Business Rules, Constraints and Simulation for Enterprise Governance

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 191)


This paper aims to describe the main challenges to enterprise governance and proposes a hybrid approach based on business rules, constraints modelling and simulation. This approach can help to identify the high-level governance requirements and relate strategic, operational and IT governance aspects together. One of the important values of this approach is aligning governance knowledge in order to improve rules tracking between context and governance requirements thus catering for early identification of conflicts and other risk issues.


Enterprise governance Rule based modelling Semantic of business vocabulary and business rules System dynamic modelling Hybrid enterprise rule approach 


  1. 1.
    Jarke, M., Loucopoulos, P., Lyytinen, K., Mylopoulos, J., Robinson, W.: The brave new world of design requirements. Inf. Syst. 36(7), 992–1008 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baxter, G., Sommerville, I.: Socio-technical systems: from design methods to systems engineering. Interact. Comput. 23(1), 4–17 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morabito, J., Sack, I., Bhate, A.: Organization Modeling: Innovative Architectures for the 21st Century. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jurisica, J., Mylopoulos, J., Yu, E.: Ontologies for knowledge management: an information systems perspective. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 6(4), 380–401 (2004). doi: 10.1007/s10115-003-0135-4. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ISACA: The Risk IT Framework (2009).
  6. 6.
    Kildow, B.A.: A supply chain management guide to business continuity. AMACOM Division of American Management Association (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA), “The CIMA Strategic Scorecard” (2005).
  8. 8.
    Codd, E.F.: Derivability, redundancy, and consistency of relations stored in large data banks. Research Report RJ599, IBM Corporation, San Jose, CA, USA, 19 August 1969Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linehan, M.: Ontologies and rules in business models. In: VORTE 2007, The 3rd International Workshop on Vocabularies, Ontologies and Rules for the Enterprise, Annapolis, MD (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vanthienen, J., Wets, G.: Integration of the decision table formalism with a relational database environment. Inf. Syst. 20(7), 595–616 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vanthienen, J., Mues, C., Wets, G., Delaere, K.: A tool-supported approach to inter-tabular verification. Expert Syst. Appl. 15(3–4), 277–285 (1998). doi: 10.1016/S0957-4174(98)00047-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wan-Kadir, W.M.N., Loucopoulos, P.: Relating evolving business rules to software design. J. Syst. Architect. 50(7), 367–382 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kardasis, P., Loucopoulos, P.: Expressing and organising business rules. Inf. Softw. Technol. 46(11), 701–718 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cabot, J., Pau, R., Raventós, R.: From UML/OCL to SBVR specifications: a challenging transformation. Inf. Syst. 35(4), 417–440 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosca, D., Greenspan, S., Wild, C.: Enterprise modeling and decision-support for automating the business rules lifecycle. Autom. Softw. Eng. 9(4), 361–404 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goedertier, S., Haesen, R., Vanthienen, J.: EM-BrA2CE v0.1: a vocabulary and execution model for declarative business process modeling, SSRN 1086027 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Muehlen, Z.M., Indulska, M.: Modeling languages for business processes and business rules: a representational analysis. Inf. Syst. 35(4), 379–390 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Contract Specification Language, D.2.5.4. Israel Aerospace Industry (2008).
  19. 19.
    Sterman, J.G.: Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bianchi, C.: Improving performance and fostering accountability in the public sector through system dynamics modelling: from an ‘external’ to an ‘internal’ perspective. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 27(4), 361–384 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barnabè, F.: A “system dynamics-based Balanced Scorecard” to support strategic decision making: Insights from a case study. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 60(5), 446–473 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bianchi, C., Winch, G., Cosenz, F.: Sustainable strategies for small companies competing against multinational giants. In: Acere-Diana Conference, Perth (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ghadge, A., Dani, S., Chester, M., Kalawsky, R.: A systems approach for modelling supply chain risks. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 18(5), 523–538 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goh, Y.M., Love, P.E.: Methodological application of system dynamics for evaluating traffic safety policy. Saf. Sci. 50(7), 1594–1605 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saleh, M., Oliva, R., Kampmann, C.E., Davidsen, P.I.: A comprehensive analytical approach for policy analysis of system dynamics models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 203(3), 673–683 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bianchi, C., Bivona, E., Cognata, A., Ferrara, P., Landi, T., Ricci, P.: Applying system dynamics to foster organizational change, accountability and performance in the public sector: a case-based Italian perspective. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 27(4), 395–442 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Beis, D.A., Loucopoulos, P., Zografos, K.G.: PLATO helps Athens win gold: olympic games knowledge modelling for organizational change and resource management. Interfaces 36(1), 26–42 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Loucopoulos, P., Prekas, N.: A framework for requirements engineering using system dynamics. In: 21st International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, New York City (2003)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Karpovic, J., Nemuraite, L.: Transforming SBVR business semantics into Web ontology language OWL2: main concepts. In: Information Technologies, 27–29 April 2011, pp. 231–238 (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Malik, N.: Enterprise Business Motivation Model (EBMM), V. 4 (2011).
  31. 31.
    OMG: Semantic of business vocabulary and business rules (SBVR) 1.0. (2008). Retrieved from Object Management Group
  32. 32.
    Fayoumi, A., Yang, L.: SBVR: knowledge definition, vocabulary management and rules integration. Int. J. E-Bus. Dev. (IJED) (2012). ISSN-P: 2225-7411, ISSN-E: 2226-7336Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Horizon Digital EconomyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Harokopio University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations