Advertisement

The Development of Professional Morality Questionnaire for Civil Pilots

  • Yuchuan Luo
  • Xiaoli Luo
  • Quanchuan Wang
  • Xianlin Zeng
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 318)

Abstract

Objective To develop a questionnaire of civil pilots professional morality. Methods The theory structure of professional morality of civil pilots was constructed. Regarded to the theory structure and the result of documents and specialists evaluation, a questionnaire of civil pilots professional morality was developed. In order to examine the validity, 324 pilots of CAAC were tested. Results The professional morality of civil pilot was composed of three key dimensions. The Cronbach of full questionnaire was α = 0.863, and the content validities were from 0.760 to 0.842 (P < 0.01). Coefficient of stability of the questionnaire was beyond 0.463 (P < 0.01), and criterion validity of questionnaire was 0.564 (P < 0.01). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of questionnaire met the requirements. Conclusion The questionnaire proves to be applicable to civil pilots in evaluating their professional morality.

Keywords

Civil pilot Professional morality Questionnaire 

References

  1. 1.
    Xu S-J, Wen K-Q (1999) Ethics encyclopedia. China Radio & Television Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luo Y-C, Mou H-Y, Deng X-M (2001) Study on job-regulation of civil aviation pilots. China Saf Sci J 21(1):17–21Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhao X, Xu B-H, Gao X (2010) Research on development of “psychological stress questionnaire of china civil aviation pilots”. Space Med Med Eng 23(1):35–41MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gao Y, Chen W, Sun R-S (2010) Research on personality traits and influential factors of civil aviation pilots in china. J Saf Sci Technol 6(6):30–34Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang Q-C (2012) Eight safety consciousnesses of professional pilot. Saf Secur 9(141):51–54Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu Q-G (2011) Pilot qualifications must ≥ position requirements. Saf Secur 11(131):40–43Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dai Z-H (1987) Psychology educational measurement. East China Normal University Press, ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rong T-S (2009) AMOS and research method. Chongqing University Press, ChongqingGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen S (1997) On profession and professional morality. J China Youth Univ Polit Sci 2:59–64Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luo Y, Chen J, Yang J et al (2013) Research on the relationship between threat and crew error in civil aviation. In: Long S, Dhillon BS (eds) Proceedings of the 13th international conference on man-machine-environment system engineering. Lecture notes in electrical engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 365–370Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuchuan Luo
    • 1
  • Xiaoli Luo
    • 1
  • Quanchuan Wang
    • 1
  • Xianlin Zeng
    • 1
  1. 1.Aviation Human Factors and Ergonomics LabCivil Aviation Flight University of ChinaGuanghanChina

Personalised recommendations