Perceptual Strategies Under Constrained Movements on a Zoomable Haptic Mobile Device

  • Mounia Ziat
  • Eric Lecolinet
  • Olivier Gapenne
  • Gerard Mouret
  • Charles Lenay
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8618)

Abstract

This study shows that zooming and pointing strategies are influenced by visual constraints when using a haptic mobile device. Participants were required to point on invisible targets that were only detectable via a tactile feedback. Movements were either constrained or unconstrained. Results revealed that pointing and zooming strategies depended on the order of training. Participants who started their training with unconstrained movements, kept using the same strategies even when constraints have been removed. This suggests that constrained movements allowed participants to explore other strategies that would have not been available and extended their repertoire of exploratory strategies related to the haptic zoom.

Keywords

Mobile devices Constrained movements Haptic zoom Perceptual strategies 

References

  1. 1.
    Baudisch, P., Chu, G.: Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. In: Proceedings of CHI 2009, Boston, MS, 4–9 April 2009, pp. 1–10 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Desmurget, M., Jordan, M., Prablanc, C., Jeannerod, M.: Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies. J. Neurophysiol. 77, 1644–1650 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ernst, M.O., Banks, M.S., Bulthoff, H.H.: Touch can change visual slant perception. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 69–73 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferrel, C., Leien, D., Orliaguet, J.P., Coello, Y.: Pointing movement visually controlled through a video display: adaptation to scale change. Ergonomics 43, 461–473 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Furnas, G., Bederson, B.B.: Space-scale diagrams: understanding multiscale interfaces. In: CHI’95, pp. 234–241. ACM Press (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hayward, V.: A brief taxonomy of tactile illusions and demonstrations that can be done in a hardware store. Brain Res. Bull. 75, 742–752 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holmquist, L.E.: Focus+context visualization with flip zooming and the zoom browser. In: CHI ‘97 Extended Abstracts, pp. 263–264. ACM Press (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lecolinet, E., Mouret, G.: TACTIBALL, TACTIPEN, TACTITAB ou comment “toucher du doigt” les donnees de son ordinateur. In: IHM’05, pp. 227–230 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, G.S., Hannaford, B.: Anisotropies of touch in haptic icon exploration. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, USA. IEEE Press (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lederman, S.J., Klatzky, R.L.: Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cogn. Psychol. 19, 342–368 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Levesque, V., Oram, L., MacLean, K., Cockburn, A., Marchuk, N.D.,. Johnson, D., Colgate, J.E., Peshkin, M.A.: Enhancing physicality in touch interaction with programmable friction. In: CHI’11 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luk, J., Pasquero,J., Little,S., MacLean, K., Levesque, V., Hayward, V.: A role for haptics in mobile interaction: initial design using a handheld tactile display prototype. In: CHI’06 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Messier, J., Kalaska, J.F.: Differential effect of task conditions on errors of direction and extent of reaching movements. Exp. Brain Res. 115, 469–478 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Norman, D.A.: Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Okamoto, S., Yamauchi, T., Konyo, M., Tadokoro, S.: Virtual active touch: perception of virtual gratings wavelength through pointing-stick interface. IEEE TOH 5, 1 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Palluel-Germain, R., Boy, F., Orliaguet, J.P., Coello, Y.: Visual and motor constraints on trajectory planning in pointing movements. Neurosci. Lett. 372(3), 235–239 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pasquero, J., Hayward, V.: Tactile feedback can assist vision during mobile interactions. In: Proceedings of CHI’11, pp. 3277–3280 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith, T., Smith, K., Human factors of workstation telepresence. In: SOAR’89, pp. 235–250 (1990)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ziat, M., Gapenne, O., Lenay, C., Stewart, J.: Study of the dynamical acuity through a sensory substitution device in blindfolded subjects. In: Symposium in honor of M. Jeannerod (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ziat, M., Gapenne, O., Lenay, C., Stewart, J.: Perception in numerical and corporeal spaces in a 2D haptic virtual world. In: ENACTIVE’05, 10p (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ziat, M., Gapenne, O., Stewart, J., Lenay, C.: Haptic recognition of forms at different scale: a comparison of two methods of interaction. Interact. Comput. 19, 121–132 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ziat, M., Gapenne, O., Stewart, J., Lenay, C., Bausse, J.: Design of a haptic zoom: levels and steps. In: Proceedings of Worldhaptics’07, Tsukuba, Japan (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ziat M., Gapenne O., Stewart J., Lenay C.: Manipulation d’un zoom haptique continu via un dispositif de substitution sensorielle. In: IHM’07, Paris (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ziat, M., Lenay, C., Gapenne, O., Stewart, J., Ammar, A.A.B., Aubert, D.: Perceptive supplementation for an access to graphical interfaces. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 841–850. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ziat, M., Hayward, V., Chapman, C.E., Ernst, M., Lenay, C.: Tactile suppression of displacement. Exp. Brain Res. 206(3), 299–310 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ziat, M., Smith, E., Brown, C., DeWolfe, C., Hayward,V.: Ebbinghaus illusion in the tactile modality. In: Haptics Symposium 2014, Houston, TX, pp. 581–585 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mounia Ziat
    • 1
  • Eric Lecolinet
    • 2
  • Olivier Gapenne
    • 3
  • Gerard Mouret
    • 2
  • Charles Lenay
    • 3
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentNorthern Michigan UniversityMarquetteUSA
  2. 2.Telecom ParisTechParisFrance
  3. 3.Universite de Technologie de CompiegneCompiegneFrance

Personalised recommendations