Advertisement

Hong Kong People Speak: Rupert Chan and Twelfth Night

  • Shelby Kar-yan Chan
Part of the New Frontiers in Translation Studies book series (NFTS)

Abstract

In 1991, Rupert Chan 陳鈞潤 (Chen Junrun ) wrote a book entitled 港人自講 (Gangren zi jiang). In it he discusses various aspects of the Cantonese spoken in Hong Kong, for which he coins the term 香港話 (Xianggang hua [Hongkong-speak]), as opposed to the Cantonese (廣府話 Guangfu hua) which originated and is spoken in Guangzhou 廣州, China. The book is an anthology of various loosely thrown together newspaper columns. Throughout its 30-some short chapters, the book conveys a sense of pride in the humour, receptiveness, flexibility and creativity of Hongkong-speak. The book title, very close to self-assertion and self-proclamation, suggests the cultural identity of people in the territory. Firstly, it is an interesting and witty pun. It can be translated as “Hong Kong people speak to themselves” or “Hong Kong people speak for themselves”. The title affirms the distinct entity of the people and their language. It also suggests a shared membership based on the language spoken by the people in the territory. In other words, Hongkong-speak is the language by which Hong Kong people communicate among themselves, as much as it is the language they use to communicate themselves to the rest of the world. Secondly, in Cantonese 港人自講 is a homophone of 港人治港 (Gangren zhi gang [Hong Kong people govern Hong Kong]. In Cantonese, both phrases are pronounced gong 2 -yan 4 ji 6 gong 2 ). The latter was the basis of the constitution of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region imposed by Beijing. Through this title, Chan attempts to relate the autonomy of Hongkong-speak to the autonomy of the territory. Chan’s writing may be tongue-in-cheek, and it is intended to achieve rhetorical rather than political effect, yet his association makes sense from a linguistic point of view. Language is tied up with identity, especially in the case of Hong Kong (Scollon 1998: 277), in that individual speakers express their choice of identity by their choice of language and by the degree to which they focus their speech on a given variety (Pennington 1998: 9). Through such “acts of identification”—or what Le Page and Tabouret-Keller (1995) term an “act of identity”—speakers signal their degree of affiliation with one sociocultural group or another, or they create new identities and affiliations which blend the attributes of existing groups.

