Advertisement

Megatrend Global Populism? From South America to the Occupy Movement

  • Alejandro Pelfini
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the continuities or the “elective affinities” between the recent populist wave (or populist come back) in South America and the current Occupy Movement in order to trace the contours of an original populism at a global scale. The article starts with a brief definition of populism, continues with a brief evaluation of the recent return of populism in South America finishing with the analysis of the main connections with the current Occupy Movement: the experience of a crisis; the claims for more democracy and the exploration of a postneoliberal political economy. In societies with obscene levels of inequality such as what exists in many South American countries, populism does not seem to be a heresy or a pathology, but a rational alternative to solve problems rooted in a failed nation building processes. Increasing indignation as a generalize perception of non-experienced levels of inequality in the concentration of resources and power at the global level is at the basis of one can call a populist moment. It has to be discussed, if this populist moment also contains an original populist movement with global contours inside.

Keywords

Political Regime Populist Movement South American Country Global Economic Crisis Global Civil Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arditi, Benjamín. 2007. Politics on the edges of liberalism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berlin, Isaiah. 1978. Russian thinkers (co-edited with Aileen Kelly). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  3. Canovan, Margaret. 1999. Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies 47(1): 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canovan, Margaret. 2002. Taking politics to the people: Populism as the ideology of democracy. In Democracies and the populist challenge, ed. Yves Mény and Yves Surel, 25–44. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky, Noam. 2012. Occupy. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  6. Collier, Ruth Berind, and David Collier. 1991. Shaping the political arena. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Conniff, Michael. 1999. Populism in Latin America. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  8. Castañeda, Jorge. 1995. La utopía desarmada. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
  9. Drake, Paul. 1982. Conclusion: Requiem for populism? In Latin American populism in comparative perspective, ed. Michael Conniff. Albuquerque: New Mexico University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Féliz, Mariano, and Emiliano López. 2012. Proyecto neodesarrollista en la Argentina ¿Modelo nacional-popular o nueva etapa en el desarrollo capitalista? Buenos Aires: El Colectivo-Herramienta.Google Scholar
  11. Fraser, Nancy. 2007. Transnationalizing the public sphere. On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-westphalian world. Theory, Culture and Society 24(4): 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. García Delgado, Daniel, and Luciano Nosetto (eds.). 2006. El desarrollo en un contexto posneoliberal. Buenos Aires: Ciccus.Google Scholar
  13. Godio, Julio. 2004. The Argentine anomaly: From wealth through collapse to neo-developmentalism. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft 2: 128–146.Google Scholar
  14. Goodwyn, Lawrence. 1978. The populist moment: A short history of the Agrarian 378 Revolt in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Groppo, Alejandro. 2009. Los dos príncipes: Juan D Perón y Getulio Vargas. Villa María (Córdoba): Eduvim.Google Scholar
  16. Hardt, Michael, and Toni Negri. 2011. The fight for “real democracy” at the heart of occupy wall street. Foreign Affairs (Snapshot, 11 Oct 2011).Google Scholar
  17. Hermet, Guy. 2001. Les Populism dans le Monde. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  18. Hessel, Stephan. 2010. Indignez-vous. Paris: Indigene.Google Scholar
  19. Ianni, Octávio. 1972. A formação do Estado populista na América Latina. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.Google Scholar
  20. Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. Lafer, Celso. 2002. A identidade internacional do Brasil e a politica externa brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Perspectiva.Google Scholar
  22. Levitsky, Steve, and Kenneth Roberts (eds.). 2011. The resurgence of Latin American left. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Levitsky, Steve, and L. Way. 2010. Competitive authoritarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mazzoleni, Gianpietro, Gianpietro Mazzoleni, Julianne Stewart, and Bruce Horsfield (eds.). 2003. The media and neo-populism: A contemporary comparative analysis. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  25. McMath, Robert. 1993. American populism: A social history 1877–1898. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
  26. Melucci, Alberto. 1989. Nomads of the present. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  27. Merkel, Wolfgang, Hans-Jürgen Puhle, and Aurel Croissant (Comps.). 2006. Defekte Demokratien. Bd.2, Defekte Demokratien in Osteuropa, Ostasien und Lateinamerika. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  28. Mörtenböck, Peter, and Helge Mooshammer. 2012. Occupy. Räume des Protests. Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mudde, Cas. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39(3): 541–563.Google Scholar
  30. Mudde, Cas. 2010. The populist radical right: A pathological normalcy. West European Politics 33(6): 1167–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nederveen Pieterse, Jan. 2012. Twenty-first century globalization: A new development era. Forum for Development Studies 2012: 1–19.Google Scholar
  32. Offe, Claus, and Helmut Wiesenthal. 1980. Two logics of collective action: Theoretical notes on social class and organizational form. Political Power and Social Theory 1: 67–115.Google Scholar
  33. Pelfini, Alejandro. 2007. Entre el temor al populismo y el entusiasmo autonomista. La reconfiguración de la ciudadanía en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad 212: 22–34.Google Scholar
  34. Pelfini, Alejandro. 2011. Global and national political elites in South America: Limited transnationalization processes and the persistence of inequality. In Globalization and inequality in emerging societies, ed. Boike Rehbein. Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan.Google Scholar
  35. Pelfini, Alejandro, and García Delgado Daniel. 2009. Die Rekonfiguration der Globalisierung aus den Schwellenländern. Ästhetik & Kommunikation 147(40): 19–24. Winter 2009/2010.Google Scholar
  36. Priester, Karin. 2008. Populismus: Historische und aktuelle Erscheinungsformen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  37. Roberts, Kenneth. 1995. Neoliberalism and the transformation of populism in Latin America. World Politics 48(October): 82–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schlechter, Danny. 2012. Occupy: Dissecting occupy wall street. New York: Cosimo Books.Google Scholar
  39. Souza Santos, Boaventura de. 2013, June 20. Brasil, O preço do progresso. Público.Google Scholar
  40. Taguieff, Pierre-André. 2007. L’Illusion populiste. Essais sur les démagogies de l’âge démocratique. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  41. Tarrow, Sidney. 2011. Why occupy wall street is not the tea party of the left? Foreign Affairs (Snapshot, 10 Oct 2011).Google Scholar
  42. Vilas, Carlos. 1994. Estudio preliminar. El populismo o la democratización fundamental de America Latina. In ders. (ed.): La democratización fundamental. El populismo en America Latina, 11–149. Mexico: Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes.Google Scholar
  43. Vilas, Carlos. 2011. Democracias conflictivas o el alegado resurgimiento populista en la política sudamericana. Cuadernos Americanos, Año XXV, 1(135): 31–56.Google Scholar
  44. Weffort, Francisco. 1968. O Populismo na Política Brasileira. In Brasil: Tempos Modernos, ed. Celso Furtado, 49–75. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology DepartmentUniversidad Alberto HurtadoSantiago de ChileChile

Personalised recommendations