Abstract
In mid-2013, the House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology, of the UK Parliament, held an inquiry into Women in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths). The inquiry sought to address the “leaky pipeline”—the continuous loss of women at consecutive career stages within STEM, where these gradual losses reduce the numbers of women retained in STEM further education and work. The Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology (IMarEST) consulted its 15,000 members (of which only 3 % are female) to determine whether the problems facing women were exacerbated by the additional challenges of working within the marine sector and to examine how it could develop proactive solutions for addressing the issue. This paper delves into some of the results from the consultation, both anecdotal and evidence-based, and debates the issues. These include:
-
(1)
That the “leaky pipeline” is not the result of women choosing not to progress their careers and those who wish to succeed will do so. However, supportive employers who demonstrate willingness to offer women opportunities to progress, are a must.
-
(2)
That many of the issues apply to women across all careers and are related to work-life balance and the consequences of having a family. However, there are specificities in a career in marine STEM that make it harder for women to succeed compared to other careers and, in particular, STEM careers. These include disproportionately low numbers of women in all roles and the additional challenges of working offshore or on board ships.
-
(3)
Female role models in STEM are vital, but these role models must be carefully selected.
There is a perception that many of the role models in marine STEM have got to high level positions by compromising; by not having a family or by becoming “one of the boys”, having the opposite of the desired effect.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adamo, S. A. (2013). Attrition of women in the biological sciences: Workload, motherhood, and other explanations revisited. BioScience, 63(1), 43–48.
Bell-Burnell, J. (2012). Still more to be achieved. The Journal of the Foundation for Science and Technology, 20(8), 19–20.
Botcherby, S., & Buckner, L. (2012). Women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: From classroom to boardroom: UK Statistics 2012. Resource document. WISE. http://www.wisecampaign.org.uk/files/useruploads/files/wise_stats_document_final.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2012). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 108(8), 3157–3162.
Cranfield University. (2013). The FTSE female index. http://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/ftse. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.
Department for Business Innovation and Skills. (2012). UK marine industries strategic framework. http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/business-sectors/docs/10-647-marine-industries-strategic-framework. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.
Goulden, M., Mason, M. A., & Frasch, K. (2011). Keeping women in the science pipeline. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 638, 141–162.
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. (2013). Educating tomorrow’s engineers: The impact of Government reforms on 14–19 education: Seventh report of Session 2012–13. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmsctech/665/665.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. (2014). Women in scientific careers: Sixth report. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmsctech/701/70102.htm. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.
IMarEST. (2013). Written evidence submitted to the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee on women in STEM. http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/science-and-technology-committee/women-in-stem-careers/written/1768.html. Accessed 1 Jun 2014.
IMarEST, & MatchTech. (2014). Mitigating the skills gap in the maritime and offshore oil & gas market. http://www.imarest.org/policy-news/representing-members/skills-gap/375-mitigating-the-skills-gap-in-the-maritime-and-offshore-oil-a-gas-market/file. Accessed 1 Jun 2014.
ITF. (2014). Woman seafarers. http://www.itfseafarers.org/ITI-women-seafarers.cfm. Accessed 1 Jun 2014.
National Science Foundation. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/digest/. Accessed 1 Jun 2014.
Office of National Statistics. (2012). Annual survey of hours and earnings, 2012 provisional results. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/ashe/annual-survey-of-hours-and-earnings/2012-provisional-results/stb-ashe-statistical-bulletin-2012.html. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.
Oxford Economics. (2012). The economic impact of the UK shipping industry. http://www.ukchamberofshipping.com/media/filer/2013/11/27/economic_impact_of_uk_ports_sector_-_feb_2013_including_regional.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.
Professional Associations Research Network’s. (2013). A third of professional bodies’ leaders are women. http://www.parnglobal.com/a-third-of-professional-bodies-leaders-are-women. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.
Royal Academy of Engineering. (2009). Inspiring women engineers. http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/list/reports/Inspiring_Women_Engineers.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.
Royal Society of Edinburgh. (2012). Tapping all our talents: Women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: A strategy for Scotland. http://www.royalsoced.org.uk/cms/files/advice-papers/inquiry/women_in_stem/tapping_talents.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.
The Crown Estate. (2008). Socio-economic indicators of marine-related activities in the UK economy. http://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/media/5774/socio_economic_uk_marine.pdf. Accessed 18 Aug 2014.
UK Chamber of Shipping. (2012). Annual review. http://www.ukchamberofshipping.com/information/publications-and-briefings/annual-review/. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.
UK Government. (2013). The business case for equality and diversity – A survey of the academic literature. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-business-case-for-equality-and-diversity-a-survey-of-the-academic-literature. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.
UK NEST. (2013). The naval engineering workforce: A UK NEST review. https://www.uknest.org/node/379. Accessed 16 Feb 2014.
US Department of Labor. (2002a). Highlights of women’s earnings in 2001. http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpswom2001.pdf. Accessed 1 Jun 2014.
US Department of Labor. (2002b). Women in high-tech jobs. http://www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/hitech02.htm. Accessed 1 Apr 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mackenzie, B. (2015). The “Leaky Pipeline”: Examining and Addressing the Loss of Women at Consecutive Career Stages in Marine Engineering, Science and Technology. In: Kitada, M., Williams, E., Froholdt, L. (eds) Maritime Women: Global Leadership. WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45385-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45385-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45384-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45385-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)