Keywords

Tang Dynasty Local Audience Hybrid Language Theatre Translation Newspaper Column 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bassnett, Susan, and André Lefevere (eds.). 1998. Constructing cultures: Essays on literary translation (Topics in translation). Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  2. Belsey, Catherine. 1985. Disrupting sexual difference: Meaning and gender in the comedies. In Alternative Shakespeares, ed. John Drakakis, 166–190. London/New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
  3. Brisset, Annie. 1990/1996. A sociocritique of translation: Theatre and alterity in Quebec, 1968–1988. Trans. Rosalind Gill and Roger Gannon. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, Brian Hok-shing. 2007. Hybrid language and hybrid identity? The case of Cantonese-English code-switching in Hong Kong. In East–west identities: Globalization, localization, and hybridization, ed. Chan Kwok-bun, Jan W. Walls, and David Hayward, 189–202. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  5. Chan, Rupert 陳鈞潤. 1988. Nü da bu zhongliu 女大不中留 [Grown-up daughter are not to be kept at home]. Hong Kong: Boyi.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, Rupert 陳鈞潤. 1991. Gangren zi jiang 港人自講 [Hongkongers-speak]. Hong Kong: Breakthrough.Google Scholar
  7. Chan, Rupert 陳鈞潤. 1992a. Wei Xianggang guanzhong fanyi xiju 為香港觀眾翻譯戲劇 [Translating drama for the Hong Kong audience]. In Xianggang huaju lunwenji 香港話劇論文集 [Collection of essays on Hong Kong spoken drama], ed. Gilbert C. F. Fong 方梓勳 and Hardy Tsoi 蔡錫昌, 209–216. Hong Kong: Zhongtian zhizhuo.Google Scholar
  8. Chan, Rupert 陳鈞潤. 1992b. Cong Di shi’er ye dao Yuanxiao 從《第十二夜》到《元宵》[From Twelfth Night to Lantern Festival]. In Xianggang huaju lunwenji 香港話劇論文集 [Collection of essays on Hong Kong spoken drama], ed. Gilbert C. F. Fong 方梓勳 and Hardy Tsoi 蔡錫昌, 217–220. Hong Kong: Zhongtian zhizhuo.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, Rupert 陳鈞潤. 1997. Interview by Sze-wai Shing 盛思維. Hong Kong, August 1997. In Xianggang huaju fangtanlu 香港話劇訪談錄 [Collection of interviews with theatre practitioners in Hong Kong], ed. Gilbert C. F. Fong, 145–153. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Theatre Works, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  10. Chan, Rupert 陳鈞潤. 2000. Zhizu zhe, bin yi le 知足者 , 頻譯樂 (Happy is he who frequently translates). In Wenxue zuopin de fanyi guocheng: Lilun yu shijian 文學作品的翻譯過程 : 理論與實踐 [The translating process of literary works: Theory and practice], ed. Nga-lai Cheng 鄭雅麗, 103–139. Hong Kong: School of Chinese, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  11. Chan, Rupert 陳鈞潤. 2006. Cong Yingguo yizhi dao Dai Zhonghua de Jiating zuonie 從英國移植到大中華的《家庭作孽》[A Small Family’s Business transplanted from Britain to Greater China]. Paper presented at “ 'Tashan zhi shi’ xiju yantao hui” 「他山之石」戲劇研討會 [“Rock on another mountain” drama conference]. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 16–18 August 2006.Google Scholar
  12. Chan, Rupert 陳鈞潤. 2009. Interview by author. Hong Kong, 12 December 2009.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, Guanzhong 陳冠中. 1997. Bantangfan—Meixue biji 半唐番——美學筆記 [Half-Chinese and half-Western—Notes on aesthetics]. Ming Pao 明報 (Hong Kong), 10 October 2004.Google Scholar
  14. Corbett, John. 1999. Written in the language of the Scottish nation: A history of literary translation into Scots. Clevedon/Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  15. Ebrey, Patricia Buckley. 1999. The Cambridge illustrated history of China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Findlay, Bill, and Martin W. Bowman (trans.). 2000. Full moon in summer. London: Nick Hem Books.Google Scholar
  17. Fong, Gilbert C. F. 方梓勳. 1998. Gangdu yu ma ji qita—Yiming yu yishi xingtai 港督與馬及其他──譯名與意識形態 [Hong Kong Governors and others—Translated names and ideologies]. In Waiwen Zhong yi yanjiu yu tantao 外文中譯研究與探討 [Studies on English–Chinese translation], ed. Serena Jin 金聖華, 420–444. Hong Kong: Department of Translation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  18. Gernet, Jacques. 1962. Daily life in China on the eve of the Mongol invasion, 1250–1276. Trans. H. M. Wright. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Howard, Jean E. 1988. Crossdressing, the theatre, and gender in struggle early modern England. Shakespeare quarterly 39: 418–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jameson, Fredric. 2002. The political unconscious: Narrative as a socially symbolic act. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Karsky, Maria Nadia. 2004. ‘Je vous prie de me laisser rire’: Translating laughter in Molière. In Drama translation and theatre practice, ed. Sabine Coelsch-Foisner and Holger Klein, 223–237. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Lai, Sufen Sophia. 1999. From cross-dressing daughter to lady Knight-Errant: The origin and evolution of Chinese women warriors. In Presence and presentation: Women in the Chinese literati tradition, ed. Sherry J. Kou, 77–108. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  23. Le Page, R.B., and A. Tabouret-Keller. 1995. Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, Leo Ou-fan. 1994. On the margins of the Chinese discourse: Some personal thoughts on the cultural meaning of the periphery. In The living tree: The changing meaning of being Chinese today, ed. Tu, Wei-ming. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Li, Daniel C.S. 1998. The plight of the purist. In Language in Hong Kong at century’s end, ed. Martha C. Pennington, 161–189. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lothian, J.M., and T.W. Clark (eds.). 1975. Twelfth Night (The Arden Shakespeare), 2nd ed. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  27. Luke, Kang-Kwong. 1998. Why two languages might be better than one: Motivations of language mixing in Hong Kong. In Language in Hong Kong at century’s end, ed. Martha C. Pennington, 145–159. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  28. McKay, Sandra L., and Sau-ling C. Wong (eds.). 2000. New immigrants in the United States: Readings for second language educators. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Pennington, Martha C. (ed.). 1998. Introduction: Perspectives on language in Hong Kong at century’s end. In Language in Hong Kong at century’s end, 3–40. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Peteghella, Manuela. 2002. Language and politics on stage: Strategies for translating dialect and slang with references to Shaw’s Pygmalion and Bond’s Saved. Translation review 64: 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pierson, Herbert D. 1998. Societal accommodation to English and Putonghua in Cantonese-speaking Hong Kong. In Language in Hong Kong at century’s end, ed. Martha C. Pennington, 91–111. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Schultze, Brigitte. 2007. Problems of cultural transfer and cultural identity: Personal names and titles in drama translation. In Interculturality and the historical study of literary translations, Harald Kittel and Armin Paul Frank, 91–110. Berlin/Beijing: Erich Schmidt Verlag/Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
  33. Scollon, Ron. 1998. Hong Kong language in context: The discourse of Ch’u. In Language in Hong Kong at century’s end, ed. Martha C. Pennington, 277–281. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Shapiro, Michael. 1994. Gender in play on the Shakespearean stage: Boy heroines and female pages. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  35. Simpson, Andrew (ed.). 2007. Hong Kong. In Language & national identity in Asia, 168–185. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. To, Siu-tip 涂小蠂 (ed.). 2005. Chen Junyun gei Yingguo de Jiating zuonie chuanshang Shenzhen de xifu 陳鈞潤給英國的《家庭作孽》穿上深圳的戲服 [Rupert Chan dresses Britain’s A Small Family’s Business in Shenzhen costume]. In Xiyan ji 戲言集 [Collection of drama essays]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Repertory Theatre Company.Google Scholar
  37. Watts, R.J. 1999. The ideology of dialect in Switzerland. In Language ideological debates, ed. J. Blommaert, 67–104. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
  38. Wilkinson, Jane. 2005. Staging ‘Swissness’: Inter- and intracultural theatre translation. Language and intercultural communication 5(1): 72–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14708470508668884. Accessed 25 June 2010.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shelby Kar-yan Chan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of TranslationHang Seng Management CollegeHong KongHong Kong SAR

Personalised recommendations