Communication Roles in Public Events

A Case Study on Twitter Communication
  • Milad Mirbabaie
  • Christian Ehnis
  • Stefan Stieglitz
  • Deborah Bunker
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 446)

Abstract

Whilst many studies have looked at the characteristics of effective communications via social media platforms, their use during public events for people to communicate and organize is still relatively uncharted. We have even less understanding of the roles that public event participants play in their use of social media, and this study seeks to address this gap in our knowledge. We analyse the Twitter data related to the 1st May 2014 event (Labour Day) in Germany to identify participant roles in this event, and the impact their tweets had on other participants. From this analysis we draw some tentative conclusions about participant roles in public events and their impact and highlight areas for further investigation.

Keywords

social media analytics Twitter public events emergency service agencies (ESA) social network analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stieglitz, S., Dang-Xuan, L., Bruns, A., Neuberger, C.: Social Media Analytics: An Interdisciplinary Approach and Its Implications for Information Systems. Business and Information Systems Engineering 6(2), 89–96 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ehnis, C., Bunker, D.: The Impact of Disaster Typology on Social Media Use by Emergency Services Agencies: The Case of the Boston Marathon Bombing. In: Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Melbourne, Australia (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stieglitz, S., Krüger, N.: Analysis of Sentiments in Corporate Twitter Communication – A Case Study on an Issue of Toyota. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, Australia (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aoun, C., Vatanasakdakul, S., Bunker, D.: From Cloud to Green: E-Collaboration for Environmental Conservation. In: Chen, J., Dou, W., Liu, J., Yang, L.T., Ma, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing (DASC 2011), including the 1st International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing (CGC 2011), pp. 705–712. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bunker, D.: Serendipity in Disaster and Complex Scenarios. In: Makri, S., Toms, E.G., McCay-Peet, L., Blandford, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Encouraging Serendipity in Interactive Systems, 13th IFIP TC13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 7–10. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sydney Alliance: Half a Million Sydneysiders to Create Change and Opportunity and Improve the City (2011) (press release), http://www.sydneyalliance.org.au/news/2011/09/14/sydney-alliance-the-way-to-have-your-say/
  7. 7.
    Ehnis, C., Bunker, D.: Social Media in Disaster Response: Queensland Police Service – Public Engagement During the 2011 Floods. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Geelong, Australia (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campbell, J.: Local Knowledge Needed in Grantham. The Chronicle (April 28, 2011), http://www.thechronicle.com.au/story/2011/04/28/flood-survivor-martin-warburton-grantham-flood/
  9. 9.
    Bunker, D., Ehnis, C., Seltsikas, P., Levine, L.: Crisis Management and Social Media: Assuring Effective Information Governance for Long Term Social Sustainability. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST 2013), Boston, United States, pp. 246–251. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The Guardian: Reading the Riots: Investigating England’s Summer of Disorder (December 14, 2011), http://www.theguardian.com/uk/interactive/2011/dec/14/reading-the-riots-investigating-england-s-summer-of-disorder-full-report
  11. 11.
    Payne, S., Quilty-Harper, C.: London Riots: Incidents and Suspects Mapped in the UK. The Telegraph (August 9, 2011), http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8689355/London-riots-all-incidents-mapped-in-London-and-around-the-UK.html
  12. 12.
    Halliday, J.: Facebook and Twitter to Oppose Calls for Social Media Blocks during Riots. The Guardian (August 24, 2011), http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/aug/24/uk-riots-facebook-twitter-blackberry
  13. 13.
    Barley, S.R.: The Alignment of Technology and Structure through Roles and Networks. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1), 61–103 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nadel, S.F.: A Theory of Social Structure. Cohen and West, London (1957)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spiegel Online: Demonstrationen zum 1. Mai: Bürger feiern, Gewerkschafter mahnen, Demonstranten stören die NPD. Der Spiegel (May 1, 2014), http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/erster-mai-zusammenstoesse-bei-gegendemos-gegen-npd-a-967151.html
  16. 16.
    Berliner Morgenpost: Polizei setzt Wasserwerfer gegen Demonstranten ein. Berliner Morgenpost (May 1, 2014), http://www.morgenpost.de/nachrichten/article127526047/Polizei-setzt-Wasserwerfer-gegen-Demonstranten-ein.html
  17. 17.
    Hasselmann, J.: Polizei “zufrieden und glücklich“ nach Großeinsatz. Der Tagesspiegel (May 2, 2014), http://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/1-mai-in-berlin-polizei-zufrieden-und-gluecklich-nach-grosseinsatz/9833138.html%2016.07.2014
  18. 18.
    Statisticbrain: Twitter statistics, http://www.statisticbrain.com/twitter-statistics/

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milad Mirbabaie
    • 1
  • Christian Ehnis
    • 2
  • Stefan Stieglitz
    • 1
  • Deborah Bunker
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MuensterMuensterGermany
  2. 2.University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations