Abstract
Measuring the value of a product before launching its production is a way to assure its good sale. The present study proposes a methodology to evaluate the intrinsic value of an habitation. The value is measured in terms of sustainability and customization.
The methodology is composed of a first step of determination of value drivers, an evaluation step, an aggregation step and finally recommendation. Step.
The methodology is applied on a real case: the CAP 44 housing project in Nantes, France.
Keywords
References
Adamcsek, E.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Generalizations. Master thesis, Eötvös Lorand University (2008)
Amérigo, M., Aragonés, J.I.: A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology 17, 47–57 (1997)
Barlow, J., Childerhouse, P., Gann, D., Hong-Minh, S., Naim, M., Ozaki, R.: Choice and delivery in housebuilding: lessons from Japan for UK housebuilders. Building Research & Information 31(2), 134–145 (2003)
Blecker, T., Abdelkafi, N., Kaluza, B., Friedrich, G.: Controlling variety-induced complexity in mass customisation: a key metrics-based approach. International Journal of Mass Customisation 1(2/3), 272–298 (2006)
Enquête Century21, Le logement idéal des français (2010-2011), http://photosv5.century21.fr/pdf/201101_c21_logement_ideal.pdf
Daaboul, J., da Cunha, C., Bernard, A., Laroche, F.: Design for Mass Customization: Product variety vs. Process variety. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 60(1), 169–174 (2011)
Da Silveira, G., Borenstein, D., Fogliatto, F.: Mass customization: literature review and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics 72(1), 1–13 (2001)
Fogliatto, F.S., da Silveira, G.J.C., Borenstein, D.: The mass customization decade: An updated review of the literature. International Journal of Production Economics 138(1), 14–25 (2012)
Gallarza, M.G., Gil Saura, I.: Value dimensions, perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty: an investigation of university students’ travel behaviour. Tourism Management 27(3), 437–452 (2006)
Gilmore, J., Pine, J.: The four faces of mass customization. Harvard Business Review 75, 91–101 (1997)
Martin, M.: Design for variety: a methodology for developing product plateform architectures, Standford university (1999)
Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal Services Sciences 1(1), 83–98 (2008)
Tan, R.R., Promentilla, M.A.B.: A methodology for augmenting sparse pairwise comparison matrices in AHP: applications to energy systems. Clean Techn. Environ. Policy 15(4), 713–719 (2013)
Ueda, K., Takenaka, T., Váncza, J., Monostori, L.: Value creation and decision-making in sustainable societ. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 58(2), 681–700 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chadeneau, A., Dol, E., Martinez, S., da Cunha, C.M. (2014). Evaluation of Sustainable Mass Customized Habitation: The Case of CAP 44. In: Grabot, B., Vallespir, B., Gomes, S., Bouras, A., Kiritsis, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Innovative and Knowledge-Based Production Management in a Global-Local World. APMS 2014. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 439. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44736-9_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44736-9_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44735-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44736-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)