Advertisement

Adjusting the Tests According to the Perception of Greek Students Who Are Taught Russian Motion Verbs via Distance Learning

  • Oksana Kalita
  • Georgios Pavlidis
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 437)

Abstract

Nowadays, the quantity of digital data is so large that its analysis and evaluation can only be performed through (semi-) automatic methods. In a distance learning context, such problems arise for the teacher who needs to personalize the educational material for specific students. The present study focuses on the personalization of the educational material for Greek students learning the Russian language in a distance learning environment. We discovered that it is important for the Intelligent Tutoring System and more specifically for the Intelligent Agents (IA) to have a set of key-characteristics for a proper representation of the states. By having more features an agent has more accurate results whereas useless features are ignored.

Keywords

intelligent tutoring system trained agents intelligent test agent Russian motion verbs Greek students’ preferences 

References

  1. 1.
    Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.J.: Agent Technology. Springer, Berlin (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kay, A.: User Interface: A Personal View. In: The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design, pp. 121–131 (1989)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bentley, T.J.: Managing information: Avoiding Overload. CIMA, London (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leng, J., Lim, C.P., Li, J., Li, D., Jain, L.: A Role-Based Cognitive Architecture for Multi-Agent Teaming. In: Håkansson, A., et al. (eds.) Agent and Multi-agent Technology for Internet and Enterprise Systems. SCI, vol. 289, pp. 229–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franklin, S., Graesser, A.: Is it an Agent, or Just a Program? A Taxonomy for Autonomous. In: Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.J., Müller, J.P. (eds.) ECAI-WS 1996 and ATAL 1996. LNCS, vol. 1193, pp. 21–35. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maes, P.: Agents that Reduce Work and Information Overload. Communications of the ACM 34(7), 30–40 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hanani, U., Shapira, B., Shoval, P.: Information Filtering: Overview of Issues, Research and Systems. In: User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, pp. 203–259 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Palme, J.: Information Filtering, Stockholm (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Juszczyszyn, K., Kazienko, P., Musiał, K.: Personalized Ontology-Based Recommender Systems for Multimedia Objects. In: Håkansson, A., et al. (eds.) Agent and Multi-agent Technology for Internet and Enterprise Systems. SCI, vol. 289, pp. 275–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gascueña, G.M., Fernández-Caballero, A.: An Agent-based Intelligent Tutoring System for Enhancing E-Learning/E-Teaching. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 2(11), 11–24 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Håkansson, A., Hartung, R., Nguyen, N.T.: Agent and Multi-Agent Technology for Internet and Enterprise Systems. Springer, Berlin (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oksana Kalita
    • 1
  • Georgios Pavlidis
    • 2
  1. 1.Peoples’ Friendship UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.University of PatrasPatraGreece

Personalised recommendations