Manufacturing Reporting Knowledge Representation: A Case Study at STMicroelectronics

Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 438)


This paper addresses the problem of manufacturing Reporting knowledge representation in manufacturing companies. An approach to characterize these knowledge is proposed. The solution is applied to the Reporting process at STMicroelectronics for capitalizing knowledge in the Wiki of the company and responding to users’ needs. In such an approach, the user participates throughout the knowledge representation definition process, even in choosing knowledge characteristics to represent it. For that aim, three dimensions are taken into consideration: the know What, the know Why and the know How.


Knowledge Representation Business Intelligence Reporting Process Knowledge Capitalization Simple User 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Bera, P.: Knowledge requirements analysis: A case study. PhD thesis, The University of British Columbia (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blaise, J.C., Lhoste, P., Ciccotelli, J.: Formalisation of normative knowledge for safe design. Safety Science, 241–261 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bombardier, V., Lhoste, P., Mazaud, C.: Expert knowledge modeling and expert knowledge integration for defect identification by fuzzy linguistic rules. traitement du signal 21 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brichni, M., Dupuy, S., Gzara, L., Mandran, N., Rozier, D.: A wiki for knowledge sharing: A user-centered evaluation approach. UnpublishedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frey, A.G.: Quality of Human-Computer Interaction: Self-Explanatory User Interfaces by Model-Driven Engineering. PhD thesis, Laboratoire d’Informatique de Grenoble (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horkoff, J., Borgida, A., Mylopoulos, J., Barone, D., Jiang, L., Yu, E., Amyot, D.: Making data meaningful: The business intelligence model and its formal semantics in description logics. In: ODBASE, pp. 700–717 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, J., Lai, K.Y.: Whats in design rationale? Human-Computer Interaction, 251–280 (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lillehagen, F., Krogstie, J.: Active knowledge modeling of enterprises. ACM Computing classification (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malvache, P., Prieur, P.: Mastering corporate experience with the rex method. ISMICK 93 (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maniatis, A.S.: Olap presentation modeling with uml and xml. In: Proceedings of the 1st Balkan Conference in Informatics (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marthinusen, I.: The active knowledge modeling approach-to configurable product and process design. Master’s thesis, Norwegian university of science and technology (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mathieu, S.: Knowledge management appliqué à la rénovation d’une unit de production de produits biologiques. PhD thesis, Faculté de pharmacie de Grenoble (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matta, N., Ermine, J.L., Aubertin, G., Yves Trivin, J.: How to capitalize knowledge with the mask method? In: IJCAI Workshop, pp. 1–13 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Page, M., Gensel, J., Capponi, C., Bruley, C., Genoud, P., Ziebelin, D.: Representation de connaissances au moyen de classes et d’associations. LMO (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schreiber, G.: Knowledge enineering and management. MIT Press (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Univ. Grenoble Alpes, G-SCOPGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.CNRS, G-SCOPGrenobleFrance
  3. 3.Laboratoire d’Informatique de GrenobleFrance
  4. 4.STMicroelectronicsSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations