Friction Behaviour of Medical Compression Stockings Against Various Mechanical Skin Models

  • Wei Ke
  • Jiyong Hu
  • Xin Ding
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 318)


To determine a promising skin model for exploring the friction behaviour of medical compression stockings (MCS), the dynamic friction properties of MCS against with two kinds of mechanical skin models are investigated in the current study. For further investigation, the difference on the friction of the two models are analysed in detail with adhesion friction model and Hertz contact theory. The coefficient of friction (COF) of MCS/Lorica is 0.34 ± 0.01, which is closer to the COF of human skin/MCS (0.36 ± 0.04), while the COF of MCS/PUR is 0.89 ± 0.01, with an increasing factor of 2.6, mainly due to the variation of elastic modulus. It can be concluded that Lorica has similar dry friction behaviour as the human skin, and elastic modulus could be the main reason to the difference on the friction of two models.


Skin-textile friction Medical compression stockings Hertz contact model Adhesion friction mechanism 



This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, the National Natural Science Foundation through project (No. 51175076) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai through project (No. 12ZR1400500). This study is also funded by CSC Fellowship awarded to the first author in 2012.


  1. 1.
    Partsch B, Partsch H (2008) Compression stockings for treating venous leg ulcers: measurement of interface pressure under a new ulcer kit. Phlebology 23(1):40–46. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2007.007018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baussan E, Bueno M, Rossi R, Derler S (2012) Analysis of current running sock structures with regard to blister prevention. Text Res J. doi: 10.1177/0040517512461698 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu D, Kwok YL, Li Y, Lao TT (2007) Skin pressure profiles and variation a with body postural changes beneath medical elastic compression stockings. Int J Dermatol 46:10MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gitis N, Sivamani R (2004) Tribometrology of skin. pp 1–20Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bueno MA, Lamy B, Renner M, ViallierRaynard P (1996) Tribological investigation of textile fabrics. Wear 195(1/2):192–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhushan B, Tang W (2011) Surface, tribological, and mechanical characterization of synthetic skins for tribological applications in cosmetic science. J Appl Polym Sci 120(5):2881–2890. doi: 10.1002/app.33340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ke W, Rotaru GM, Hu JY, Ding X, Rossi RM, Derler S (2014) Relationship between the friction and microscopic contact behavior of medical compression stockings at various strains (submitted, 2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Derler S, Schrade U, Gerhardt L-C (2007) Tribology of human skin and mechanical skin equivalents in contact with textiles. Wear 263:1112–1116. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.11.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gerhardt L-C, Mattle N, Schrade GU, Spencer ND, Derler S (2008) Study of skin-fabric interactions of relevance to decubitus: friction and contact-pressure measurements. Skin Res Technol 14(1):77–88Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ke W, Rotaru GM, Hu JY, Ding X, Derler S (2014) Analysis on the friction of medical compression stockings against human skin with in vivo measurements (submitted, 2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of TextilesDonghua UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations