphic imaging. Sem Nucl Med 31:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Voloshin I, Schippert DW, Kakar S et al (2011) Complications of total elbow replacement: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:158–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Woodward AH, Bianco AJ (1975) Osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res 110:35–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhuang H, Yang H et al (2007) Critical role of 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the management of patients with arthroplasty. Radiol Clin North Am 45:711–718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular ImagingUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations