Advertisement

Extending the Kouretes Statechart Editor for Generic Agent Behavior Development

  • Georgios L. Papadimitriou
  • Nikolaos I. Spanoudakis
  • Michail G. Lagoudakis
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 436)

Abstract

The development of high-level behavior for autonomous robots is a time-consuming task even for experts. The Kouretes Statechart Editor (KSE) is a Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE) tool, which allows to easily specify a desired robot behavior as a statechart model utilizing a variety of base robot functionalities (vision, localization, locomotion, motion skills, communication) for the Monas robotic software architecture framework. This paper presents an extension to KSE, which allows defining generic agent behaviors using automatic framework-independent code generation, as long as the underlying framework is written in C++. This way a user can program physical (robots) or software agents that can be executed on any platform using any compatible software framework. This paper demonstrates the transparent use of the extended KSE in the SimSpark 3D soccer simulation and the Wumpus world.

Keywords

agents robotics model-based development CASE 

References

  1. 1.
    Hafner, V., Burkhard, H.D., Mellmann, H., Krause, T., Scheunemann, M., Ritter, C.N., Schütte, P.: Berlin United – Nao Team Humboldt 2013. In: RoboCup 2013 Team Description Papers (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harel, D., Naamad, A.: The Statemate semantics of statecharts. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 5(4), 293–333 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hayes-Roth, B.: A blackboard architecture for control. Artificial Intelligence 26(3), 251–321 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paraschos, A.: Monas: A Flexible Software Architecture for Robotic Agents. Diploma thesis, Department of ECE, Technical University of Crete, Greece (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paraschos, A., Spanoudakis, N.I., Lagoudakis, M.G.: Model-driven behavior specification for robotic teams. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 171–178 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spanoudakis, N.I., Moraitis, P.: Using ASEME methodology for model-driven agent systems development. In: Weyns, D., Gleizes, M.-P. (eds.) AOSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6788, pp. 106–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Topalidou-Kyniazopoulou, A., Spanoudakis, N.I., Lagoudakis, M.G.: A CASE tool for robot behavior development. In: Chen, X., Stone, P., Sucar, L.E., van der Zant, T. (eds.) RoboCup 2012. LNCS, vol. 7500, pp. 225–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R., Kinny, D.: The Gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Autonomous Agents & Multi-Agent Systems 3(3), 285–312 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georgios L. Papadimitriou
    • 1
  • Nikolaos I. Spanoudakis
    • 1
  • Michail G. Lagoudakis
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University of CreteChaniaGreece

Personalised recommendations