Students’ Spontaneous Use of Diagrams in Written Communication: Understanding Variations According to Purpose and Cognitive Cost Entailed
This study examined the amounts of information that students represented in diagrams compared to text when taking notes (self-directed communication) and when constructing explanations for others (others-directed communication). The participants were 98 Japanese university students who read one of two passages (differing in imageability) in Japanese (L1) and in English (L2). While reading, they could take notes, and were subsequently requested to produce an explanation of the passage using L1 or L2. The students represented more information in diagrams in notes they took from the passage of higher imageability in L1. However, in their explanation of that same passage for others – still using L1 – they represented more information in text. This finding suggests perceptual differences about the functions of diagrams in self- and others-directed communication. Results also confirmed that passage imageability and students’ language proficiency affect cognitive processing cost, which in turn influences the extent to which diagrams are used.
Keywordsspontaneous diagram production strategy use perceptions and beliefs written communication cognitive processing cost text and diagrammatic representations
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Baddeley, A.D.: Working Memory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986)Google Scholar
- 7.Baddeley, A.D.: Human Memory. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (1998)Google Scholar
- 12.Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E.: Peer Instruction as a Way of Promoting Spontaneous Use of Diagrams When Solving Math Word Problems. In: McNamara, D.S., Trafton, J.G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society, pp. 677–682. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2007)Google Scholar
- 13.Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E., Ichikawa, S.: The Effects of Perception of Efficacy and Diagram Construction Skills on Students’ Spontaneous Use of Diagrams When Solving Math Word Problems. In: Goel, A.K., Jamnik, M., Narayanan, N.H. (eds.) Diagrams 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6170, pp. 197–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Manalo, E., Uesaka, Y.: Elucidating the Mechanism of Spontaneous Diagram Use in Explanations: How Cognitive Processing of Text and Diagrammatic Representations Are Influenced by Individual and Task-Related Factors. In: Cox, P., Plimmer, B., Rodgers, P. (eds.) Diagrams 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7352, pp. 35–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Hartley, J., Davies, I.K.: Note-taking: A Critical Review. Innovations in Education & Training International 15, 207–224 (1978)Google Scholar
- 19.Boch, F., Piolat, A.: Note Taking and Learning: A Summary of Research. The WAC Journal 16, 101–113Google Scholar
- 20.Buzan, T.: Use Your Head. BBC Publications, London (1974)Google Scholar
- 21.Smith, P.L., Tompkins, G.E.: Structured Notetaking: A New Strategy for Content Area Readers. Journal of Reading 32, 46–53 (1988)Google Scholar
- 22.How CDs and DVDs Work, http://www.explainthatstuff.com/cdplayers.html