Advertisement

Study on Impact Analysis of Eye Movement Data to the Bottom-Up Significant Area Calculation Model

  • Yajuan Bai
  • Meng Yang
  • Yaofeng He
  • Yuping Luo
  • Guansheng Huang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 318)

Abstract

In view of the eye movement data to improve the bottom-up area calculation model, the modified artificial calculation model for calculation of psychological experiments before and after pictures of a significant area, psychology experiment and computer model calculation results by comparison and analysis of the eye movement data of significant influence and the reasons of the area calculation model, for the eye movement data significantly improved computer area calculation model and provides the interpretation of the psychology. The results showed that the eye movement data improved significantly the area calculation model more in line with the human visual system characteristics. Significant area calculation model of recognition effect is improved obviously.

Keywords

Eye movement Bottom-up Significant area Selective attention 

References

  1. 1.
    Nurmi D, Wolski R, Grzego rczyk C et al (2008) Eucalyptus: a technical report on an elastic utility computing architecture linking your programs to useful systems. UCSB Computer Science, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siebenlist F (2009) Challenges and opportunities for virtualized security in the clouds. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM symposium on access control models and technologies, SACMAT. 09. ACM, New York, USA, pp 1–2Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark C, Fraser K, Hand S et al (2005) Live migration of virtual machines. In: Proceedings of NSDI. 05. Berkeley, CA, USA, pp 273–286Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Theeuwes J (1991) Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Percept Psychophys 50(2):184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Folk CL, Remington RW, Johnston JC (1992) Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18(4):1030–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Müller HJ, Heller D, Ziegler J (1995) Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Percept Psychophys 57(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kawahara J-I (2010) Identifying a “default” visual search mode with operant conditioning. Acta Psychol 135:38–49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yajuan Bai
    • 1
  • Meng Yang
    • 2
  • Yaofeng He
    • 1
  • Yuping Luo
    • 1
  • Guansheng Huang
    • 1
  1. 1.Beijing Special Vehicle InstituteBeijingChina
  2. 2.Beijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations