Skip to main content

Property Directed Polyhedral Abstraction

  • Conference paper
Book cover Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation (VMCAI 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8931))

Abstract

This paper combines the benefits of Polyhedral Abstract Interpretation (poly-AI) with the flexibility of Property Directed Reachability (PDR) algorithms for computing safe inductive convex polyhedral invariants. We develop two algorithms that integrate Poly-AI with PDR and show their benefits on a prototype in Z3 using a preliminary evaluation. The algorithms mimic traditional forward Kleene and a chaotic backward iterations, respectively. Our main contribution is showing how to replace expensive convex hull and quantifier elimination computations, a major bottleneck in poly-AI, with demand-driven property-directed algorithms based on interpolation and model-based projection. Our approach integrates seamlessly within the framework of PDR adapted to Linear Real Arithmetic, and allows to dynamically decide between computing convex and non-convex invariants as directed by the property.

This material is based upon work funded and supported by the Department of Defense under Contract No. FA8721-05-C-0003 with Carnegie Mellon University for the operation of the Software Engineering Institute, a federally funded research and development center. This material has been approved for public release and unlimited distribution. DM-0001643.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albarghouthi, A., Gurfinkel, A., Chechik, M.: Craig Interpretation. In: Miné, A., Schmidt, D. (eds.) SAS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7460, pp. 300–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Albarghouthi, A., McMillan, K.L.: Beautiful interpolants. In: Sharygina, Veith (eds.) [27], pp. 313–329

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bagnara, R., Hill, P.M., Zaffanella, E.: The parma polyhedra library: Toward a complete set of numerical abstractions for the analysis and verification of hardware and software systems. CoRR, abs/cs/0612085 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bagnara, R., Hill, P.M., Zaffanella, E.: Widening operators for powerset domains. STTT 9(3-4), 413–414 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benoy, F., King, A., Mesnard, F.: Computing Convex Hulls with a Linear Solver. TPLP 5(1-2), 259–271 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Biere, A., Bloem, R. (eds.): CAV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8559. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Birgmeier, J., Bradley, A.R., Weissenbacher, G.: Counterexample to induction-guided abstraction-refinement (CTIGAR). In: Biere, Bloem (eds.) [6], pp. 831–848

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bradley, A.R.: SAT-Based Model Checking without Unrolling. In: Jhala, R., Schmidt, D. (eds.) VMCAI 2011. LNCS, vol. 6538, pp. 70–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Cimatti, A., Griggio, A.: Software Model Checking via IC3. In: Madhusudan, P., Seshia, S.A. (eds.) CAV 2012. LNCS, vol. 7358, pp. 277–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Cimatti, A., Griggio, A., Mover, S., Tonetta, S.: IC3 Modulo Theories via Implicit Predicate Abstraction. In: Ábrahám, E., Havelund, K. (eds.) TACAS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8413, pp. 46–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cimatti, A., Griggio, A., Sebastiani, R.: Efficient Generation of Craig Interpolants in Satisfiability Modulo Theories. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 12(1), 7 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Abstract Interpretation Frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 2(4), 511–547 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Cousot, P., Halbwachs, N.: Automatic discovery of linear restraints among variables of a program. In: Aho, A.V., Zilles, S.N., Szymanski, T.G. (eds.) POPL, pp. 84–96. ACM Press (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Moura, L., Jovanović, D.: A Model-Constructing Satisfiability Calculus. In: Giacobazzi, R., Berdine, J., Mastroeni, I. (eds.) VMCAI 2013. LNCS, vol. 7737, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Grebenshchikov, S., Lopes, N.P., Popeea, C., Rybalchenko, A.: Synthesizing software verifiers from proof rules. In: PLDI (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gulavani, B.S., Chakraborty, S., Nori, A.V., Rajamani, S.K.: Refining abstract interpretations. Inf. Process. Lett. 110(16), 666–671 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Gurfinkel, A., Chaki, S.: Boxes: A Symbolic Abstract Domain of Boxes. In: Cousot, R., Martel, M. (eds.) SAS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6337, pp. 287–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Halbwachs, N.: Détermination automatique de relations linéaires vérifiées par les variables d’un programme. PhD thesis, Grenoble (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hoder, K., Bjørner, N.: Generalized Property Directed Reachability. In: Cimatti, A., Sebastiani, R. (eds.) SAT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7317, pp. 157–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Kindermann, R., Junttila, T., Niemelä, I.: SMT-Based Induction Methods for Timed Systems. In: Jurdziński, M., Ničković, D. (eds.) FORMATS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7595, pp. 171–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Komuravelli, A., Gurfinkel, A., Chaki, S.: SMT-Based Model Checking for Recursive Programs. In: Biere, Bloem (eds.) [6], pp. 17–34

    Google Scholar 

  22. Komuravelli, A., Gurfinkel, A., Chaki, S., Clarke, E.M.: Automatic Abstraction in SMT-Based Unbounded Software Model Checking. In: Sharygina, Veith (eds.) [27], pp. 846–862

    Google Scholar 

  23. Korovin, K., Voronkov, A.: Solving Systems of Linear Inequalities by Bound Propagation. In: Bjørner, N., Sofronie-Stokkermans, V. (eds.) CADE 2011. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 6803, pp. 369–383. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. McMillan, K.L.: Lazy annotation revisited. In: Biere, A., Bloem, R. (eds.) CAV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8559, pp. 243–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Rival, X., Mauborgne, L.: The trace partitioning abstract domain. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 29(5) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rümmer, P., Hojjat, H., Kuncak, V.: Disjunctive interpolants for horn-clause verification. In: Sharygina, N., Veith, H. (eds.) CAV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8044, pp. 347–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharygina, N., Veith, H. (eds.): CAV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8044. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bjørner, N., Gurfinkel, A. (2015). Property Directed Polyhedral Abstraction. In: D’Souza, D., Lal, A., Larsen, K.G. (eds) Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation. VMCAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8931. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46081-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46081-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46080-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46081-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics