Advertisement

Green Machining of Ti-6Al-4V Under Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) Condition

  • Liu ZhiqiangEmail author
Chapter
  • 2.3k Downloads
Part of the Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology book series (MFMT)

Abstract

Although many studies have been done on the MQL applications in different machining process, there are few of studies on the influences about selections of MQL parameters. Different parameters of MQL system have different influences on the milling force and milling temperature, which are closely connected to the lubrication and the coolant. The cutting force and temperature play significant roles in the improving/reducing cutting quality of workpiece and extend/shorten tool life, by changing different parameters of MQL system. This chapter presents an experiment of end-milling titanium alloy with MQL system, discussing the influences of different parameters. One object of the experiment is to investigate the influences of Ti-6Al-4V. The results of experiment will help to understand the influences of selecting different parameters on the end-milling process. Another object is to apply the selected optimal parameters in the former object to milling Ti-6Al-4V.

Keywords

Rake Face Minimum Quantity Lubrication Spray Distance Uncut Chip Thickness Spray Angle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51305174).

References

  1. 1.
    Dhar NR, Kamruzzaman M, Ahmed M (2006) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on tool wear and surface roughness in turning AISI-4340 steel. J Mater Process Technol 28:299–304Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bin S, Albert JS, Simon CT (2008) Application of nanofluids in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Tribol Trans 51:730–737Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weinert K, Inasaki I, Sutherland JW, Wakabayashi T (2004) Dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 53(2):11–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tawakoli T, Hadad MJ, Sadeghi MH, Daneshi A, Stöckert S, Rasifard A (2009) An experimental investigation of the effects of workpiece and grinding parameters on minimum quantity lubrication—MQL grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(12–13):924–932Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davim PJ, Astakhov VP (2008) Machining fundamentals and recent advances [M]. Springer, London, pp 195–223Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Chiffre L, Tosello G, Píška M, Müller P (2009) Investigation on capability of the reaming process using minimal quantity lubrication. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2(1):47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boelkins C, Unist (2009) MQL: Lean and Green. Cutting Tool Engineering 61(3):71–75Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ju C (2005) Development of particulate imaging systems and their application in the study of cutting fluid mist formation and minimum quantity lubrication in machining. pp 154–156Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sun J (2004) Cutting fluid mist formation and behavior mechanisms. Michigan Technological University, HoughtonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liao YS, Lin HM, Chen YC (2007) Feasibility study of the minimum quantity lubrication in high-speed end milling of NAK80 hardened steel by coated carbide tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(11):1667–1676Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L´opez de Lacalle LN et al (2006) Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of spray cutting fluids in high speed milling. J Mater Process Technol 172:11–15Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Byrne G, Dornfeld D, Denkena B (2003) Advancing cutting technology. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(2):483–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bhowmick S, Alpas AT (2008) Minimum quantity lubrication drilling of aluminium–silicon alloys in water using diamond-like carbon coated drills. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(12–13):1429–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Varadarajan AS, Philip PK, Ramamoorthy B (2002) Investigations on hard turning with minimal cutting fluid application (HTMF) and its comparison with dry and wet turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 422(2):193–200Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Obikawa T, Asano Y, Kamata Y (2009) Computer fluid dynamics analysis for efficient spraying of oil mist in finish-turning of Inconel 718. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(12–13):971–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rahman M, Senthil Kumar A, Salam MU (2002) Experimental evaluation on the effect of minimal quantities of lubricant in milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(5):539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bhowmick S, Lukitsch MJ, Alpas AT (2010) Dry and minimum quantity lubrication drilling of cast magnesium alloy (AM60). Int J Mach Tools Manuf (In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 10 February 2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tawakoli T, Hadad MJ, Sadeghi MH (2010) Influence of oil mist parameters on minimum quantity lubrication-MQL grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf (In Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available online 15 March 2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    da Silva LR, Bianchi EC, Fusse RY, Catai RE, Franca TV, Aguiar PR (2007) Analysis of surface integrity for minimum quantity lubricant-MQL in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(2):412–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Obikawa T, Kamata Y, Shinozuka J (2006) High speed grooving with applying MQL. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(14):1854–1861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dhar NR, Ahmed MT, Islam S (2007) An experimental investigation on effect of minimum quantity lubrication in machining AISI 1040 steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 5:748–753Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Obikawa T, Kamata Y, Asano Y, Nakayama K, Otieno AW (2008) Micro-liter lubrication machining of Inconel 718. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(15):1605–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thepsonthi T, Hamdi M, Mitsui K (2009) Investigation into minimal-cutting-fluid application in high-speed milling of hardened steel using carbide mills. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(2):156–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shaw MC (2005) Metal cutting principles [m]. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 156–158Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li X (1997) Development of a predictive model for stress distributions at the tool-chip interface in machining. J Mater Process Technol 63(1–3):169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tay AO, Stevenson MG, de Vahl Davis G (1974) Using the finite element method to determine temperature distributions in orthogonal machining. Proc Inst Mech Eng 188(55):627–638Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Adibi-Sedeh AH, Madhavan V, Bahr B (2002) Upper bound analysis of oblique cutting with nose radius tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(9):1081–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hu RS, Mathew P, Oxley PLB, Young HT (1986) Allowing for end cutting edge effects in predicting forces in bar turning with oblique machining conditions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part C: J Mech Eng Sci 200(C2):89–99Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li H, Shin YC (2006) A comprehensive dynamic end milling simulation model. J Manuf Sci Eng 128(1):86–94Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rao BC (2002) Modeling and analysis of high speed machining of aerospace alloys. Purdue University, West Lafayette, pp 25–66Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Altintas Y, Eynian M, Onozuka H (2008) Identification of dynamic cutting force coefficients and chatter stability with process damping. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):371–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oxley PLB (1989) Mechanics of machining: an analytical approach to assessing machinability. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringJiangsu University of Science and TechnologyZhenjiangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations